Abstract
Most approaches to integrated product and process design focus on decision support — providing designers with information about the implications of their choices for different stages of the product life cycle. When the needs of different life cycle stages conflict, however, these techniques provide no basis for determining which should take precedence. This paper proposes a methodology for helping designers assess trade-offs between the competing needs to minimize cost and maximize quality, by drawing on principles from decision analysis. Research on decision analysis in design tends to focus on the mathematics of decision-making, but this methodology takes the view that the value of decision analysis is in the insights, not the numbers, it generates. It is argued that decision analysis should not be a normative tool for making optimal choices, but a framework for systematic discussion of important life cycle issues. This paper discusses the implications of manufacturing for design decisions, and proposes four conditions that a systematic approach to design decision-making should address to take these implications into account. The methodology is described, and illustrated with a case study. The paper ends by discussing the future work needed to validate and refine the methodology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
G. Pahl and W. Beitz, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 2nd Ed., Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3540199179, 1996
S. Pugh, Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering, Addison Wesley, ISBN 0201416395, 1990
D.L. Thurston, J.V. Carnahan and T. Liu, Optimisation of Design Utility, Journal of Mechanical Design, No 116, 1994, pp801–808
G.A. Hazelrigg, A Framework for Decision-Based Design, Journal of Mechanical Design, No120, 1998, pp653–658
J. Wang, Ranking Engineering Design Concepts Using a Fuzzy Outranking Preference Model, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, No119, 2001, pp161–170
S-W. Hsiao, Concurrent Design Method for Developing a New Product, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, No29, 2002, pp41–55
K.J. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd Ed., Yale University Press, ISBN 0300013639 m, 1973
T.L. Vincent, Game Theory as a Design Tool, Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design, No105, 1983, pp165–170
L. Chen and S. Li, A Computerized Team Approach for Concurrent Product and Process Design Optimisation, Computer-Aided Design, No34, 2002, pp 57–69
L.L. Bucciarelli, Designing Engineers, MIT Press, ISBN 0262023776 m, 1994
L. Phillips, A Theory of Requisite Decision Models, Acta Psychologica, No56, 1984, pp29–48
W. Edwards and D. von Winterfeldt, Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521273048, 1986
W. Edwards, How to Use Multi-Attribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision-Making, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, No7, 1977, pp326–340
K.G. Swift and J.D. Booker, Process Selection: From Design to Manufacture, 2nd Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, ISBN 0750654376, 2003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Holt, R., Barnes, C. (2005). Analysing Design Decisions from a Product and Process Perspective. In: Bramley, A., Brissaud, D., Coutellier, D., McMahon, C. (eds) Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3482-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3482-2_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3481-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3482-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)