Abstract
A model based on the evolution of notated language and chaotics is presented to explain the emergence of language. Language emerges as the bifurcation from percept-based to concept-based thought. Our first words are our first concepts and act as strange attractors for the percepts associated with that concept. The mind is shown to be the brain acting as a percept processor plus language.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bickerton, D. 1990. Language and species. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
Bickerton, D. 1995. (1996) Language and human behaviour. Seattle: University of Washington Press. [Second edition published by London: University College London Press].
Bickerton, D. 2000. “How protolanguage became language.” In: Knight, C.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.; and Hurford, J. (eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language 264–284. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christiansen, M. 1994. “Infinite languages finite minds: Connectionism, learning and linguistic structure.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Centre for Cognitive Studies, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Christiansen, M.; Dale, R.; Ellefson, M.; and Conway C. 2005. “The role of sequential learning in language evolution: Computational and experimental studies.” In: Cangelosi, A.; and Parisi, D. (eds.), Simulating the evolution of language. London: Springer-Verlag, in press.
Christiansen, M.; and Devlin, J. 1997. “Recursive inconsistencies are hard to learn: A connectionist perspective on universal word order correlations.” In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Cognitive Society Conference 113–118. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Christiansen, M.; and Ellefson, M. 2002. “Linguistic adaptation without linguistic constraints: The role of sequential learning in language evolution.” In: Wray, A. (ed.), The transition to language 335–358. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Christiansen, M.; and Kirby, S. 2003. “Language evolution: The hardest problem in science?” In: Christiansen, M.; and Kirby, S. (eds.), Language evolution 1–15. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deacon, T.W. 1997. The symbolic species: The co-evolution of the brain and language. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.
Donald, M. 1991. The origin of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Donald, M. 1998. “Mimesis and the executive suite.” In: Hurford, J.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.; and Knight C. (eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language 44–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunbar, R. 1992. “Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates.” Journal of Human Evolution 20: 469–493.
Heylighen, F.; and Joslyn, C. 2001. The law of requisite variety. http://pespmcl.vub.ac.be/REQVAR.html.
Hockett, C. 1960. “The origin of speech.” Scientific American 203:88–111.
Kaufmann, S. 1995. At home in the universe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, T. 1972. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Logan, R.K. 2004 (1986). The alphabet effect. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. [First published by New York: Wm. Morrow].
Logan, R.K. 1995. The fifth language: Learning a living in the computer age. Toronto: Stoddart Publishing.
Logan, R.K. 1997. “The extended mind: Understanding language and thought in terms of complexity and chaos theory.” Presented at the 7th Annual Conference of The Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences at Marquette U., Milwaukee, Wisconsin, August 1, 1997.
Logan, R.K. 2004 (2000a). The sixth language: Learning a living in the internet age. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press. [First published by Toronto: Stoddart Publishing].
Logan, R.K. 2000b. “The extended mind: Understanding language and thought in terms of complexity and chaos theory.” In: Lance, S. (ed.), Communication and Speech Annual, Vol. 14 63–80. New York: The New York State Communication Association.
McLuhan, M. 1962. The gutenberg galaxy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding media. NewYork: McGraw Hill.
McLuhan, M.; and Logan, R.K. 1977. “Alphabet, mother of invention.” Etcetera 34: 373–383.
Pinker, S. 2003. “Language as an adaptation to the cognitive niche.” In: Christiansen, M.; and Kirby, S. (eds.), Language evolution 16–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prigogine, I. 1997. The end of certainty. New York: Free Press.
Prigogine, I.; and Stengers, I. 1984. Order out of chaos. New York: Bantam Books.
Schmandt-Besserat, D. 1978. “The earliest precursor of writing.” Scientific American 238: 50–58.
Schmandt-Besserat, D. 1992. Before writing, Vol. 1. From counting to cuneiform. Houston: University of Texas Press.
Stringer, C.; and McKie, R. 1996. African exodus: The origins of modern humanity. London: Johnathan Cape.
Tomasello, M. 1999. The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Logan, R.K. (2006). The extended mind model of the origin of language and culture. In: Gontier, N., Van Bendegem, J.P., Aerts, D. (eds) Evolutionary Epistemology, Language and Culture. Theory and Decision Library A:, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3395-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3395-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3394-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3395-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)