Skip to main content

Abstract

Up to now the contribution of scientific institutions to technology is considered to be primarily indirect. However, an analysis of patent applications of European public research institutions shows that they contribute about one half of all patent applications in selected science-based technology fields in the life sciences and nanotechnology. This finding documents a high direct contribution of science institutions to the generation of technology. The share of public non-profit institutions proves to be important, in particular in early stages of the technology life cycle; scientific institutions obviously play the role of lead actors. A comparison between European and German data reveals a lower, but still quite high share of public research institutes in other areas of science-based technology, so that the general statement of a high direct technology contribution holds. With regard to scientific institutions, patent indicators do not replace, but rather complement publication indicators and reflect an additional dimension of performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becher, G., Gering, T., Lang, O., Schmoch, U. (1996). Patentwesen an Hochschulen. Eine Studie zum Stellenwert gewerblicher Schutzrechte im Technologietransfer Hochschule— Wirtschaft. Bonn: BMBF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, G., van den Daele, W., Krohn, W. (1978). The’ scientification’ of Technology. In W. Krohn, E.T. Layton, P. Weingart (Eds.), The dynamics of science and technology (pp. 219–250). Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (〈1974〉 1982). The economics of industrial innovation. 2nd edition. London: Frances Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H., Schmoch, U. (1992a). Perceptions of scientification as measured by referencing between patents and papers. Dynamics in science-based fields of technology. In H. Grupp (Ed.), Dynamics of science-based innovation (pp. 73–130). Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H., Schmoch, U., Hinze, S. (2001). International alignment and scientific regard as macro-indicators for international comparisons of publications. Scientometrics, 51 (2), 359–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laredo, P. (1999). Changing structure, organisation and nature of public sector research. The development of a reproducible method for the characterisation of a large set of research collectives. A test on human genetics research in Europe. Armines: CSI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2003). Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness. Research Evaluation, 12, 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Krahmer, F., Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27, Special Issue (Ed. by R. Mayntz), 835–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Noma, E. (1985). Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7 (3–6), 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyons, E.C.M., Buter, R.K., van Raan, A.F.J., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., Hinze, S., Rangnow, R. (2003a). Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe. Life sciences. Leiden: CWTS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyons, E.C.M., Buter, R.K., van Raan, A.F.J., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., Hinze, S., Rangnow, R. (2003b). Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe. Nanoscience and nanotechnology. Leiden: CWTS.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003). Turning science into business. Patenting and licensing at Public Research Organisations. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1998). Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities? Research Evaluation, 7 (2), 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, J., Martin, B. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30, 509–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch, U. (2000). Wissens-und Technologietransfer aus öffentlichen Einrichtungen im Spiegel von Patent-und Publikationsindikatoren. In U. Schmoch, G. Licht, M. Reinhard (Eds.), Wissens-und Technologietransfer in Deutschland (pp. 17–37). Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch, U. (2004). Der Beitrag öffentlicher Forschungseinrichtungen zur Technikgenese. Analyse im Rahmen der jährlichen Berichterstattung zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands. Accessible through “www.technologische-leistungs-faehigkeit.de”.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmoch, U. (2004). The Technological Output of Scientific Institutions. In: Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics