Conclusion
To summarise, this chapter has argued that although words like fun and pleasure are closely related and may each function as a superordinate category for the other, there are experiential and cultural differences between them. Fun has been considered in terms of distraction and pleasure in terms of absorption. This is not to suggest that pleasure is a more worthy pursuit than fun, it is rather an attempt to delineate different but equally important aspects of enjoyment. It is possible to appreciate Shakespeare and still acknowledge that The Simpsons is the greatest achievement of western civilisation. Both offer rich and fulfilling experiences but they are very different kinds of pleasures. As Peter Wright and John McCarthy argue elsewhere in this book, it is not possible to design an experience, only to design for an experience; but in order to do this it is necessary to have an understanding of that experience as it relates to and differs from others.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1986). Dialectic of Englightenment. London: Verso.
Bateson, G. (Ed.). (1972). Steps To An Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: The Experience of Work and Play in Games. San Fancisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
Debord, G. (1995). The society of the spectacle. New York: Zone Books.
Devereaux, M. (2001). The Philosophical Status Of Aesthetics. Available: http://aestheticsonline.org/ideas/devereaux.html.
Goffman, E. (1972). Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Jackson, P. (1998). John Dewey and the Lessons of Art: Yale University Press.
Jordan, P. (2000). Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors: Taylor and Francis.
Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic quality (pp. 3–25). New York: Sage.
Laurel, B. (1993). Computer as Theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Monk, A. F., Hassenzahl, M., Blythe, M., & Reed, D. (2002). Funology: designing enjoyment. Paper presented at the CHI. p.p. 924–5
Oxford English Dictionary. Available at: http://dictionary.oed.com/entrance.dtl
Roijec, C. (1985). Capitalism and Leisure Theory. London: Tavistock.
Rozin, P. (1999). Preadaption and the puzzles and properties of pleasure. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 109–133). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Self, W. (1994). My idea of Fun. London: Penguin books.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology: An Introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.
Skynner, R., & Cleese, J. (1993). Life And How To Survive It. London: Methuen.
Thompson, E. P. (1963). The Making Of The English Working Class. London: Gollancz.
Willis, P. (1990). Common Culture: Open University Press.
Willis, P. (2000). The Ethnographic Imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blythe, M., Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The Semantics of Fun: Differentiating Enjoyable Eeperiences. In: Blythe, M.A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A.F., Wright, P.C. (eds) Funology. Human-Computer Interaction Series, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2966-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2967-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)