Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Barriers to Adoption of Novel Environmental Technologies: Contaminated Sediments

  • Conference paper
Strategic Management of Marine Ecosystems

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series IV: Earth and Environmental Series ((NAIV,volume 50))

Abstract

New technologies face high barriers to adoption compared to existing technologies for several reasons including a perceived sense of increased risk, a lack of experience with the new technologies among managers and/or regulators, or simply the fact that decision makers are not aware of the availability of the technology. Environmental technologies, however, may be especially difficult to move from innovation to commercialization. Partly this may be because environmental resources exist largely in the public domain where private industry may be unable to fully capture the economic benefits of novel technologies. But also, it may be because environmental projects often involve multiple stakeholder groups with competing or mutually exclusive interests. No single technology is likely to emerge which is perceived by all stakeholders as superior to all competing alternatives on all decision criteria. Therefore, novel technologies are likely to involve tradeoffs that engender both support and objections. This chapter provides a review of some of the difficulties in implementing novel contaminated sediments technologies in the marketplace. Brief descriptions of several technologies are provided, and the contrasting objectives and perspectives of different groups essential to environmental innovation are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

8. References

  1. Anderson AR. 1998. Cultivating the Garden of Eden: Environmental entrepreneuring. J Organization Change Management. 11(2):135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biogenesis Enterprises, Inc. and Roy F. Weston, Inc.. 1999. BioGenesisSM Sediment Washing Technology Full-Scale, 40 Cy/Hr, Sediment Decontamination Facility For The NY/NJ Harbor. Final Report On The Pilot Demonstration Project.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crittenden J. 2002. Engineering the quality of life. Clean Tech Env Policy. 4:6–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dalton JL, Gardner KH, Seager TP, Weimer ML, Spear JCM, Magee BJ. 2004. Properties of Portland cement made from contaminated sediments. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 41:227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Douthwaite B, Keatinge JDH, Park JR, Why Promising Technologies Fail: The Neglected Role of User Innovation During Adoption, Research Policy, 2001, 30(5):819–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eggers DM, Villani J, Andres R. 2000. Third party information provider and innovative environmental technology adoption. Amer. Behavioral Scientist. 44(2):265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fountain J. 1998. Social capital: A key enabler of innovation. In Investing for Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy that Works edited by Branscomb LM and Keller JH. MIT Press: Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greve A, Salaff, JW. 2003. Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship—Theory And Practice. 28(1):1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gittell R, Thompson P. 2002. Making social capital work: Social capital and community economic development in Social Capital and Poor Communities, edited by Saegert S, Thompson P, Warren M. Russell Sage Foundation Press: New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hagedoorn J, Cloodt M, Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?, Research Policy, 32(8):1365–1379.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heaton GR, Banks RD. 1998. Toward a new generation of environmental technology. In Investing for Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy that Works edited by Branscomb LM and Keller JH. MIT Press: Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hostager TJ, Neil TC. 1998. Seeing environmental opportunities: Effects of intrapreneurial ability, efficacy, motivation, and desirability. J Organizational Change Management. 11(1): 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. JCI/UPCYCLE Associates, LLC. 2002. Final Summary Report: Sediment Decontamination and Beneficial Use Pilot Project. Prepared for New Jersey Department of Transportation (Project AO# 9350203), Office of Maritime Resources and USEPA Region 2 through Brookhaven National Laboratory (Contract No. 48172).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jelinek M. 1996. 'Thinking technology’ in mature industry firms: Understanding technology entrepreneurship. Int. J Technology Management, 11(7–8):799–813.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kassicieh SK, Radosevich HR, Banbury, CM. 1998. Using attitudinal, situational, and personal characteristics variables to predict future entrepreneurs from national laboratory inventors. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 44(3):248–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Keough PD, Polonsky MJ. 1998. Environmental commitment: A basis for environmental entrepreneurship? J Organizational Change Management. 11(1):38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krueger N. 1998. Encouraging the identification of environmental opportunities. J Organization Change Management. 11(2):174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Larson EV, Brahmakulam IT. 2001. Partnerships: Building a New Foundation for Innovation: Results of a Workshop for the National Science Foundation. Rand Corporation: Arlington VA. http://www.rand.org/publications/DRU/DRU2651/

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lober DJ. 1998. Pollution prevention as corporate entrepreneurship. J Organizational Change Management. 11(1):26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Melton J. 2004. Personal communication, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Melton JS, Crannell BS, Eighmy TT, Wilson C, Reible DD, 2003. Field Trial of the UNH Phosphate-Based Reactive Barrier Capping System for the Anacostia River, EPA Grant Number: R819165-01-0

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mohr R. 2001. Environmental Policy and the Adoption of Technology. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Texas at Austin: Austin TX.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman CJ. 2002. Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge UK.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Murray F. 2004. The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy. Article in press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pastakia A. 1998. Grassroots ecopreneurs: Change agents for a sustainable society. J Organization Change Management. 11(2):157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and New York / New Jersey Clean Ocean and Shore Trust. 2003. The Use Of Dredged Material In Abandoned Mine Reclamation. Final report for the Bark Camp demonstration project.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sadat Associates, Inc. 2001.Use of Dredged Materials for the Construction of Roadway Embankments. submitted to New Jersey Maritime Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Siegel DS, Waldman D, Link A, Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study, Research Policy, 2003, 32:27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vohora A, Wright M, Lockett A. 2004. Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies, Research Policy, 33:147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Contaminated Sediments Research, Gregg Hall, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA

    T.P. Seager & K.H. Gardner

Authors
  1. T.P. Seager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K.H. Gardner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Holon Academic Institute of Technology, Holon, Israel

    Eugene Levner

  2. Cambridge Environmental Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA

    Igor Linkov

  3. INRIA, Metz, France

    Jean-Marie Proth

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Seager, T., Gardner, K. (2005). Barriers to Adoption of Novel Environmental Technologies: Contaminated Sediments. In: Levner, E., Linkov, I., Proth, JM. (eds) Strategic Management of Marine Ecosystems. NATO Science Series IV: Earth and Environmental Series, vol 50. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3198-X_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation