From Computing with Numbers to Computing with Words — from Manipulation of Measurements to Manipulation of Perceptions

  • Lofti Zadeh
Part of the Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science book series (LEUS, volume 2)


Fuzzy Number Canonical Form Information Granulation Fuzzy Graph Fuzzy Constraint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berenji H.R. (1994). “Fuzzy Reinforcement Learning and Dynamic Programming”, Fuzzy Logic in Artificial Intelligence (A.L. Ralescu, Ed.), Proc. IJCAI’93 Workshop, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  2. Black M. (1963). “Reasoning with Loose Concepts”, Dialog 2, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  3. Bosch P. (1978). Vagueness, Ambiguity and all the Rest, Sprachstruktur, Individuum und Gesselschaft (M. Van de Velde and W. Vandeweghe, Eds.). Tubingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  4. Bowen J., Lai R. and Bahler D. (1992a). “Fuzzy semantics and fuzzy constraint networks”, Proceedings of the 1st IEEE Conference on Fuzzy Systems, San Francisco, pp. 1009–1016.Google Scholar
  5. Bowen J., Lai R. and Bahler D. (1992b). “Lexical imprecision in fuzzy constraint networks”, Proc. Nat. Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 616–620.Google Scholar
  6. Cresswell M.J. (1973). Logic and Languages. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  7. Dubois D., Fargier H. and Prade H. (1993). “The Calculus of Fuzzy Restrictions as a Basis for Flexible Constraint Satisfaction”, Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. San Francisco, pp. 1131–1136.Google Scholar
  8. ____ (1994). Propagation and Satisfaction of Flexible Constraints, Fuzzy Sets, Neural Networks, and Soft Computing (R.R. Yager, L.A. Zadeh, Eds.) New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 166–187.Google Scholar
  9. ____ (1996). “Possibility Theory in Constraint Satisfaction Problems: Handling Priority, Preference and Uncertainty”, Applied Intelligence 6:4, pp. 287–309.Google Scholar
  10. Freuder E.C. and Snow P. (1990). Improved Relaxation and Search Methods for Approximate Constraint Satisfaction with a Maximin Criterion, Proceedings of the 8th Biennial Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence, Ontario, pp. 227–230.Google Scholar
  11. Goguen J.A. (1969). “The Logic of Inexact Concepts”, Synthese 19, pp. 325–373.Google Scholar
  12. Hobbs J.R. (1978). “Making Computation Sense of Montague’s Intensional Logic”, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 9, pp. 287–306.Google Scholar
  13. Katai O., Matsubara S., Masuichi H., Ida M., et al. (1992). “Synergetic Computation for Constraint Satisfaction Problems Involving Continuous and Fuzzy Variables by Using Occam, Transputer/Occam”, (S. Noguchi and H. Umeo, Eds.), Proc. 4th Transputer/Occam Int. Conf., Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 146–160.Google Scholar
  14. Kaufmann A. and Gupta M.M. (1985). Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications, New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  15. Klir G. and Yuan B. (1995). Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Lano K. (1991). “A Constraint-Based Fuzzy Inference System”. Proc. 5th Portuguese Conf. Artificial Intelligence, EPIA’91 (P. Barahona, L.M. Pereira, and A. Porto, Eds.), Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 45–59.Google Scholar
  17. Lodwick W.A. (1990). “Analysis of Structure in Fuzzy Linear Programs”, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 38:1, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
  18. Mamdani E.H. and Gaines B. R., Eds. (1981). Fuzzy Reasoning and its Applications. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mares M. (1994). Computation Over Fuzzy Quantities, Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  20. Novak V. (1991). “Fuzzy Logic, Fuzzy Sets, and Natural Languages”, International Journal of General Sysems 20:1, pp. 83–97.Google Scholar
  21. Novak V., Ramik M., Cerny M. and Nekola J., Eds. (1992). Fuzzy Approach to Reasoning and Decision-Making, Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  22. Oshan M.S., Saad O.M. and Hassan A.G. (1995). “On the Solution of Fuzzy Multiobjective Integer Linear Programming Problems With a Parametric Study”, Adv. Modell. Anal. A, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 49–64.Google Scholar
  23. Partee B. (1976). Montague Grammar, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Pedrycz W. and Gomide F. (1998). Introduction to Fuzzy Sets, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 38–40.Google Scholar
  25. Qi G. and Friedrich G. (1992). “Extending Constraint Satisfaction Problem Solving in Structural Design”, 5th Int. Conf. Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, IEA/AIE-92 (F. Belli and F.J. Radermacher, Eds.), Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 341–350.Google Scholar
  26. Rasiowa H. and Marek M. (1989). “On Reaching Consensus by Groups of Intelligent Agents”, Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (Z.W. Ras, Ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 234–243.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenfeld A., Hummel R.A. and Zucker S.W. (1976). “Scene Labeling by Relaxation Operations”, IEEE Transactions on systems man and cybernetics, Vol. 6, pp. 420–433.Google Scholar
  28. Sakawa M., Sawada K. and Inuiguchi M. (1995). “A Fuzzy Satisficing Method for Large-Scale Linear Programming Problems with Block Angular Structure”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 399–409.Google Scholar
  29. Shafer G. (1976). A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Tong S.C. (1994). “Interval Number and Fuzzy Number Linear Programming”, Adv. Modell. Anal. A, 20:2, pp. 51–56.Google Scholar
  31. Vallée R. (1995). Cognition et système. Paris: l’Interdisciplinaire Système(s).Google Scholar
  32. Yager R.R. (1989). “Some Extensions of Constraint Propagation of Label Sets”, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 3, pp. 417–435.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. Zadeh L.A. (1961). “From Circuit Theory to System Theory”, Proc. of the Institute of Radio Engineers 50, pp. 856–865.Google Scholar
  34. ____ (1965). Fuzzy sets, Information and Control 8, pp. 338–353.Google Scholar
  35. ____ (1968). “Probability Measures of Fuzzy Events”, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 23, pp. 421–427.Google Scholar
  36. ____ (1972). “A Fuzzy—Set-Theoretic Interpretation of Linguistic Hedges”, Journal of Cybernetics 2, pp. 4–34.Google Scholar
  37. ____ (1973). “Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex System and Decision Processes”, IEEE Transactions on systems man and cybernetics SMC-3, pp. 28–44.Google Scholar
  38. ____ (1974). On the Analysis of Large Scale Systems, Systems Approaches and Environment Problems (H. Gottinger, Ed.). Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, pp. 23–37.Google Scholar
  39. ____ (1975a). Calculus of Fuzzy Restrictions, Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes, (L.A. Zadeh, K.S. Fu, M. Shimura, Eds.). New York: Academic Press, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
  40. ____ (1975b). “The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning”, Part I: Information Sciences 8, pp. 199–249; Part II: Inf. Sci. 8, pp. 301–357; Part III: Inf. Sci. 9, pp. 43–80.Google Scholar
  41. ____ (1976). “A Fuzzy-Algorithmic Approach to the Definition of Complex or Imprecise Concepts”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 8, pp. 249–291.Google Scholar
  42. ____ (1978a). “Fuzzy Sets as a Basis for a Theory of Possibility”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
  43. ____ (1978b). “PRUF — A Meaning Representation Language for Natural Languages”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 10, pp. 395–460.Google Scholar
  44. ____ (1979a). Fuzzy Sets and Information Granularity, Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications (M. Gupta, R. Ragade and R. Yager, Eds.). Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
  45. ____ (1979b). “A Theory of Approximate Reasoning”, Machine Intelligence 9 (J. Hayes, D. Michie and L.I. Mikulich, Eds.). New York: Halstead Press, pp. 149–194.Google Scholar
  46. ____ (1981). Test-Score Semantics for Natural Languages and Meaning Representation via PRUF, Empirical Semantics (B. Rieger, W. Germany, Eds.), Brockmeyer, pp. 281–349. Also Technical Report Memorandum 246, AI Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
  47. ____ (1982). “Test-Score Semantics for Natural Languages”, Proc. 9-th Int. Conf. Computational Linguistics, Prague, pp. 425–430.Google Scholar
  48. ____ (1984). “Syllogistic Reasoning in Fuzzy Logic and its Application to Reasoning with Dispositions”, Proc. Int. Symp. Multiple-Valued Logic, Winnipeg, Canada, pp. 148–153.Google Scholar
  49. ____ (1986). “Outline of a Computational Approach to Meaning and Knowledge Representation Based on a Concept of a Generalized Assignment Statement”. Proc. International Seminar on Artificial Intelligence and Man-Machine Systems (M. Thoma and A. Wyner, Eds.) Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 198–211.Google Scholar
  50. ____ (1994). “Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks and Soft Computing”, Communications of the ACM 37:3, pp. 77–84.Google Scholar
  51. ____ (1996a). Fuzzy Logic and the Calculi of Fuzzy Rules and Fuzzy Graphs: A Precise, Multiple Valued Logic 1, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
  52. ____ (1996b). “Fuzzy Logic = Computing with Words”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 4, pp. 103–111.Google Scholar
  53. ____ (1997). “Toward a Theory of Fuzzy Information Granulation and its Centrality in Human Reasoning and Fuzzy Logic”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 90, pp. 111–127.Google Scholar
  54. ____ (1998). “Maximizing Sets and Fuzzy Markoff Algorithms”, IEEE Transactions on systems man and cybernetics Part C — Applications and Reviews 28, pp. 9–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IEEE 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lofti Zadeh
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations