Advertisement

The Technological Output of Scientific Institutions

  • Ulrich Schmoch

Abstract

Up to now the contribution of scientific institutions to technology is considered to be primarily indirect. However, an analysis of patent applications of European public research institutions shows that they contribute about one half of all patent applications in selected science-based technology fields in the life sciences and nanotechnology. This finding documents a high direct contribution of science institutions to the generation of technology. The share of public non-profit institutions proves to be important, in particular in early stages of the technology life cycle; scientific institutions obviously play the role of lead actors. A comparison between European and German data reveals a lower, but still quite high share of public research institutes in other areas of science-based technology, so that the general statement of a high direct technology contribution holds. With regard to scientific institutions, patent indicators do not replace, but rather complement publication indicators and reflect an additional dimension of performance.

Keywords

Patent Application Science Citation Index European Patent Office International Patent Classification Public Research Institute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becher, G., Gering, T., Lang, O., Schmoch, U. (1996). Patentwesen an Hochschulen. Eine Studie zum Stellenwert gewerblicher Schutzrechte im Technologietransfer Hochschule— Wirtschaft. Bonn: BMBF.Google Scholar
  2. Böhme, G., van den Daele, W., Krohn, W. (1978). The’ scientification’ of Technology. In W. Krohn, E.T. Layton, P. Weingart (Eds.), The dynamics of science and technology (pp. 219–250). Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Freeman, C. (〈1974〉 1982). The economics of industrial innovation. 2nd edition. London: Frances Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Grupp, H., Schmoch, U. (1992a). Perceptions of scientification as measured by referencing between patents and papers. Dynamics in science-based fields of technology. In H. Grupp (Ed.), Dynamics of science-based innovation (pp. 73–130). Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Grupp, H., Schmoch, U., Hinze, S. (2001). International alignment and scientific regard as macro-indicators for international comparisons of publications. Scientometrics, 51 (2), 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Laredo, P. (1999). Changing structure, organisation and nature of public sector research. The development of a reproducible method for the characterisation of a large set of research collectives. A test on human genetics research in Europe. Armines: CSI.Google Scholar
  7. Meyer, M. (2003). Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness. Research Evaluation, 12, 12–27.Google Scholar
  8. Meyer-Krahmer, F., Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27, Special Issue (Ed. by R. Mayntz), 835–851.Google Scholar
  9. Narin, F., Noma, E. (1985). Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7 (3–6), 369–381.Google Scholar
  10. Noyons, E.C.M., Buter, R.K., van Raan, A.F.J., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., Hinze, S., Rangnow, R. (2003a). Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe. Life sciences. Leiden: CWTS.Google Scholar
  11. Noyons, E.C.M., Buter, R.K., van Raan, A.F.J., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., Hinze, S., Rangnow, R. (2003b). Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe. Nanoscience and nanotechnology. Leiden: CWTS.Google Scholar
  12. OECD (2003). Turning science into business. Patenting and licensing at Public Research Organisations. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  13. Pavitt, K. (1998). Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities? Research Evaluation, 7 (2), 105–111.Google Scholar
  14. Salter, J., Martin, B. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30, 509–532.Google Scholar
  15. Schmoch, U. (2000). Wissens-und Technologietransfer aus öffentlichen Einrichtungen im Spiegel von Patent-und Publikationsindikatoren. In U. Schmoch, G. Licht, M. Reinhard (Eds.), Wissens-und Technologietransfer in Deutschland (pp. 17–37). Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Schmoch, U. (2004). Der Beitrag öffentlicher Forschungseinrichtungen zur Technikgenese. Analyse im Rahmen der jährlichen Berichterstattung zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands. Accessible through “www.technologische-leistungs-faehigkeit.de”.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrich Schmoch
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation ResearchKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Institute of SociologyUniversity of KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations