Fun on the Phone: The Situated Experience of Recreational Telephone Conferences
Fun in telephone conferences in this analysis is defined in relation to what it is not: having fun is a matter of transforming the (necessarily) formal structured basis of activity into moments of triviality and playfulness. And as such it complements early sociological appreciation of play as not work. However by understanding fun as the consequence of particular interpretive transformations in ongoing interaction, our sociology of fun becomes a dynamic conceptualisation: fun is always interactionally achieved by active social actors.
Our investigation of telephone conferences through applied or directed CA allows an appreciation of the interactionally situated experience of fun. A question might be how these insights benefit the future design effort. One way is that they can be recruited to inform experimental interventions. For example we might ask how changes in the opening routines affect interaction patterns and see if fluidity can be reached more quickly.
On a more general note, we might ask how we can make telephone conferences more ‘fun’. Initial answers appear counter-intuitive: fun is tied to engendering structure, and allowing for its re-framing; to have fun, we have to have seriousness first.
KeywordsFrame Analysis Natural Frame Telephone Conference Primary Frame Primary Framework
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Atkinson, J.M. (1982). Understanding Formality: Notes on the Categorisation and Production of ‘Formal’ Interaction. British Journal of Sociology 33, 86–117.Google Scholar
- Bateson, G. (1972). Steps To An Ecology of Mind, New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
- Beach, W.A. (1990). Language As and In Technology: Facilitating Topic Organization in Videotex Focus Group Meeting. In: Medhurst, M.J., Gonzalez, A. and Peterson, T.R., (Eds.) Communication and the Culture of Technology, pp. 197–219. Pullman: Washington State University PressGoogle Scholar
- Bruner, J.S. (1976). Nature and uses of immaturity. In: Bruner, J.S., Jolly, A. and Sylva, K., (Eds.) Play. Its role in development and evolution, pp. 28–64. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Drew, P. (1987) Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25, 219–53.Google Scholar
- Glenn, P.J. and Knapp, M.L. (1987). The interactive framing of play in adult conversation. Communication Quarterly 35, 48–66.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience, Boston: North Eastern University Press.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1961). Fun in Games. In: Goffman, E., (Ed.) Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction, pp. 15–81. Indianapolis: Bob MerrilGoogle Scholar
- Hopper, R. (1992). Telephone Conversation, Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Huizinga, J. (1949). Homo Ludens, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Lemert, C. and Branaman, A. (1997). The Goffman Reader, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
- Manning, P. (1992). Erving Goffman and Modern Sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Reed, D.J. (2002). Observing and Quoting Newsgroup Messages: Method and Phenomenon in the Hermeneutic Spiral. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis.Google Scholar
- Sacks, H. (1974). The Analysis of the Course of A Joke’s Telling In Conversation. In: Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J., (Eds.) Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, pp. 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on Conversation. Volume 1&2, Oxford UK; Cambridge USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Schwartzman, H. (1978). Transformations: The Anthropology of Children’s Play, New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Slater, D. (1998). Work/Leisure. In: Jenks, C., (Ed.) Core Sociological Dichotomies, pp. 391–404. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Stephenson, W. (1967). The Play Theory of Mass Communication, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Sutton-Smith, B. (1988). Introduction to the transaction edition. In: Stephenson, W., (Ed.) The Play Theory of Mass Communication, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Williams, R. (1998). Erving Goffman. In: Stones, R., (Ed.) Key Sociological Thinkers, pp. 151–162. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar