Science on the Periphery: Bridging the Information Divide
Scientists in developing countries have access to only a tiny fraction of the information they need, and their own contribution to science is hardly noticed by others. It is important that these countries strengthen their scientific research and that their scientists become fully integrated members of the worldwide network of science. But, unfortunately, the transformations effected in the conduct of science with the advent of the new information and communication technologies (such as high bandwidth Internet) and the rising cost of subscriptions to journals and secondary services are widening the gulf between the industrialized and developing countries. Ironically, the steep rise in the cost of S&T information has helped developing countries in a way, as it forced scientists and librarians in the advanced countries to think of measures to overcome the ‘serials crisis’ and many of these measures can benefit developing country scientists. This paper looks at doing research in the developing world and how we can harness the new technologies to achieve information equity.
KeywordsOpen Access Digital Library Advanced Country Open Access Journal Eprint Archive
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alberts, B. (1999). Science and the world’s future. President’s address to the Fellows of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, Washington D.C., 26 April 1999.Google Scholar
- Alberts, B. (2002). Engaging in a worldwide transformation: our responsibility as scientists for the provision of global public goods. President’s address to the Fellows of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, Washington D.C., 29 April 2002.Google Scholar
- Alberts, B. (2004). The InterAcademy Council: Inventing a new global organization. The Scientist, 18 (4) (1 March).Google Scholar
- Arunachalam, S. (1992). Periphery in science: What should be done to help peripheral science get assimilated into mainstream science? In R. Arvainitis, J. Gaillard (Eds.), Science Indicators for Developing Countries. Paris: Orstom.Google Scholar
- Arunachalam, S. (1996). Science on the periphery enriches mainstream science but at what cost? The case of ethnobotany. In R Waast (Ed.), Les Sciences Au Sud E’tat Des Lieux: Science in the south (Vol. 6, pp. 29–50). Paris: Orstom.Google Scholar
- Arunachalam, S. (2000). International collaboration in science: The case of India and China. In B. Cronin B, H.B. Atkins (Eds.), The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 215–231). Medford: Information Today Inc.Google Scholar
- Arunachalam, S. (2002a). Is science in India on the decline? Current Science, 83, 107–108.Google Scholar
- Arunachalam, S. (2004). India’s march towards open access. [http://www.scidev.net/Opinions/index.cfm?fuseaction=readOpinions&itemid=243&language=1].
- Arunachalam, S., Gunasekaran, S. (2001). Cardiovascular diseases research in India and China in the 1990s. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp.53–62). Sydney: University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
- Arunachalam, S., Gunasekaran, S. (2002a). Tuberculosis research in India and China: From bibliometrics to Research Policy, Current Science, 82, 933–947.Google Scholar
- Arunachalam, S. Gunasekaran, S. (2002b). Diabetes research in India and China today: from literature-based mapping to health-care policy. Current Science, 82, 1086–1097.Google Scholar
- Court, J., Young, J. (2003). Bridging Research and Policy: Insights from 50 case studies. ODI Working Paper 213. London: Overseas Development Institute. (available at www.odi.org.uk/publications).Google Scholar
- Dickson, D. (2003). The threat to science as a public good. 〈http://www.scidev.net/Editorials/index.cfm?fuseaction=readEditorials&itemid=55&language=1〉.
- European Commission. (1997). EUR 17639—Second European Report on S&T Indicators. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2003). EUR 20025—Third European Report on Science & Technology Indicators. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
- Fox, C.A. (2004). Scientific censorship. Chemical and Engineering News, 82 (9), 4–5.Google Scholar
- Frame, J.D., Narin, F., Carpenter, M.P. (1977). World distribution of science. Social Studies of Science, 7, 501–516.Google Scholar
- Global Forum for Health Research. (2000). The 10/90 Report on Health Research.Google Scholar
- Hattersley, A.T. (2002). Multiple facets of diabetes in young people. Current Science, 82, 273–278.Google Scholar
- Inter Academy Council. (2004). Inventing a better future: a strategy for building world capacities in science and technology. Amsterdam: IAC.Google Scholar
- National Science Board. (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators—2002. Arlington, Va.: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
- Salam, A. (1988). Notes on science, technology and science education in the development of the South (Prepared for the 4th Meeting on the South Commission, 10–12 December 1988, Kuwait). Trieste: The Third World of Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
- UNESCO (2001). The state of science and technology in the world, 1996–1997. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.Google Scholar
- United Nations Development Programme, 1997, Human Development Report 1997. Oxford University Press, New York. See Human Development Indicators, Table 15: Educational Imbalances, p. 81.Google Scholar