Abstract
Most of the current theories on language evolution on the market are structural and functional rather than strategic in nature, and are built upon the presupposition that it is possible to model our innate linguistic endowment and then correlate these models with some neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory. I argue that, alternatively, complex meaning relations between assertions and the world emerge from evolutionary semantic games played by the Population of Utterers and the Population of Interpreters sampled from a diamorphic population of agents. These games provide a realistic application of game-theoretic semantics (GTS) to evolutionary situations (EGTS). I will discuss the foundational status of EGTS, relating it to Ludwig Wittgenstein’s language games and Charles S. Peirce’s pragmatist philosophy, thus providing an alternative to adaptation in evolutionary epistemology.
Supported by the Academy of Finland (Logic and Game Theory, 1103130).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allott, N. 2003. Game theory and communication. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 15, University College London.
Batali, J. 1998. “Computational simulations of the emergence of grammar.” In: Hurford, J.R.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.; and Knight, C. (eds.), Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases 405–426, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brighton, H.; and Kirby, S. 2001. “The survival of the smallest: Stability conditions for the cultural evolution of compositional language.” In: Kelemen, J.; and Sosik, P. (eds.), Advances in artificial life 592–601. Berlin: Springer.
Camic, C. 1986. “The matter of habit.” American Journal of Sociology 91: 1039–1087.
Campbell, D.T. 1974. “Evolutionary epistemology.” In: Schilpp, P.A. (ed.), The philosophy of Karl R. Popper 412–463. LaSalle: Open Court.
Campbell, D.T. 1987. “Evolutionary epistemology.” In: Gerard, D.; and Bartley, W.W., III (eds.), Evolutionary epistemology: Theory of rationality and the sociology of knowledge 47–90. La Salle: Open Court.
Cosmides, L. 1989. “The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.” Cognition 31: 187–276.
Cressman, R. 2003. Evolutionary dynamics and extensive form games. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Darwin, F. (ed.). 2000. The Autobiography of Charles Darwin. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Deacon, T.W. 1997. The symbolic species: The coevolution of language and human brain. London: Penguin.
Dessalles, J.-L. 1998. “Altruism, status and the origin of relevance.” In: Hurford, J.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.; and Knight, C. (eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language 130–147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dessalles, J.-L. 2000. “Language and hominid politics.” In: Knight, C.; Hurford, J.R.; and Studdert-Kennedy, M. (eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origin of linguistic form 62–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gärdenfors, P. 2004. “Cooperation and the evolution of symbolic communication.” In: Oller, D.K.; Griebel, U. (eds.), The evolution of communication systems 237–256. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Grice, H.P. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hintikka, J. 1973. Logic, language-games and information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hintikka, J.; and Kulas, J. 1983. The game of language: Studies in game-theoretical semantics and its applications. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Hintikka, J.; and Sandu, G. 1997. “Game-theoretical semantics.” In: van Benthem, J.; and ter Meulen, A. (eds.), Handbook of logic and language 361–410. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hurford, J.R. 1989. “Biological evolution of the saussurean sign as a component of the language acquisition device.” Lingua 77: 187–222.
Janasik, T.; Pietarinen, A.-V.; and Sandu, G. 2003. “Anaphora and extensive games.” In: Andronis, M.; Debenport, E.; Pycha, A.; and Yoshimura, K. (eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society 38: The Main Session 285–295, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Janasik, T.; and Sandu, G. 2003. “Dynamic game semantics.” In: Peregrin, J. (ed.), Meaning: The dynamic turn 215–240. Oxford: Elsevier.
Jucker, A.H. 1994. “The feasibility of historical pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 22: 529–547.
Kirby, S. 2000. “Syntax without natural selection: How compositionality emerges from vocabulary in a population of learners.” In: Knight, C.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.; and Hurford, J. (eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form 303–323. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. 1969. Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Marshack, J.; and Radner, R. 1972. Economic theory of teams. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McKinsey, J.C. 1954. Introduction to the theory of games. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Millikan, R. 1984. Language, thought, and other biological categories. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
von Neumann, J.; and Morgenstern, O. 1944. Theory of games and economic behaviour. New York: John Wiley.
Nowak, M.A.; Plotkin, J.B.; and Krakauer, D.C. 1999. “The evolutionary language game.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 200: 147–162.
Oliphant, M.; and Batali, J. 1996. “Learning and the emergence of coordinated communication.” Center for Research on Language Newsletter 11(1).
Peirce, C.S. 1931–1958. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Hartshorne, C.; Weiss, P.; and Burks, A.W. (eds.), Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C.S. 1967. “Manuscripts.” The Houghton Library of Harvard University. Identified by Robin, Richard. 1967. Annotated catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Pietarinen, A.-V. 2001. “Most even budged yet: Some cases for game-theoretic semantics in natural language.” Theoretical Linguistics 27: 20–54.
Pietarinen, A.-V. 2003. “Peirce’s game-theoretic ideas in logic.” Semiotica 144: 33–47.
Pietarinen, A.-V. 2004. “Semantic games in logic and epistemology.” In: Rahman, S.; Symons, J.; Gabbay, D.; and van Bendegem, J.P. (eds.), Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science 57–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pietarinen, A.-V. 2005a. “The evolution of semantics and language games for meaning.” Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, in press.
Pietarinen, A.-V. 2005b. “Grice in the wake of Peirce.” Pragmatics & Cognition 12, 395–415.
Pietarinen, A.-V. 2005c. “Peirce’s magic lantern: Moving pictures of thought.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, in press.
Pietarinen, A.-V. 2005d. Signs of Logic: Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games, and Communication, Dordrecht: Springer.
Pietarinen, A.-V.; and Sandu, G. 2004. “IF logic, game-theoretical semantics and the philosophy of science.” In: Rahman, S.; Symons, J.; Gabbay, D.; and Van Bendegem, J.P. (eds.), Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science 105–138, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Plotkin, H. 1994. The nature of knowledge: Concerning adaptations, instinct and the evolution of intelligence. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.
Sally, D. 2003. “Risky speech: Behavioral game theory and pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1223–1245.
Shubik, M. 1985. Game theory in the social sciences. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Skyrms, B. 1996. Evolution of the social contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stalnaker, R. 1974. “Pragmatic presuppositions.” In: Munitz, M.K.; and Unger, P.K. (eds.), Semantics and philosophy 197–213. New York: New York University Press.
Steels, L.; and McIntyre, A. 1999. “Spatially distributed naming games.” Advances in Complex Systems 1: 301–323.
Turner, K. (ed.). 1999. The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view. Oxford: Elsevier.
Wierzbicka, A. 2003. Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interactions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pietarinen, AV. (2006). Evolutionary game-theoretic semantics and its foundational status. In: Gontier, N., Van Bendegem, J.P., Aerts, D. (eds) Evolutionary Epistemology, Language and Culture. Theory and Decision Library A:, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3395-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3395-8_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3394-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3395-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)