Skip to main content

Attempt, Success and Action Generation: A Logical Study of Intentional Action

  • Chapter
Logic, Thought and Action

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ((LEUS,volume 2))

Abstract

Contemporary philosophers have broadly studied intentional actions that agents attempt to perform in the world. However, logicians of action have tended to neglect the intentionality proper to human action. I will present here the basic principles and laws of a logic of individual action where intentional actions are primary as in contemporary philosophy of action. In my view, any action that an agent performs unintentionally could in principle have been attempted. Moreover any unintentional action of an agent is an effect of intentional actions of that agent. So my logic of action contains a theory of attempt and of action generation. As Belnap pointed out, action, branching time and historic modalities are logically related. There is the liberty of voluntary action. I will then work out a logic of action that is compatible with indeterminism.

Propositions with the same truth conditions are not the contents of the same attitudes of human agents. For that reason I will exploit the resources of a non classical modal and temporal predicative propositional logic capable of distinguishing the contents of intentional actions which are different. My primary purpose is enrich the logic of agency so as to adequately characterize attempts, intentional actions and the different kinds of action generation.

A first draft of this paper has been published in the special issue on Mental Causation of Manuscrito Vol XXV, 2002 pp 323–356). I thank Manuscrito for granting permission to republish the paper here. I am also grateful to Elias Alves, Nuel Belnap, Jean Caelen, Paul Gochet, Hans Kamp, J-Nicolas Kaufmann, André Leclerc, Ken MacQueen, Raymond Klibansky, Michel Paquette, Giovanni Queiroz, John Searle, Philippe de Rouilhan, Candida Jaci de Sousa Melo and Denis Vernant for their critical remarks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Belnap N. & Perloff M. (1990). “Seeing to it: a Canonical Form for Agentives”, in Kyburg H.E. et al, Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap N. & Perloff M. (1992). “The Way of the Agent”, Studia Logica, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap N., Perloff M. & Ming Xu (2001). Facing the Future Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman M. (1987). Intentions, Plans and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R. (1956). Meaning and Necessity. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chellas B.F. (1992). “Time and Modality in the Logic of Agency”. Studia Logica, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson D. (1980). Essays on Action & Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A. (1970). A Theory of Human Action. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horty J.F. “An Alternative stit Operator” Unpublished seminar notes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus R. Barcan (1983). Modalities. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague R. (1974). Formal Philosophy. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior A.N. (1967). Past, Present, Future. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle J.R. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____ (2001). Rationality in Action. A Bradford Book, MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle J.R. & Vanderveken D. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason R. (1984). “Combinations of Tense and Modality”, in D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason R. & A. Gupta (1980). “A Theory of Conditionals in the Context of Branching Time”, Philosophical Review, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderveken D. (1990–91). Meaning and Speech Acts, Volume I: Principles of Language Use and Volume II: Formal Semantics of Success and Satisfaction. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____ (1997). “Formal Pragmatics of Non Literal Meaning”, in the special issue Pragmatik of Linguistische Berichte edited by E. Rolf, 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____ “Propositional Identity, Truth According to Predication and Strong Implication”, Chapter 10 of the present volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____ (2001). “Universal Grammar and Speech Act Theory” in D. Vanderveken & S. Kubo, Essays in Speech Act Theory, Benjamins, P&b ns 77, 25–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____ (2003). Attempt and Action Generation Towards the Foundations of the Logic of Action in Cahiers d’espistémologie 2003:02. Montréal: UQAM. 43 pages. www.philo.uqam.ca

    Google Scholar 

  • ____ (2004). “Success, Satisfaction and Truth in the Logic of Speech Acts and Formal Semantics”, in S. Davis & B. Gillan (eds), A Reader in Semantics, forthcoming at Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____ Propositions, Truth and Thought. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann J. & Morgenstern O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vanderveken, D. (2002). Attempt, Success and Action Generation: A Logical Study of Intentional Action. In: Vanderveken, D. (eds) Logic, Thought and Action. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3167-X_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics