Advertisement

Patent Citations and the Economic Value of Patents

A Preliminary Assessment
  • Bhaven N. Sampat
  • Arvids A. Ziedonis

Abstract

Over the last decade, researchers studying innovation have increasingly used measures based on patent citations to estimate the values of new technologies, which are typically unobserved. In this study we examine the relationship between patent citation counts and private economic value in a dataset in which the latter is observed. Specifically, we use data about patenting and licensing by two major U.S. research universities to examine whether patent citations predict if university technologies are licensed, and the amount of revenue they earn if licensed. Our preliminary results suggest that citations are significantly related to the probability that a patent is licensed, but not to revenues conditional upon licensing.

Keywords

Citation Count Patent Citation NBER Working Paper Patented Invention Tobit Regression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Association of University Technology Managers 2000. Licensing Survey, FY 1999.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, David H. (1993). An event—study approach to measuring innovative output: the case of biotechnology. American Economic Review, 83, 253–258.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, David H. (1994). Patent citations and appropriability. Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  4. Buderi, Robert (1999). In search of innovation. Technology Review.Google Scholar
  5. Caballero, Ricardo J., Jaffe, Adam B. (1993). How high are the Giants’ shoulders: an empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. MIT and NBER; Harvard University and NBER.Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter, M., Narin, F., Woolf, P. (1981). Citation rates to technologically important patents. World Patent Information, 4, 160–163.Google Scholar
  7. Caudill, S., Jackson, J. (1989). Measuring marginal effects in limited dependent variable models. The Statistician, 38, 203–206.Google Scholar
  8. Cole, Jonathan R. (2000). A short history of the use of citations as a measure of the impact of scientific and scholarly work. In Blaise Cronin, Helen Atkins (Eds.), The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 281–300. Medford, N.J.: Information Today.Google Scholar
  9. Deng, Zhen, Lev Baruch, Narin, Francis (1999). Science & technology as predictors of Stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55.Google Scholar
  10. Directory of Corporate Affiliations, 1983–2000. Skokie, Ill.: National Register Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  11. Griliches, Zvi (1986). Economic data issues. In Zvi Griliches, Michael D. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (pp. 1466–1514). Volume 3. Handbooks in economics series, Book 2. Amsterdam, Oxford and Tokyo: North-HollandGoogle Scholar
  12. Griliches, Zvi (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.Google Scholar
  13. Griliches, Zvi (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, S29–47.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, Bronwyn H., Jaffe, Adam, Trajtenberg, Manuel (2000). Market value and patent citations: A first look. NBER Working Paper W7741.Google Scholar
  15. Harhoff, Dietmar, et al. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 511–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harhoff, Dietmer, Scherer, Frederic, Vopel, Katrin (1999). Citations, family size, and the value of patent rights. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  17. Henderson, Rebecca, Jaffe, Adam B., Trajtenberg, Manuel (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaffe, Adam (1998). Patents, patent citations, and the dynamics of technological change. NBER Reporter, 1998.Google Scholar
  19. Jaffe, Adam, Henderson, Rebecca, Trajtenberg, Manuel (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108.Google Scholar
  20. Jaffe, Adam, Trajtenberg, Manuel, Fogarty, Michael (2000). The meaning of patent citations: report on the NBER/Case-western reserve survey of patentees. NBER Working Paper W7631.Google Scholar
  21. Jaffe, Adam B., Fogarty, Michael S., Banks, Bruce A. (1998). Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 183–205.Google Scholar
  22. Jaffe, Adam B., Trajtenberg, Manuel (1999). International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 105–136.Google Scholar
  23. Jaffe, Adam B., Trajtenberg, Manuel (2000). Patents, citations & innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  24. Jensen, Richard, Thursby, Marie (1998). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The tale of university licensing. American Economic Review.Google Scholar
  25. Klepper, Steven, Leamer, Edward E. (1984). Consistent sets of estimates for regressions with errors in all variables. Econometrica, 52, 163–183.Google Scholar
  26. Krasker, William S., Pratt, John W. (1986). Bounding the effects of proxy variables on regression coefficients. Econometrica, 54, 641–655.Google Scholar
  27. Krugman, Paul (1991). Geography and Trade. Gaston Eyskens lecture series, Cambridge, Mass. and London.Google Scholar
  28. Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (1999). The quality of ideas: measuring innovation with multiple indicators. NBER Working Paper W7345.Google Scholar
  29. Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (2000). Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition. Draft Manuscript.Google Scholar
  30. Maddala, G.S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. McDonald, John F., Moffitt, Robert A. (1980). The uses of tobit analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 62, 318–321.Google Scholar
  32. Melkers, Julia. (1993). Bibliometrics as a tool for analysis of R&D impacts. In Barry Bozeman, Julia Melkers (Eds.), Evaluating R&D impacts: Methods and practice. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  33. Mogee, Mary Ellen, Kolar, Richard G., Putnam, Jonathan D. (1997). Patent indicators of global technology strategy. Reston, VA: Mogee Research & Analysis Associates.Google Scholar
  34. Mowery, David C., Sampat, Bhaven N. (2001). Patenting and licensing university inventions: lessons from the history of research corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change.Google Scholar
  35. Mowery, David C., Sampat, Bhaven N. (2001). University patents and patent policies: 1925–1980. Industrial and Corporate Change.Google Scholar
  36. Mowery, David C., Sampat, Bhaven N., Nelson, Richard R., Ziedonis, Arvids A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy, 30, 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Narin, F., Noma, E., Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Powell, James L. (1986). Censored regression quantiles. Journal of Econometrics, 32, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scherer, F.M., Harhoff, Dietmer (2000). Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes. Research Policy, 29, 559–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shane, Hilary, Klock, Mark (1997). The relation between patent citations and Tobin’s Q in the semiconductor industry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 9, 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trajtenberg, Manuel (1990). A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 172–187.Google Scholar
  42. Trajtenberg, Manuel, Henderson, Rebecca, Jaffe, Adam (1997). University versus corporate patents: a window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5, 19–50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bhaven N. Sampat
    • 1
  • Arvids A. Ziedonis
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Public PolicyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.University of Michigan Business SchoolAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations