Skip to main content

Upgrading Sewage Treatment Plants for Higher Performance by Optimising Reject Water Treatment

  • Conference paper
Book cover Enhancing Urban Environment by Environmental Upgrading and Restoration

Part of the book series: Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences ((NAIV,volume 43))

  • 908 Accesses

4. Conclusions

Separate treatment of the nitrogen rich reject water improves the COD/N ratio in the mainstream activated sludge process and consequently improves the efficiency of the biological nitrogen removal in sewage treatment plants.

The composition of the reject water is suitable for the use of new biological processes like nitritation/denitritation.

Primary sludge can be successfully used as the carbon source for the denitritation, which can be complete and controlled by the primary sludge / reject water ratio.

Treating the reject water with the extremely low CODsoluble/N-NH +4 ratio of 0.64, without an external carbon addition (considering the primary sludge as an internal source), at the volumetric loading rate up to 0.32 kgN/m3, the average nitrogen removal efficiency above 70% was achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6. References

  1. Novak L., Havrlikova D. (2003). Performance intensification of the Prague wastewater treatment plant. Proc. of 9th Conf. Design, Operation and Economics of Large Wastewater Treatment Plants, Prague 1–4 September 2003, 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes L.M. (2001). The use of high-rate nitrification for the pretreatment of ammoniacal digested sludge liquors. J.CIWEM, 14, 401–408.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Laurich F., Thierbach R. (2001). Sludge liquor management with Store and Treat. Proc. of 2nd IWA World Water Congress (CD-ROM), Berlin 15–19 October.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wett B. (2001). Stable N-elimination on the nitrate route in a full scale SBR for rejection water treatment. Proc. of 2nd IWA World Water Congress (CD-ROM), Berlin 15–19 October.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mulder, J.W., van de Graaf, A.A., Robertson, L.A., Kuenen, J.G. (1995). Anaerobic ammonium oxidation discovered in a denitrifying fluidized bed reactor. FEMS Microbiology Ecol., 16, 177–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hippen, A., Baumgarten, G., Rosenwinkel, K.H., Seyfried, C.F. (1994). Aerobic deammonification — a new experience in the treatment of wastewaters. Water. Sci. Tech., 35(10), 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abeling, U., Seyfried, C.F. (1992). Anaerobic-aerobic treatment of high strength ammonium wastewater — nitrogen removal via nitrite. Water Sci. Tech. 26(5–6), 1007–1015.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beier, M., Hippen, A., Seyfried, C.F., Rosenwinkel, K.H., Johansson, P. (1998). Comparison of different biological treatment methods for nitrogen-rich waste waters. European Water Management, 2,1, 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moser-Engler, R., Udert, K.M., Wild, D., Siegrist, H. (1998). Products from primary sludge fermentation and their suitability for nutrient removal. Water Sci. Tech., 38(1), 265–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong Chong, G.M., Loehr, R.C. (1978). Kinetics of microbial nitrification: nitrite-nitrogen oxidation. Water Res., 12, 605–609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ford D.L., Churchwell, R.L., Kachtick, J.W. (1980). Comprehensive analysis of nitrification of chemical processing wastewater. J.Water Pollut. Control Fed., 52(11), 2726–2746.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Anthonisen, A.C., Loehr, R.C., Prakasam, T.B.S., Srinatu, E.G. (1976). Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid. J.Water Pollut. Control Fed., 48, 835–852.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jenicek, P., Svehla, P., Zabranska, J., Dohanyos, M. (2003). Factors affecting nitrogen removal by nitritation/denitritation. Proc of Int. Symp. on Strong Nitrogenous and Agro-Wastewater, 85–92, Seoul 11–13 June 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jenicek, P. (2004). Upgrading Sewage Treatment Plants for Higher Performance by Optimising Reject Water Treatment. In: Marsalek, J., Sztruhar, D., Giulianelli, M., Urbonas, B. (eds) Enhancing Urban Environment by Environmental Upgrading and Restoration. Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2694-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics