Advertisement

National Patterns of Technology Accumulation: Use of Patent Statistics

  • Lionel Nesta
  • Pari Patel

Abstract

We use US Patent Statistics to depict national patterns of technology accumulation in Japan and EU countries. Two properties of country profiles are confirmed, namely, stability over time with a country and differentiation across countries. The main novelty introduced here is the combined analysis of overall technological advantage, performance in fast growing areas and impact. The results show that in many areas of technology in which EU countries have an overall relative advantage, their performance in the subfields of highest technological opportunity is weak. On the other hand, Japan seems to have a consistent level of performance both in aggregate and in fast growing areas.

Keywords

Material Handling National System Patent Statistic Patent Data International Patent Classification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archibugi, D., Pianta M. (1992). The technological specialization of advanced countries, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  2. Arundel, A., van de Paal, G., Soete, L. (1995). Innovation strategies of europe’s largest industrial firms, PACE Report, MERIT, University of Limbourg, Maastricht.Google Scholar
  3. Bertin, G., Wyatt, S. (1988). Multinationals and industrial property, Harvester-Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
  4. Cantwell, J. (1992). The internationalisation of technological activity and its implications for competitiveness. In Granstand, O., Hakanson, L., Sjolander, S. (Eds.), Technology Management and International Business: Internationalisation of R&D and Technology. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter Publishers/Cassell Academic.Google Scholar
  6. Freeman, C. (1982). The economics of industrial innovation. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  7. Grupp H. (1992). Dynamics of science based innovation. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson R., Winter S. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, Washington.Google Scholar
  9. Lundvall, B-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  10. Narin, F., Olivastro D. (1992). Status report: linkage between technology and science, Research Policy, 21, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.). (1993). National systems of innovation: A comparative study, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Patel, P. (1998). Indicators for systems of innovation and system interactions: technological collaboration and inter-active learning, IDEA Paper Series, 11. Oslo: STEP Group, 20p.Google Scholar
  13. Pavitt, K. (1988). International patterns of technological accumulation. In N. Hood, J.-E. Vahlne (Eds.), Strategies in Global Competition. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  14. Samuelson, P. (1993). A case study on computer programs. In J. Wallerstein, M. Mogee, R. Schoen (Eds.), Global dimensions of intellectual property rights in Science and Technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  15. Schankerman, M., Pakes, A. (1986). Estimates of the value of patent rights in european countries during the Post-1950 Period, Economic Journal, 96, 1052–1076.Google Scholar
  16. Scherer, F. M. (1982). Inter-industry technology flows in the United States, Research Policy, 11, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard UP.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lionel Nesta
    • 1
  • Pari Patel
    • 1
  1. 1.SPRU, The Freeman CentreUniversity of SussexUK

Personalised recommendations