Skip to main content

Literacies in Adolescence: An Analysis of Policies from the United States and Queensland, Australia

  • Chapter
International Handbook of Educational Policy

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 13))

Abstract

Look outside of the school walls in nearly every community and you will find examples of adolescents deeply engaged in literacy practices. In Australia, a young man composes a flyer for a lawn-mowing service (Knobel, 1999). Teenagers in Nepal exchange love letters mixing home and school languages (Ahearn, 2001). In the U.S. suburbs, youth race home to read and respond to each other’s web logs (or blogs), public journals that are proliferating among adolescents (Nussbaum, 2004). Shivering in his car, waiting to make a drug deal, a young man writes poetry to express his critique of the societal and institutional structures that constrain his life choices. Across town, his high school classmate composes a play in an afterschool club in order to make sense of her cousin’s untimely death (Schultz, 2003). In a range of settings, responding to a multitude of purposes and audiences, youth gather to document their lives through film, music, photographs, poetry, and political posters posted on the Internet, played out in public performances and written in private spaces they alone occupy. They offer critique and celebration, despair and optimism, unity and diversity

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Invitations to love: Literacy, love letters, and social change in Nepal. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allington, R. L. (2002). Big brother and the national reading curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anstey. M. (2002). New times, new literacies. Brisbane, Australia: Education Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: The University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., & Helderman, R. (2004, January 24). Va. seeks to leave Bush law behind: Republicans fight school mandates. The Washington Post, p. A.01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.) (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christman, J. B., & Rhodes, A. (2002). Civic engagement and urban school improvement: Hard-to-learn lessons from Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Queensland. (2000a). Literate futures: Report. Brisbane, Australia: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Queensland (2000b). Literate futures: The teacher summary version. Brisbane, Australia: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Queensland (2002a). Introducing literate futures: Reading. Brisbane: Australia, Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Queensland (2002b) Projects. Retrieved February 13th, 2004 from http://education.qld.au/curriculum/learning/literate-futures/projects.html

  • Education Queensland (2002c) Whole school literacy planning. Retrieved February 13th, 2004 from http://education.qld.au/curriculum/learning/literate-futures/wsl-planning.html

  • Fecho, B. (with A. Green), (2004). Learning as Aaron. In B. Fecho (Ed.), “Is this English?” Race, language, and culture in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., & Weis, L. (2003). Silenced voices and extraordinary conversations: Re-imagining schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. P. (2001). High school graduation rates in the United States. New York: Center for Civic Innovation at the Manhattan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. P., & Winters, M. A. (2002). Public school graduation rates in the United States (Civic Report #21), New York: Center for Civic Innovation at the Manhattan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H., & Kempen, H. (1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillocks, G. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G. (2003). Youth culture and digital media: New literacies for new times, Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 229–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research, Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 575–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (Eds.) (2002). School’s Out!: Bridging out-of-school literacy with classroom practices: New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., & Zacher, J. (in press). What is after-school worth? Developing literacies and identities out-of-school, Voices in urban education. Annenberg Institute for School Reform. Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Reading Association. (2001). On US government policy on the teaching of reading. Retrieved March 24th, 2004 from http://www.reading.org/positions/reading_policy.html

  • Knobel, M. (1999). Everyday literacies: Students, discourse, and social practice. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, P. (1998). Race, class, and power in school restructuring. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2002). What happens to literacies old and new when they’re turned into policy. In D. E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. (2003, September). NAACP opposition to school vouchers. Retrieved on March 23rd, 2004 from http://www.naacp.org/work/washington_bureau/schoolVouchers093003.shtml

  • National Center for Education Statistics (2000). Dropout rates in the United States: 2000, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of La Raza (2002). The No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for local educators and advocates for Latino students, families, and communities. Retrieved February 13th, 2004 from http://www.nclr.org/policy/briefs/IB8NoChildLeft.pdf

  • National Council of Teachers of English (2002, November). NCTE resolution on the Reading First initiative. Retrieved February 13th, 2004 from http://www.ncte.org/about/press/rel/107601.html.

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, E. (2004, January 11). My so-called blog. New York Times (Section 6, p. 33).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orfield, G. (2004). Introduction. In G. L. Sunderland & J. Kim (Eds.), Inspiring vision, disappointing results: Four studies on implementing the No Child Left Behind Act. Retrieved February 15th, 2004 from http://www.civilrightsproject.harvard.edu/

  • Paulson, A. (2004, February 11). An education rebellion stirring. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved February 15th, 2004 from http://www.csmonitor.com/

  • Pintaone-Hernandez, A. (2002). Literacy narratives toward identity and community in a first-grade classroom. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, U.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Research for Action. (2002). Lessons from Philadelphia about building civic capacity for school reform. Philadelphia, PA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, K. (2002). Looking across space and time: Reconceptualizing literacy learning in and out of school. Research in the Teaching of English, 36(3), 356–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, K. (2003). Listening: A framework for teaching across differences. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, K., & Vasudevan, L. (in preparation). Multi-media storytelling as method: Insights from documenting the literacy practices of youth in and out of school.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, S. (2003, October 12). “No Child Left Behind:” law bumps into hard reality. The Philadelphia Inquirer, p. A01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. V. (1993). (Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schultz, K., Fecho, B. (2005). Literacies in Adolescence: An Analysis of Policies from the United States and Queensland, Australia. In: Bascia, N., Cumming, A., Datnow, A., Leithwood, K., Livingstone, D. (eds) International Handbook of Educational Policy. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3201-3_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics