Skip to main content

Evolutionary epistemology: The non-adaptationist approach

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library A: ((TDLA,volume 39))

Abstract

Earlier versions of evolutionary epistemology were based on—or at least strongly informed by—the adaptationist paradigm. It is for this reason that advocates of evolutionary epistemology have been frequently criticized by those who have adopted an organismic perspective in evolutionary thinking. Evolutionists defending the view that any living system—including all its characters at the anatomical as well as the behavioral level—can be sufficiently explained in terms of adaptation, have neglected the (somehow trivial) fact that organisms are active systems that do not entirely depend on their respective environment(s). Meanwhile, however, a systems-theoretical approach to understanding living beings and their evolution has made clear that (1) organisms and their environment(s) have a common history and have not evolved independent of each other, (2) any living system and its environment(s) are linked together by a feedback principle, and (3) adaptability is not defined by the environment but the organism itself. This has serious consequences for evolutionary epistemology. In this paper, I outline a non-adaptationist version of this epistemology. I also briefly discuss its philosophical implications. The main focus is the problem of realism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bertalanffy, L. von. 1952. Problems of life: An evaluation of modern biological and scientific thought. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradie, M. 1986. “Assessing evolutionary epistemology.” Biology and Philosophy 1: 401–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callebaut, W. 1993. Taking the naturalistic turn or how real philosophy of science is done. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. 1974a. “Evolutionary epistemology.” In: Schilpp, P.A. (ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper, Vol. I 413–463. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. 1974b. “‘Downward causation’ in hierarchically organized biological systems.” In: Ayala, F.J.; and Dobzhansky, T. (eds.), Studies in the philosophy of biology 179–186. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.J. 1983. “Meaning and evolutionary epistemology.” Theoria 49: 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.J. 1986. “Evolutionary epistemology and the scientific method.” Philosophica 37: 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.S. 2001. The evolution of reason: Logic as a branch of biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1958. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. New York: New American Library. [First edition in 1859 by London: Murray].

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C. 1991. Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diettrich, O. 2003. “Cognitive evolution.” In: Wuketits, F.M.; and Antweiler, C. (eds.), Handbook of evolution, Vol. I 25–75. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. 1983. Hen’s teeth and horse’s toes: Further reflections in natural history. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J.; and Vrba, E.S. 1982. “Exaptation: A missing term in the science of form.” Paleobiology 8: 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, W.F.; and Weingarten, M. 1990. “Die biotheoretischen Mängel der evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 21: 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heschl, A. 1997. “Who’s afraid of a non-metaphorical evolutionary epistemology?”Philosophia naturalis 34: 107–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J. 1958. “The evolutionary process.” In: Huxley, J.; Hardy, A.C.; and Ford, E.B. (eds.), Evolution as a process 1–23. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irrgang, B. 2001. Lehrbuch der evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie: Thesen, Konzeptionen und Kritik. Munich: Reinhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1982. “Organism and environment.” In: Plotkin, H.C. (ed.), Learning, development, and culture: Essays in evolutionary epistemology 151–170. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. 1941. “Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie.” Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie 15: 94–125. (English translation in Plotkin, H.C., op. cit. 121–143.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. 1977. Behind the mirror: A search for a natural history of human knowledge. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 2000. “Darwin’s influence on modern thought.” Scientific American 283(1): 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. 1974. “What is it like to be a bat.” The Philosophical Review 83: 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oeser, E. 1987. Psychozoikum: Evolution und Mechanismus der menschlichen Erkenntnisfähigkeit. Berlin: Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeser, E. 1988a. Das Abenteuer der kollektiven Vernunft: Evolution und Involution der Wissenschaft. Berlin: Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeser, E. 1988b. “Der wissenschaftliche Realismus.” In: Wiener Studien zur Wissenschaftstheorie, Vol. 2 (Das Realismusproblem) 11–41. Vienna: Österreichische Staatsdruckerei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeser, E. 1997. “The two-stage model of evolutionary epistemology.” Evolution and Cognition 3(1): 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin, H.C. 1987. “Evolutionary epistemology as a science.” Biology and Philosophy 2: 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. 1972. Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. 1987. The many faces of realism. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.J. 1987. Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary theories of mind and behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R. 1977. “A systems-analytical approach to macro-evolutionary phenomena.” The Quarterly Review of Biology 52: 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R. 1987. Begriff und Welt: Biologische Grundlagen des Erkennens und Begreifens. Berlin: Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. 1986. Taking Darwin seriously: A naturalistic approach to philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. 1989. “The view from somewhere: A critical defence of evolutionary epistemology.” In: Hahlweg, K.; and Hooker, C.A. (eds.), Issues in evolutionary epistemology 185–228. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. 1967. The problems of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G. 1963. This view of life: The world of an evolutionist. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjölander, S. 1995. “Some cognitive breakthroughs in the evolution of cognition and consciousness and their impact on the biology of language.” Evolution and Cognition 1: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Williams, S. 2003. “Darwin and Descartes’ demon: On the possible evolutionary origin of belief in an external world.” Evolution and Cognition 9: 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, J. von. 1928. Theoretische Biologie. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G. 1975. Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie. Stuttgart: Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G. 1984. “Mesocosm and objective knowledge: On problems solved by evolutionary epistemology.” In: Wuketits, F.M. (ed.), Concepts and approaches in evolutionary epistemology: Towards an evolutionary theory of knowledge 69–121. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G.P. 1985. “Über die populationsgenetischen Grundlagen einer Systemtheorie der Evolution.” In: Ott, J.; Wagner, G.P.; and Wuketits, F.M. (eds.), Evolution, Ordnung und Erkenntnis 97–111. Berlin: Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P.A. 1969. “The living system: Determinism stratified.” Studium Generale 22: 361–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, L.L. 1965. Internal factors of evolution. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. 1996. Plan and purpose in nature. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, F.M. 1984. “Evolutionary epistemology: A challenge to science and philosophy.” 1–33. In: Wuketits, F.M., op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, F.M. 1988. Evolutionstheorien: Historische Voraussetzungen, Positionen, Kritik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, F.M. 1989. “Cognition: A non-adaptationist view.” La Nuova Critica 9–10: 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, F.M. 1990. Evolutionary epistemology and its implications for humankind. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, F.M. 1997. “Evolution, cognition, and survival: Evolutionary epistemology and derivative topics.” World Futures 51: 47–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, F.M. 2000a. “The organism’s place in evolution: Darwin’s views and contemporary organismic theories.” In: Peters, D.S.; and Weingarten, M. (eds.), Organisms, genes and evolution: Evolutionary theory at the crossroads 83–91. Stuttgart: Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, F.M. 2000b. “Functional realism.” In: Carsetti, A. (ed.), Functional models of cognition: Self-organizing dynamics and semantic structures in cognitive systems 27–38. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wuketits, F.M. (2006). Evolutionary epistemology: The non-adaptationist approach. In: Gontier, N., Van Bendegem, J.P., Aerts, D. (eds) Evolutionary Epistemology, Language and Culture. Theory and Decision Library A:, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3395-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics