Skip to main content

Human Subject Protections

Some Thoughts on Costs and Benefits in the Humanistic Disciplines

  • Chapter
  • 641 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Association of University Professors. “Protecting Human Beings: Institutional Review Boards and Social Science Research.” Academe (May/June 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Paul. "Simple Gifts: Ethical Issues In The Conduct of Person-Based Composition Research.” College Composition and Communication 49, no. 1 (February 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, H.K. “Ethics and Clinical Research,” New England Journal of Medicine 274 (1966): 1354–1360.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Begley, S. “Science Journal.” The Wall Street Journal (November 1, 2002): B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45. Public Welfare Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Office For Protection from Research Risks, Part 46: “Protection of Human Subjects.” Revised November 13, 2001; Effective December 13, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G.B. “Exempt Research and Research that may Undergo Expedited Review.” Office for Protection from Research Risks (May 5, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmer-Dewitt, P. “Cloning: Where Do We Draw the Line?” Time Magazine (November 8, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. 21 USCA §301 et seq. (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkin, Mathew W. “Academic Freedom and the Prevention of Harm in Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities.” Illinois Conference Proceedings (2003). Available on conference website: http://www.law.uiuc.edu/conferences/humansubject/index.asp

    Google Scholar 

  • “Guidelines for the Ethical Treatment of Students and Student Writing in Composition Studies.” Conference on College Composition and Communication 52 (2000): 485–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunsalus, C.K. “An Examination of Issues Presented by Proposals to Unify and Expand Federal Oversight of Human Subject Research.” National Bioethics Advisory Commission paper. September 1998. D–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. “Thinking About Two People Talking.” Ethics and Behavior (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, K.R. and K.C. Dougherty. “Ethics, Institutional Review Boards, and the Changing Face of Educational Research.” Educational Researcher 22, no. 9 (1993): 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, Laud. Tearoom Trade. Chicago: Aldine, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J.H. Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York: New York Free Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R.J. “The Boundaries Between Biomedical or Behavioral Research and the Accepted and Routine Practice of Medicine.” The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. “Ethical Issues Raised by Students’ Personal Writing.” College English 60 (March 1998): 318–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bioethics Advisory Commission. “Cloning Human Beings: Ethical Considerations.” June 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. “Ethical Issues in Human Stem-Cell Research.” September 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. Full Commission Meeting. Arlington, Virginia: May 17, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. “The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research.” DHEW Publication No. (OS) 78-0008.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health, Office of Extramural Research, Office for Protection from Research Risks. Protecting Human Research Subjects: Institutional Review Board Guidebook. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimi, Robyn Y. (Senior Associate, Office of Technology Assessment). Testimony at the Hearing Before the Legislation and National Security Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 28, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Human Research Protection. Guidance Letter. September 22, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Protecting Human Beings: Institutional Review Boards and Social Science Research.” Academe (May/June 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Puglisi, Tom (Office for Protection from Research Risks). Personal communication. September 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Researchers Seek Answers After Gene-Therapy Patient Dies.” The Pennsylvania Gazette (November/December 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Revitalization Act of 2002. (§ 3060).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D.J. Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making. New York: Basic Books, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Should All Disciplines Be Subject to the Common Rule?: Human Subjects of Social Science Research.” Academe (May/June 2002): 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics, Special Working Committee to the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. “Giving Voice to the Spectrum.” June 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, J., S. Plattner, and P. Rubin. “How (Not) to Regulate Social and Behavioral Research.” Professional Ethics Report 2 (Spring 2002): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavris, C. Skeptical Inquirer 26 (July/Aug 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, N.W. “Clients’ and Students’ Stories: Avoiding Exploitation and Complying with the Law to Produce Scholarship with Integrity.” Clinical Law Review 5 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gunsalus, C.K. (2005). Human Subject Protections. In: Galston, A.W., Peppard, C.Z. (eds) Expanding Horizons in Bioethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3062-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3062-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3061-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3062-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics