Abstract
The use of voluntary approaches to achieve environmental improvements has grown dramatically in the United States (U.S.) since they were first introduced thirteen years ago. As of 2004, there are over 50 voluntary programs in the U.S. at the federal level alone. These programs take a variety of forms, from large, cross-industry efforts to reduce global climate impacts to smaller, “boutique” efforts aimed at specific industrial sectors. Other voluntary approaches used in the U.S. include negotiated agreements, industry-initiated unilateral commitments, and state and regional voluntary initiatives, but these tend to be used less regularly.
Despite the diversity of voluntary approaches in the U.S., they often pursue common, and sometimes overlapping environmental objectives and use similar methodologies to achieve such goals. While most voluntary initiatives in the U.S. state an explicit environmental goal, they may also have less direct policy objectives such as enhancing innovation or increasing awareness of environmental issues.
Many argue in favour of the increased use of voluntary approaches in environmental policymaking on the basis of environmental effectiveness, economic efficiency, reductions in government administrative, monitoring and enforcement costs, increases in environmental awareness, and encouragement of innovation. Few programs have been evaluated properly on the basis of these objectives, however. The empirical literature sheds little light on the value of voluntary approaches in achieving goals set by U.S. environmental policy. The difficulty in evaluating voluntary approaches lies in sorting through the myriad of programs, identifying a discernible environmental goal, gathering adequate data for analysis, and measuring achievement of the environmental goal relative to a reasonable baseline scenario.
Keywords
- Environmental Awareness
- Environmental Management System
- Environmental Improvement
- Voluntary Program
- Environmental Goal
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
9. References
Alberini, A., & K. Segerson, K. (2002). Assessing Voluntary Programs to Improve Environmental Quality. Environmental and Resource Economics, 22, 157–184.
Arora, S., &. Cason, T. (1995). An Experiment in Voluntary Environmental Regulation: Participation in EPA's 33/50 Program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(3), 271–86.
Arora, S., & Gangopadhyay, S. (1995). Toward a Theoretical Model of Voluntary Overcompliance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 28(3), 289–309.
Bizer, K. (1999). Voluntary Agreements: Cost-Effective or Smokscreen for Failure? Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2(2), 147–165.
Blackman, A., & Mazurek, J. (2001). The Cost of Developing Site-Specific Environmental Regulations: Evidence from EPA's Project XL. Environmental Management, 27(1), 109–121.
Boyd, J. (1998). Searching for the Profit in Pollution Prevention: Case Studies in the Corporate Evaluation of Environmental Opportunities. Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, No. 98–30.
Brau, R., & Carraro, C. (1999). Voluntary Approaches, Market Structure, and Compeition. CAVA Working Paper, No 99/08/01.
Bui, L. (2003). Public Disclosure of Private Information as a Tool for Regulating the Environment: Firm Level Responses by Petroleum Refineries to the Toxic Releases Inventory. Working Paper, Boston University.
Chicago Climate Exchange (2004). Chicago Climate Exchange: About CCX. Retrieved Feb. 29, 2004 from www.chicagoclimatex.com/about
Croci, E. (2003). Voluntary Agreements for CO 2 Emissions Reduction, Evaluation & Perspectives. Energy & Environment, 14(5), 663–76.
Darnall, N., & Carmin, J. (2004). Greener and Cleaner? The Signaling Accuracy of U.S. Voluntary Environmental Programs, Working Paper, North Carolina State University.
DeCanio, S. (1994). Energy Efficiency and Managerial Performance: Improving Profitability while Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. In D. Feldman (ed.), Global Climate Change and Public Policy. (pp. 86–101). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Delmas, M., & Mazurek, J. (2003). A Transaction Cost Perspective on Negotiated Agreements: The Case of the U.S. EPA XL Program. In A. Baranzini, and P. Thalmann (eds.), Voluntary Approaches to Climate Protection. An Economic Assessment of Private-Public Partnerships. Edward Elgar.
Delmas, M., & Terlaak, A. (2002a). The Institutional Factors of Environmental Voluntary Agreements. In Hoffman and Ventresca (eds.), Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives. (pp. 346–366). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Fierman, J. (1991). The Big Muddle in Green Marketing. Fortune, June 3, 91.
General Accounting Office, GAO (1994). Toxic Substances: EPA Needs More Reliable Source Reduction Data and Progress Measures. Washington, DC: GAO.
GAO (1997). Challenges Facing EPA's Efforts to Reinvent Environmental Regulation. Washington DC: GAO.
GAO (1997). Information on the Results of Four of EPA's Voluntary Climate Change Programs. Washington DC: GAO
Glanchant, M. (1996). The Cost Efficiency of Voluntary Agreements for Regulating Industrial Pollution: A Coasean Approach. In C. Carraro and F. Leveques (eds.), Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy. Netherlands: Kluwer.
Hartman, R. (1988). Self-Selection Bias in the Evolution of Voluntary Energy Conservation Programs. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3), 448–458.
Horowitz, M. (2004). Electricity Intensity in the Commercial Sector: Market and Public Program Effects. Energy Journal, 25(2), 115–137.
Horowitz, M. (2001). Economic Indicators of Market Transformation: Energy Efficiency Lighting and EPA's Green Lights. Energy Journal, 22(4), 95–122.
Howard, J., Nash, J., & Ehrenfeld, J. (2000). Standard or Smokescreen? Implementation of a Voluntary Environmental Code. California Management Review, 42(2), 63–82
Inform (1995). Toxics Watch, 1995. New York.
Kappas, P. (1997). Industry Self-Regulation and Environmental Protection, Working Paper, University of California — Santa Barbara.
Khanna, M, &. Damon, L. (1999). EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38(1), 1–28.
King, A., & Lenox, M. (2000). Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanction: The Chemical Industries' Responsible Care Program. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 243–266.
Konar, S., & Cohen, M. (1997). Information as Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32(1), 109–24.
Konar, S., & Cohen, M. (2001). Does the Market Value Environmental Performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–89.
Lutz, S., Lyon, T., & Maxwell, J. (2000). Quality Leadership When Regulatory Standards Are Forthcoming. Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(3), 331–348.
Lyon, T., & Maxwell, J. (2001). Voluntary Approaches to Environmental Protection. In M. Franzini and A. Nicita (eds.), Environmental Economics: Past, Present and Future. Aldershot, Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
Lyon, T., & Maxwell, J. (2003). Self-Regulation, Taxation, and Public Voluntary Environmental Agreements. Journal of Public Economics, 87(7–8), 1453–1486.
Maitland, I. (1985). The Limits of Business Self-Regulation. California Management Review, 27(3, 132–147.
Maxwell, J., & Lyon, T. (1999). An Institutional Analysis of US Voluntary Environmental Agreements, Working Paper. Indiana University, 99–27.
Maxwell, J., Lyon, T., & Hackett, S. (2000). Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism. Journal of Law and Economics, 43(2), 583–618.
Mazurek, J. (1998). The Use of Voluntary Agreements in the United States: An Initial Survey. Paris: OECD, ENV/EPOC/GEE (98)27/Final.
Morgenstern, R. & Al-Jurf, S. (1999). Does the Provision of Free Technical Information Really Influence Firm Behaviour? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 61, 13–24.
Nadeau, L., Cantin, J., & Wells, R. (2003). Participation in Voluntary Programs, Corporate Reputation, and Intangible Value: Estimating the Value of Paticipating in the EPA's EnergyStar Program. Working Paper, June.
Nash, J. (2002). Industry Codes of Practice: Emergence and Evolution. In T. Dietz and P. Sterns (eds.), New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Academy of Public Administration, NAPA (1997). Resolving the Paradox of Environmental Protection. Washington, DC: NAPA.
Office of Technology Assessment (1991). Changing by Degrees: Steps to Reduce Greenhouse Gases. Washington, DC: OTA, OTA-O-482.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD (1999). Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: An Assessment. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2003). Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Usage in Policy Mixes. Paris: OECD.
Ozog, M., & Waldman, D. (1994). Weighting Nonrandom Samples in Voluntary Energy Conservation Program Evaluation. Energy Journal, 15(1), 129–41.
Segerson, K., & Miceli, T. (1998). Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Good or Bad News for Environmental Protection? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(2), 109–131.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. EPA (1996). 1994 Toxics Release Inventory, Public Data Release. Washington, D.C: EPA.
U.S. EPA (2002). Achievement Through Partnership: A Progress Report Through 2000. Washington, DC: EPA, EPA-240R-02-001.
U.S. EPA (2004a). Partners for the Environment: List of Programs. Retrieved Feb. 11, 2004 from www.epa.gov/partners/programs/index.htm
U.S. EPA (2004b). EPA's Energy Star: The Quality of Our Environment Is Everyone's Responsibility. Retrieved Feb. 24, 2004 from www.energystar.gov
U.S. EPA (2004c). EPA's WasteWise: Preserving Resources, Preventing Waste. Retrieved Feb. 24, 2004. from www.epa.gov/wastewise/index.htm
U.S. EPA (2004d). San Francisco Area Green Business Program. Retrieved Feb. 24, 2004 from www.epa.gov/region9/cross_pr/innovations/gbp.html
U.S. EPA (2004e). EPA's Project XL Program. Retrieved Feb. 24, 2004 from www.epa.gov/ProjectXL
Videras, J., & Alberini, A. (2000). The Appeal of Voluntary Environmental Programs: Which Firms Participate and Why? Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(4), 449–61.
Welch, E., Mazur A., & Bretschneider, S. (2000). Voluntary Behavior by Electric Utilities: Levels of Adoption and Contribution of the Climate Challenge Program to the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(3), 407–425.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brouhle, K., Griffiths, C., Wolverton, A. (2005). The Use of Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policymaking in the U.S.. In: Croci, E. (eds) The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements. Environment & Policy, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3356-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3356-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3355-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3356-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)