Advertisement

Evaluation of Research Performance and Scientometric Indicators in China

  • Bihui Jin
  • Ronald Rousseau
Chapter

Abstract

Chinese scientists and decision makers are, like their counterparts elsewhere in the world, highly interested in analysing the quality of their country’s academic and technological achievements. Twenty five years ago research activities Chinese scientists understood the world’s scientific research largely through journals consulted in libraries. in China were mainly conducted within the nation’s borders. Chinese scientists understood the world’s scientific research largely through journals consulted in libraries. They themselves published few papers in international journals. Meanwhile, the number of Chinese publications, as covered by SCI, has increased spectacularly: it rose from about 8,000 in the year 1990 to nearly 40,000 in the year 2002. What is the explanation for this extraordinary growth? The fundamentals of this accomplishment are to be found in the country’s major socio-economic development and the stimulating role of the government’s S&T policy. Although the number of Chinese publications covered by the Web of Science has rapidly increased, most Chinese research results are still published in domestic journals. This means that it makes little sense to use the Web of Knowledge as the only source for information retrieval, or for research evaluation purposes in China. For this reason it had already been decided in 1989 to develop local, i.e., Chinese, citation databases. This was the origin of the Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) and the China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations (CSTPC). In 1998 a Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI) was developed as well. Local databases of derived indicators, similar to the Journal Citation Reports, soon followed. The structure of these databases is described here. This contribution focuses on two parallel developments: one using ISI’s databases, aimed at gauging China’s international position; and one used for internal purposes, where the locally developed databases play an important role. Examples of comparisons and rankings based on local databases are given, and it is shown how these are different from rankings based on ISI’s databases. Chinese scientists and decision makers soon recognized that simple quantitative evaluations focussing on numbers stimulate the growth of publications, but have little effect on the quality of research. Hence new approaches and regulations for research evaluation are nowadays being introduced.

Keywords

Research Performance Research Evaluation Journal Citation Report Bibliometric Indicator Chinese Scientist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Association of Chinese Publishers (2002). China Publication Yearbook (p. 840). Beijing: China Publication Yearbook Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  2. Bonitz, M., Bruckner, E., Scharnhorst, A. (1999). The Matthew index — concentration patterns and Matthew core journals. Scientometrics, 44, 361–378.Google Scholar
  3. China Science & Technology Monthly (1998). The comprehensive indicators of the China science and technology development. China Science & Technology Monthly, 3, 20–23 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  4. Chinese Basic Science (2003). Decision on improvement in the works of sci-tech evaluation. Chinese Basic Science, 3, 4–6.Google Scholar
  5. Cyranoski, D. (2001). A great leap forward. Nature, 410, 10–12.Google Scholar
  6. Démurger, S. (2001). Infrastructure development and economic growth: an explanation for regional disparities in China? Journal of Comparative Economics, 29, 95–117.Google Scholar
  7. Group for Statistics and Analysis of Chinese Articles (2001). Chinese sci-tech paper and citation database (CSTPCD): selection standards and application process. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 12, 177–178 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  8. Jiang, Z. (2000). Science in China. Science, 288, 2317.Google Scholar
  9. Jin, B., Li, L., Rousseau, R. (2003). Production and productivity of Chinese scientists as a function of their age: the period 1995–1999. In G. Jiang, R. Rousseau, Y. Wu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 112–120). Dalian: Dalian Technological University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jin, B., Rousseau, R. (2001). An introduction to the barycentre method with an application to China’s mean centre of publication. Libri, 51, 225–233.Google Scholar
  11. Jin, B., Wang, B. (1999). Chinese Science Citation Database: its construction and applications. Scientometrics, 45, 325–332.Google Scholar
  12. Jin, B., Wang, S., Wang, B., Rousseau, R., Wu, Z., Liu, X., Zhu, X. (1999). A unified method of counting international and domestic articles. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2(3), 59–65. (In Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  13. Jin, B., Zhang, J., Chen, D., Zhu, X. (2002). Development of the Chinese Scientometric Indicators (CSI). Scientometrics, 54, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, J., Qian, G., Lam, K, Wang, D. (2000). Breaking into China. Strategic considerations for multinational corporations. Long Range Planning, 33, 673–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liang, L. (2003). Evaluating China’s research performance: how do SCI and Chinese indexes compare? Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 28, 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liang, L., Wu, Y., Li, J. (2001). Selection of databases, indicators and models for evaluating research performance of Chinese universities. Research Evaluation, 10, 105–113.Google Scholar
  17. Meng, G., Wang, B. (1996). The library and information system of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Libri, 46, 52–58.Google Scholar
  18. Moed, H.F. (2002). Measuring China’s research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 53, 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moed, H.F., Burger, W.J.M., Frankfort, J.G., Van Raan, A.F.J. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, 14, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. National Bureau of Statistics & Ministry of Science and Technology (2002). China Statistical Yearbook on Science and Technology (p.5). Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ren, S. (2002). Understanding and considerations of the SCI. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 13, 5–8 (in Chinese). Science, 286, 1683.Google Scholar
  22. Ren, S., Rousseau, R. (2002). International visibility of Chinese scientific journals. Scientometrics, 53, 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Russell, J., Rousseau, R. (2002). Bibliometrics and institutional evaluation. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Part 19.3 Science and Technology Policy (Arvantis, ed.). Oxford (UK): Eolss Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Science & Technology Ministry of the P.R. China (2003). The methods of S&T evaluation. Third edition, Nov. 6, 2003 (Document no.2003-308).Google Scholar
  25. Shang, Y. (1988). China’s scientific and technical standards as analysed from document statistics. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 7, 252–266 (in Chinese). Translated in English and published in G. Rui, P. Dale (Eds.), Information Science in China (pp. 66–95). London: Aslib (1991).Google Scholar
  26. Su, X. N., Han, X. M., Han, X. N. (2001). Developing the Chinese Social Science Citation index. Online Information Review, 25, 365–369.Google Scholar
  27. Sun, Y., Xu, K. (2002). Neither underestimate the role of SCI, nor misuse it. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 13, 1–4 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  28. Tsui, K. (1996). Economic reform and interprovincial inequalities in China. Journal of Development Economics, 50, 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang, D. (2001). Some opinions on the role of SCI in Research Evaluation. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 12, 292–294 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  30. Wang, Y., Wu, Y. (2001). Status and trend of scientific and technical collaboration between People’s Republic of China and Commonwealth of Australia: An analysis of scientific and technical papers co-authored by Chinese and Australians. In F. Havemann, R. Wagner-Döbler, H. Kretschmer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Berlin Workshop on Scientometrics and Informetrics: Collaboration in Science and in Technology (pp. 211–218). Berlin: Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  31. Wu Y. (2002). Some facts about using SCI to measure research performance. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 13, 39–41 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  32. Wu, Y., Liang L. (2001). Problems for attention and applying bibliographic quantitative indicators in evaluation of scientific research performance. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 12, 110–112 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  33. Wu, Y., Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Ma, Z., Pang, J., Guo, H., Xu, B., Yang, Z. (2003). China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations (CSTPC): history, impact and outlook. In G. Jiang, R. Rousseau, Y. Wu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 352–361). Dalian: Dalian Technological University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Yang, D.T. (1999). Urban-biased policies and rising income inequality in China. American Economic Review, 89, 306–310.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bihui Jin
    • 1
  • Ronald Rousseau
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Documentation and Information Centre of the Chinese Academy of SciencesChinese Science Citation DatabaseBeijingP.R. China
  2. 2.Antwerp UniversityWilrijkBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Industrial Science & TechnologyKHBOOostendeBelgium

Personalised recommendations