For-Profit Degree-Granting Colleges: Who are These Guys and What do They Mean for Students, Traditional Institutions, and Public Policy?

  • Carol Everly Floyd
Part of the Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research book series (HATR, volume 20)


High Education Community College Education Commission Postsecondary Institution National Accreditation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alliance for International Educational and Cultural Exchange and other Higher Education Associations (2003, May 28). Recommendations for Reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. Retrieved September 15, 2003 from Scholar
  2. Altbach, P.G. (2001, Fall). The rise of the pseudouniversity. International Higher Education. Retrieved September 30, 2002 from Scholar
  3. Ammons. D. (2004, March 16). Private colleges expect to compete for ‘high-demand.’ enrollment. Seattle Post-Intelligencer On-line. Retrieved March 16, 2004 from Scholar
  4. The American Council on Education, the Council on Higher Education Accreditation and the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers (2001). Joint Statement on the Transfer and Award of Credit. Retrieved February 2, 2004 from Scholar
  5. Bailey, T. (2003, May). The response of community colleges to increasing competition and growth of the for-profits. Paper presented at Columbia University Teachers College Conference: Markets, Profits, and The Future of Higher Education, New York, NY. Retrieved October 10, 2002 from Scholar
  6. Bailey, T., Badway, N., and Gumport, P.J. (2001). For-profit Higher Education and Community Colleges. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, National Center for Postsecondary Improvement. Retrieved October 10, 2003 from Scholar
  7. Blaney, D. (2004, April 2). Who should pay the bill for a private education? Chronicle of Higher Education B24.Google Scholar
  8. Blumenstyk, G. (2003, September 5). Companies’ graduate programs challenge colleges of education. Chronicle of Higher Education A30–A32.Google Scholar
  9. Blumenstyk, G. (2004, April 23). Biggest for-profit education company makes bid for the youth market. Chronicle of Higher Education A33.Google Scholar
  10. Blumenstyk, G. (2004, June 25). U. of Phoenix to Stoke Booming Growth by Competing for Traditional-Age College Students. Chronicle Daily. Retrieved June 25, 2004; from Scholar
  11. Breneman, D. (in press). The University of Phoenix: Icon of for-profit higher education. In D. Breneman (ed.), Earnings from Learning: The Rise of For-Profit Universities. Albany, NY: SUNY PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Breneman, D., Pusser, B., and Turner, S. (in press). The contemporary provision of for-profit higher education: Mapping the competitive market. In D. Breneman (ed.), Earnings from Learning: The Rise of For-Profit Universities. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carnevale, Dan. (2002, November 15). 12-hour rule, viewed as limiting distance education, expires. Chronicle of Higher Education A36.Google Scholar
  14. Carnevale, Dan. (2003, December 12). Education Department expands student-aid program for distance education. Chronicle of Higher Education A31.Google Scholar
  15. Chronicle index of for-profit higher education. Recent developments in for-profit higher education (2004, February 13). Chronicle Of Higher Education A27.Google Scholar
  16. “The contours of for-profit higher education” (2001, November/December). Change 47–60.Google Scholar
  17. Council for Higher Education Accreditation (2000, September) A statement to the community: Transfer and the public interest. Retrieved February 15, 2004 from Scholar
  18. Deil-Amen, R., and Rosenbaum, J.E. (2003a). Charter-building at low-status colleges: Charters as mechanisms of labor-market access for two-year college students. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  19. Deil-Amen, R., and Rosenbaum, J.E. (2003b). The social consequences of success: Can college reduce the need for social know-how? In J. Jacobs and K. Shaw (eds.), Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (Vol. 586, pp. 120–143).Google Scholar
  20. Eaton, J.S. (2001, March/April). Regional accreditation reform. Change 39–45.Google Scholar
  21. Education Commission of the States (2000a). Report from the regions: Accreditors’ perceptions of the role and impact of for-profit institutions of higher education. Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  22. Education Commission of the States (2000b). Survey analysis: State statutes and regulations governing the operation of degree-granting for-profit institutions of higher education. Denver, COGoogle Scholar
  23. Education Commission of the States (2001a). Meeting the Needs and Making Profits: The Rise of the For-profit Degree-granting Institutions. Denver CO.Google Scholar
  24. Education Commission of the States (2001b). The Rise of the For-profit Degree-granting Institutions: Policy Considerations for the States. Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  25. Farrell, E.F. (2002, November 4). Education Department eases rules on incentive payments to college recruiters. Chronicle Daily. Retrieved November 4, 2002 from www.chronicle.comGoogle Scholar
  26. Farrell; E.F. (2003, April 18). Signer beware. Chronicle of Higher Education A33–A34.Google Scholar
  27. Farrell, E.F. (2003, May 30). For-profit colleges see rising minority enrollments. Chronicle of Higher Education A35.Google Scholar
  28. Farrell, E.F. (2003, August 15). A common yardstick? The Bush administration wants to standardize accreditation; educators say it is too complex for that. Chronicle of Higher Education A25.Google Scholar
  29. Farrell, E.F. (2003, September 5). For-profit colleges back federal proposal to make transferring credits easier. Chronicle of Higher Education A26.Google Scholar
  30. Farrell. E.F. (2003, October 24). Health education receives mixed reviews. Chronicle of Higher Education A33.Google Scholar
  31. Farrell, E.F. (2004, January 16). For-profit colleges rush to fill nursing gap. Chronicle of Higher Education A29–A33.Google Scholar
  32. Farrell, E.F. (2004, February 13). Deeper pockets, different tactics. Chronicle of Higher Education A26–A29.Google Scholar
  33. Fisher, H. (2004, March 10). Panel OKs limited 4-year degrees for community colleges. Arizona Daily Sun On-Line. Retrieved March 10. 2004 from Scholar
  34. Foster, A. (2004, February 27). Limit on aid for distance education students may do more harm than good, congressional report says. Chronicle Daily. Retrieved February 27, 2004 from Scholar
  35. Haber, Gary. (2004, March 14). For profit colleges push federal bill to ease student transfers. Tampa Tribune On-line. Retrieved March 16, 2004 from Scholar
  36. Hebel, S. (2004, March 26). Led by Colorado, states weigh new approaches to financing colleges. Chronicle of Higher Education A26–A27.Google Scholar
  37. Heller, D. (2003, November 14). Not all institutions are alike. Chronicle of Higher Education B7–B9.Google Scholar
  38. Hentschke, G.C. (2003, Fall). For-profit postsecondary institutions: beyond the initial stereotypes. The Navigator: Directions and Trends in Higher Education Policy 1–3.Google Scholar
  39. June, A.W. (2004, March 12). ITT Educational Services is sued for fraud and searched by federal agents. Chronicle of Higher Education A29.Google Scholar
  40. June, A.W. (2004, June 24). SEC opens formal inquiry into Career Education. Chronicle Daily. Retrieved June 24, 2004 from Scholar
  41. Kaplan, W.A., and Lee, B.A. (1995). The law of higher education: a comprehensive guide to legal implications of administrative decision making. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  42. Kinser, K. (2001, November). Faculty at the University of Phoenix: A study of non-traditional roles. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of the Study for Higher Education, Richmond, VA.Google Scholar
  43. Kinser, K. (2003, November). A profile of regionally accredited for-profit institutions of higher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of the Study for Higher Education, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  44. Kinser, K. (in press). For profit higher education. Encyclopedia of Education and Human Development. Armonk NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  45. Kirp, D. (2003). Shakespeare, Einstein, and the Bottom Line: The Marketing of Higher Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Knapp, L.G., Kelly, J.E., Whitmore, R.W., Wu, S., and Gallego. L.M. (2003). Postsecondary Institutions in the United States: Fall 2002 and Degrees and Other Awards Conferred: 2001–02 (No. 2004-154). Washington, DC.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  47. Lechuga, V.M. (2003, November). Teachers of the night: Part-time faculty working environments at for-profit institutions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Portland, O.R.Google Scholar
  48. Lechuga, V.M., Tierney, W. G., and Hentschke, G. C. (2003). Expanding the Horizon: Forprofit Degree Granting Institutions of Higher Education: An Annotated Bibliography. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis, Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  49. Lee, J.B., and Merisotis, J.P. (1990). Proprietary Schools: Programs, Policies and Prospects. Washington, DC: George Washington University, ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.Google Scholar
  50. List of concerns and suggestions for improvement: The College Access and Opportunity Act HR 4283 (2004, May 26). Attachment to letter from David Ward to John Boehner and Howard McKeon. Retrieved June 2, 2004 from Scholar
  51. Marchese, T. (1998, May/June). Not-so distant competitors: How new providers are remaking the postsecondary marketplace. AAHE Bulletin 24–35.Google Scholar
  52. Miller, M.A. (2000, July/August). The marketplace and the village green. Change 4–5.Google Scholar
  53. Moore, D. (2003, November 14). Toward a single definition of college. Chronicle of Higher Education B7–B9.Google Scholar
  54. Morey, A. (2001). The growth of for-profit higher education. Journal of Teacher Education 52(4): 300–316.Google Scholar
  55. Morey, A. (2002, September). Globalization and the emergence of for-profit higher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Higher Education Researchers, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  56. Morgan, R. (2002, October 11). Lawmakers call for more accountability from accreditation system. Chronicle of Higher Education A28.Google Scholar
  57. National Center for Educational Statistics (2001, June). A Classification System for 2-Year Postsecondary Institutions. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
  58. Newman, F. (2000, September/October). Saving higher education’s soul. Change 16–23.Google Scholar
  59. Newman, F., and Couturier, L. (2001, September/October). The new competitive arena: Market forces invade the academy. Change 11–17.Google Scholar
  60. Peltier, M. (2004, April 23). Senate passes bill to let IRCC offer four-year degrees. TCPalm On-Line. Retrieved April 23, 2004 from,1651,TCP_16736_2830753,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
  61. Postsecondary Education Convening Authority (1975). Approaches to State Licensing of Private Degree-granting Institutions. Washington, DC: George Washington University.Google Scholar
  62. Pusser, B., and Doane, D.J. (2001, January/February). Public purpose and private enterprise: The contemporary organization of postsecondary education. Change 18–22.Google Scholar
  63. Pusser, B., and Turner, S.E. (2004). Nonprofit and for-profit governance in higher education. In R.G. Ehrenberg (ed.), Governing Academia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Pusser, B., and Wolcott, D.A. (in press). A crowded lobby: Nonprofit and for-profit universities in the emerging politics of higher education. In D. Breneman (ed.), Earnings from Learning: The Rise of For-Profit Universities. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  65. Raphael, J., and Tobias, S. (1997, November /December). Profit-making or profiteering? Proprietaries target teacher education. Change 19–22.Google Scholar
  66. Ruch, R.S. (2001). Higher Education, Inc: The Rise of the For-Profit University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Ruch, R.S. (2003). Lessons from the innovators: The for-profit sector In Higher Expectations. Washington, DC: National Governors Association. Retrieved December 21, 2003 from Scholar
  68. Sachdev, A. (2004, February 15). Law deans linked to accrediting task: ABA executives hired by schools. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved on February 16 from,1,4659624.story?coil=chi-business-hedGoogle Scholar
  69. Selingo, J. (2001, September 21). Aiming for a new audience, U. of Phoenix tries again in New Jersey. Chronicle of Higher Education A23–A24.Google Scholar
  70. Slaughter, S., and Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Slivka, M. (2004, March 18). Community colleges may offer 4-year degrees. Arizona Republic On-line. Retrieved March 18, 2004 from Scholar
  72. Smallwood, S. (2004, June 25). Tilting at Diploma Mills. Chronicle of Higher Education A17.Google Scholar
  73. Sperling, J., and Tucker, R.W. (1997, Fall Winter). Time for nationally authorized universities. NLII viewpoint. Retrieved October 25, 2003 from Scholar
  74. U.S. Department of Education. (2003, September). OFFICIAL cohort default rates for schools. Retrieved December 12. 2003 from Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol Everly Floyd
    • 1
  1. 1.Springfield

Personalised recommendations