Two Basic Kinds of Cooperation

  • Raimo Tuomela
Part of the Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science book series (LEUS, volume 2)


Joint Action Collectivity Condition Joint Plan Collective Goal Full Cooperation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bratman M. (1992). “Shared Cooperative Activity”, The Philosophical Review 101, 327–341.Google Scholar
  2. Bowles S. (1998). “Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions”, Journal of Economic Literature XXXVI, 75–111.Google Scholar
  3. Harsanyi J. (1977). Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hume D. (1965) (orig. 1740). A Treatise of Human Nature, L.A. Selby-Bigge (ed.). Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Lewis D. (1969). Convention, A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Moulin H. (1995). Cooperative Microeconomics: A Game-Theoretic Introduction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Pettit P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Rawls J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Roemer J. (1996). Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Tuomela R. (1985a). “The Components of Social Control”, Quality and Quantity 19, 1–51.Google Scholar
  11. Tuomela R. (1993). “What is Cooperation?”, Erkenntnis 38, 87–101.Google Scholar
  12. Tuomela R. (1995). The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions. Stanford Series in Philosophy, Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Tuomela R. (2000). Cooperation: A Philosophical Study. Philosophical Studies Series, Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Tuomela R. (2002a). The Philosophy of Social Practices: A Collective Acceptance View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Tuomela R. (2002b). “The We-mode and the I-mode”, in F. Schmitt (ed.), Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality (2003). Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 93–127.Google Scholar
  16. Tuomela R. (2002c). “Joint Intention and Commitment”, in Meggle G. (ed.), Social Facts & Collective Intentionality, in German Library of Sciences, Philosophical Research, 1: 385–418. Frankfurt: Dr. Hänsel-Hohenhausen AG.Google Scholar
  17. Tuomela R. and Bonnevier-Tuomela M. (1997). “From Social Imitation to Teamwork”, in Holmstrom-Hintikka, G. and Tuomela R. (eds.), Contemporary Action Theory, Vol. II: Social Action. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
  18. Tuomela R. and Tuomela M. (2004), “Cooperation and Trust in Group Context”, ms, available at Scholar
  19. Tyler T. and Blader S. (2000). Cooperation in Groups. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  20. Van Vugt M., Snyder M., Tyler T. and Biel A. (2000). Cooperation in Modern Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raimo Tuomela
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinki

Personalised recommendations