Skip to main content

The biological boundary conditions for our classical physical world view

  • Chapter
Evolutionary Epistemology, Language and Culture

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library A: ((TDLA,volume 39))

Abstract

It is shown that the laws of nature providing us with cognitive survival competence are not objective properties of the world, rather they depend on the previously acquired phenotype in the same sense as the acting competence of organisms depends on the previously acquired organic phenotype. For example: the law of energy-conservation can be derived from the homogeneity of time. But homogeneity in time is defined by how our internal clock (which is part of our phenotype) is constructed. Cognitive evolution is subject to the boundary condition that will result in a world view (i.e. physics) that has to be invariant under all we do within this world-view. As locomotion is the oldest and most important capability of our ancestors our world view must be invariant first of all under locomotion, i.e. it has to be Galilei-invariant.

Emmy Noether has shown that this is sufficient to derive the 10 conservation laws of classical mechanics. The other so-called laws of nature are defined as invariants of physical measurements. Therefore, cognitive evolution itself has brought about what we call the laws of nature and, therefore, cannot be subject to these laws as advocated by Campbell.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barrow, J.D. 1990. Theories of everything. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. 1974. “Evolutionary epistemology.” In: Schlipp, P.A. (ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper, Vol. I 413–459. Illinois: La Salle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P.C. 1990. “Why is the physical world so comprehensible?” In: Zurek, W. (ed.) Complexity, entropy and the physics of Information, Vol. VIII 61–70. Addison Wesley. [Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity].

    Google Scholar 

  • Diettrich, O. 1989. Kognitive, organische und gesellschaftliche Evolution. Berlin: Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diettrich, O. 1994a. “Heisenberg and Gödel in the light of constructivist evolutionary epistemology.” Ludus Vitalis 2: 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diettrich, O. 1994b. “Is there a theory of everything?” Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications 80: 166–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diettrich, O. 1997. “Sprache als Theorie: Von der Rolle der Sprache im Lichte einer konstruktivistischen Erkenntnistheorie.” Papiere zur Linguistik 56(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diettrich, O. 2001. “A physical approach to the construction of cognition and to cognitive evolution.” Foundations of Science 6(4): 273–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.; and Bosso, M. 1972. Correspondence 1903–1955. Paris: Feynman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, H. von. 2003. Understanding understanding. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, E. von. 2001. Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Palmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. 1980. Classical Mechanics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E. 1902. Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte, 10th Ed. Berlin: Georg Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hösle, V. 1988. “Tragweite und Grenzen der evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie.” Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie XIX: 343–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. 1941. “Kant’s Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie.” Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie 15(S): 94–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. 1971. “Knowledge, beliefs and freedom.” In: Weiss, P. (ed.), Hierarchically organized systems in theory and practice 231–262. New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.; and Newman, J. 1958. Gödel’s proof. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeser, E. 1984. “The evolution of scientific method.” In: Wuketits, F.M. (ed.), Concepts and approaches in evolutionary epistemology 145–163. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. 1967. Biologie et connaissance. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. 1970. Genetic epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. 1973. Objektive Erkenntnis. Hamburg: Hoffman und Campe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. 1979. Vom Sein zum Werden. München, Zürich: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. 1924. Axiomatik der relativistischen Raum-Zeit-Lehre. Braunschweig: Vieweg & Sohn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R. 1975. Die Ordnung des Lebendigen. Berlin: Paul Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegler, A. 2001. “Towards a radical constructivist understanding of science.” Foundations of Science 6: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. 1971. Sprechakte. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Mein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. 1872. Principles of Psychology, 2nd Ed, Vol. 2. London: Williams and Norgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W. 1969. Metaphysik, Skepsis, Wissenschaft. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, J.J.B. von. 1921. Umwelt und Innenleben der Tiere. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C.H. 1959. “Evolutionary systems-animal and human.” Nature 182: 1634–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, H.-D. 1984. Die Physik der Zeitrichtung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Diettrich, O. (2006). The biological boundary conditions for our classical physical world view. In: Gontier, N., Van Bendegem, J.P., Aerts, D. (eds) Evolutionary Epistemology, Language and Culture. Theory and Decision Library A:, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3395-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics