Abstract
A review of interdisciplinarity in science is presented from the point of view of quantitative studies of science. The main objectives pursued and methodologies used in publications on cross-disciplinary research are pointed out, as well as the most relevant results obtained. The study of cross-disciplinary collaboration between authors, co-classification analysis, interdisciplinary nature of publication journals and cross-disciplinary references and/or citations are the most useful approaches to the topic. Results about a global analysis of scientific areas and disciplines based on ISI multi-assignation indicators are presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bordons, M., Barrigón, S. (1992). Bibliometric analysis of publications of Spanish pharmacologists in the SCI (1984–89). II. Contribution to subfields other than ‘Pharmacology & Pharmacy’ (ISI). Scientometrics, 25, 425–446.
Bordons, M., Zulueta, M.A., Romero, F., Barrigón, S. (1999). Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a University: the effects of the Multidisciplinary Research Programme. Scientometrics, 46, 383–398.
Bourke, P., Butler, L. (1998). Institutions and the map of science: matching University departments and fields of research. Research Policy, 26, 711–718.
Braun, T., Schubert, A. (2003) A quantitative view on the coming of age of interdisciplinarity in the sciences 1980–1999. Scientometrics, 58, 183–189.
Cronin, B., Person, S. (1990). The export of ideas from information science. Journal of Information Science, 16, 381–391.
Franklin, M.N. (1988). The community of science in Europe. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., Czerwon, H.J. (1999). An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in multidisciplinary and general journals using reference analysis. Scientometrics, 44, 427–439.
Grigg, L. (1999). Cross-disciplinary research. A discussion paper. Commissioned Report No.61. Canberra: Australian Research Council.
Hargens, L.L. (1986). Migration patterns of U.S. Ph.D.s among disciplines and Specialties. Scientometrics, 9, 145–164.
Hinze, S. (1999). Collaboration and cross-disciplinarity in autoimmune diseases. Scientometrics, 46, 457–471.
Katz, S., Hicks, D. (1995). The classification of interdisciplinary journals: a new approach. In M.E.D. Koenig, A. Bookstein (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 245–254). Medford: Learned Information.
Klein, J.T. (1996). Interdisciplinary needs: the current context. Library Trends, 45, 134–154.
Le Pair, C. (1980). Switching between academic disciplines in universities in the Netherlands. Scientometrics, 2, 177–191.
McCain, K.W. (1995). The structure of biotechnology R&D. Scientometrics, 32, 153–175.
Metzger, N., Zare, R.N. (1999). Interdisciplinary research: from belief to reality. Science, 283, 642–643.
Morillo, F., Bordons, M., Gómez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51, 203–222.
Morillo, F., Bordons, M., Gómez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 1237–1249.
National Science Board (2000). Science and Engineering Indicators 2000. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, (NSB-00-1).
Narin, F., Carpenter, M., Berlt, N.C. (1972). Interrelationships of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23, 323–331.
Narin, F., Hamilton, K.S., Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26, 317–330.
Noma, E. (1986). Subject classification and influence weights for 3,000 journals. Report under Contract No. NIH-N01-OD-5-2118. New Jersey: CHI Research, Inc. (updated in 1999).
OECD (1998). Interdisciplinarity in Science and Technology. Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. Paris: OECD.
Pierce, S.J. (1999). Boundary crossing in research literatures as a measure of interdisciplinary information transfer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 271–279.
Porter, A.L., Chubin, D.E. (1985). An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics, 8, 161–176.
Qin, J., Lancaster, F.W., Allen, B. (1997). Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 893–916.
Qiu, L. (1992). A study of interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Evaluation, 2, 169–175.
Rinia, E.J., Van Leeuwen, T.N., Bruins, E.E.W., Van Vuren, H.G., Van Raan, A.F.J. (2002). Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics, 54, 347–362.
Sanz, L., Bordons, M., Zulueta, M.A. (2001). Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: its measure in three different research areas. Research Evaluation, 10, 47–58.
Schmoch, U., Breiner, S., Cuhls, K., Hinze, S., Münt, G. (1994). Interdisciplinary cooperation of research teams in science-intensive areas of technology. Final report to the Commission of the European Unit (VALUE II, Interface II, HS1). Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research.
Small, H. (1999). A passage through science: crossing disciplinary boundaries. Library Trends, 48, 72–108.
Small, H., Griffith, B.C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures. I. Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4, 17–40.
Song, C.H. (2003). Interdisciplinarity ad knowledge inflow/outflow structure among science and engineering research in Korea. Scientometrics, 58, 129–149.
Steele, T.W., Stier, J.C. (2000). The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: a forestry case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 476–484.
Tijssen, R.J.W. (1992). A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: co-classification analysis of energy research. Research Policy, 22, 27–44.
Tomov, D.T., Mutafov, H.G. (1996). Comparative indicators of interdisciplinary in modern science. Scientometrics, 37, 267–278.
Urata, H. (1990). Information flows among academic disciplines in Japan. Scientometrics, 18, 309–319.
Van der Besselaar, P., Heimeriks, G. (2001). Disciplinary, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary. Concepts and indicators. In M. Davis and C.S. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 705–716). Sydney: University of New South Wales.
Van Leeuwen, T., Tijssen, R. (2000). Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. Research Evaluation, 9, 183–187.
Weingart, P., Stehr, N. (Eds.). (1999). Practising interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bordons, M., Morillo, F., Gómez, I. (2004). Analysis of Cross-Disciplinary Research Through Bibliometric Tools. In: Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2702-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2755-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)