Skip to main content

Safety Analysis Methods—Software Development Questions

  • Conference paper
Cyberspace Security and Defense: Research Issues

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry ((NAII,volume 196))

  • 557 Accesses

Abstract

This paper is a general overview of current practice regarding safety analysis problem and software safety engineering and assessment process. Generic safety development pattern is shown. Some work in progress is mentioned: OF-FMEA and Safety and Trust Cases development methods and tools.

The Author is currently an Internal Safety Assessor and a member of Quality and Safety Group of Bombardier. He received a Ph.D. from Electronics, Telecommunication and Informatics Department of the Gdansk University of Technology in Gdansk, Poland. The full paper was prepared in December 2004 (e-mail: anta13@plusnet.pl, www: http://www.anta13.neostrada.pl/tadeusz.html).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

7. References

  • Bishop P. G. and R.E. Bloomfield, A Methodology for Safety Case Development, Safety-critical Systems Symposium, Birmingham, UK, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blechinger, Ch., ProCEN — A tool to manage the CENELEC RAMS Process, SIGNAL + DRAHT (96) 4/2004, p. 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braband, J., The importance of a safety culture in railway signaling, SIGNAL + DRAHT (96) 5/2004, p. 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cichocki, T. and J. Górski, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis for Safety-Critical Systems with Software Components, in: Floor Koornneef, Meine van der Meulen (eds.) Computer Safety, Reliability and Security, Proceedings of 19th International Conference SAFECOMP 2000, Rotterdam (The Netherlands), October 24–27, 2000, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1943, p. 382–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cichocki, T. and J. Górski, Formal Support for Fault Modeling and Analysis, in: Udo Voges (ed.), Proceedings of Computer Safety, Reliability and Security, 20th International Conference SAFECOMP 2001, Budapest (Hungary), September 26–28, 2001, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2187, p. 190–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cichocki, T. and J. Górski, OF-FMEA-an approach to safety analysis of object oriented software intensive system, The 9th International Conference on Advanced Computer Systems (ACS'2002), Miedzyzdroje (Poland), October 23–25, 2002 (published in The Kuwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science — 752, ISBN: 1-4020-7396-8, September 2003, p. 271–280).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. D., Towards a Model of Safety Culture, Safety Science (2000): vol. 36, p. 111–136 (http://behavioural-safety.com/articles/Towards_A_Model_Of_Safety_Culture/).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, B., Syntactic Measures of Complexity, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Manchester, 1999, (245 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. van Katwijk, Bo Sandén, and J. Zalewski, An Approach to Evaluate Real-Time Software Architectures for Safety-Critical Systems, 2003, Proc. Workshop on Critical Systems Development with UML, San Francisco, Calif., October 21, 2003, 121–128 (http://www.eg3.com/real/safety.htm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveson, N. G., Safeware: System Safety and Computers. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1995, ISBN 0-201-11972-2, (680 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveson, N. G., A Systems-Theoretic Approach to Safety in Software-Intensive Systems, to appear in IEEE Trans. on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood, B., Assessing the dependability of Software-based systems: the importance role of confidence, KKIO 2004, Software Engineering Conference, Gdansk, 5–8 October, 2004, p. 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermid, J. A., A.J. Vickers, and S.P. Wilson, Managing Analytical Complexity of Safety Critical Systems using Viewpoints, Department of Computer Science, University of York, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Management Institute, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®Guide), November 2003, (257 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmill, F., Subjectivity in Risk Analysis. Risk Analysis and Safety Management of Technical Systems, Conference and Workshops, Gdansk-Gdynia, 25–27, June 2001, p. 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmill, F., Risk-based test planning during system development. KKIO 2004, Software Engineering Conference, Gdansk, 5–8 October, 2004, p. 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, M., Problem-Solving in Groups, Gower Publishing Limited, Gower House, 2002, (185 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanz, R., and J. Zalewski, Pattern-Based Control Systems Engineering, IEEE Control Systems, vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 43–60, July 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M., The Fifth Discipline, The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization, Doubleday, 1990, (389 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, J. N., Safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 76 (2002), p. 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speirs, F. and C. W. Johnson, Safety Culture in the face of industrial change: a case study from the UK Rail Industry, University of Glasgow, Scotland, May 29, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strigini, L., Formalism and judgment in assurance cases, A position statement for the workshop on “Assurance Cases: Best Practices, Possible Obstacles, and Future Opportunities,” held at DSN 2004, International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, Florence, Italy, June 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. A., The Safety of Software—Constructing and Assuring Argument, University of York, Department of Computer Science, Ph.D. Thesis, September 2003, (298 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, Ch. B., J. B. Goodenough, and J. J. Hudak, Dependability Cases, May 2004, Technical Note, CMU/SEI-2004-TN-016, (31 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski, J., Real-Time Software Architectures and Design Patterns: Fundamental Concepts and Their Consequences, SCR 2003 (also: Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 25, No. 1, p. 133–146, July 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski, J., W. Ehrenberger, F. Saglietti, J. Górski, and A. Kornecki, Safety of computer control systems: challenges and results in software development, Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 27, No. 1, p. 23–37, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cichocki, T. (2005). Safety Analysis Methods—Software Development Questions. In: Kowalik, J.S., Gorski, J., Sachenko, A. (eds) Cyberspace Security and Defense: Research Issues. NATO Science Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry, vol 196. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3381-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3381-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3379-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3381-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics