Conclusion
Notch effects present some similar approaches in fatigue and fracture and are characterised in fracture by the critical gross stress being less than resulting only in a reduction of the cross section and in fatigue by the fact that the Wöhler curve obtained with a notched specimen being below that obtained with a smooth specimen.
In any case, the value of maximum stress or maximum stress range at the notch tip is able to describe this effect; experimental results show that the effective critical stress or effective stress range has a lower value than the maximum stress or stress range. To model this phenomenon two major approaches are possible: the hot spot approach, the volumetric approach.
The hot spot approach considers that the stress or the stress range value, for some particular point on the stress distribution, is equal to the effective stress or stress range.
The volumetric approach assumes that fatigue or fracture needs a physical process volume. Inside this volume at any point stress plays a role which depends upon its distance to the notch tip and the stress gradient. The hot spot approach is historically more traditional but cannot explain loading mode and scale effects in fatigue and fracture.
The effective stress or stress range being less than the maximum stress or stress range cannot be explained by plastic or damage relaxation but that a part of the stress distribution is acting on the process with an average value less than the maximum one. For the particular case of a notch as a crack the volumetric approach seems more appropriate owing to the assumption of a stress singularity in which the maximum stress or stress range is infinite. There is a continuous approach between notch fracture mechanics and classical fracture mechanics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Feddersen. C.E. (1970). ‘Evaluation and prediction of residual strength of center cracked tension panels’. ASTM STP 486, p 50.
Griffith. A.A. (1920). Phil Trans. Roy. Soc. London, A. 221, pp 163–198.
Neuber. H. (1958). ‘Kerbspannungslehre’ Springer: Berlin, “(in german).
Roark. R.J.(1989). ‘Roark’s Formulas for stress and strain’. 6th Edition MacGraw-Hill International Editions
Boukharouba. T, Tamine. T, Nui. L. Chehimi. C, Pluvinage G. (1995). ‘The use of notch stress intensity factor as a fatigue crack initiation parameter’. Engng. Fract. Mech, Vol Nº. 3, pp 503–512.
Peterson. R.E (1959). ‘Notch Sensitivity’. Metal Fatigue, (Edited by G. Sines & J.L. Waisman), MacGraw Hill, New-York
Hardrath. H.F. and Ohman. L. (1953). ‘A study of elastic and plastic stress concentration factors due to notches and cracks on flat plates’. NACA-Report 1117
Buch. A. (1974). ‘Analytical approach to size and notch size effects in fatigue of material specimens’. Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 15, pp 75–85.
Brandt A. (1980). ‘Calcul des pièces à la fatigue par la méthode du gradient’. Editeur CETIM.
Heywood. R.B. (1952). ‘Designing by photo-elasticity’, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2004). Notch Effects in Fracture and Fatigue. In: Fracture and Fatigue Emanating from Stress Concentrators. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2612-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2612-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1609-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2612-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive