Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 48))

  • 628 Accesses

Summary

Hydraulic roughness must either be inferred from some map of land use/cover or be remotely sensed. In either case, a surrogate measure or classification must be trsnformed into representative hydraulic parameters. It is rarely measured directly due to the difficulty of obtaining depth and velocity measurements in overland flow except on research-type runoff plots. Assigning hyudraulic roughness to general land use/cover classifications is difficult, because these classifications are rarely made according to hydrolic characteristics. The hydrologist must exercise some judgment in assigning hydraulic roughness parameters to these classification schemes. Further, the temporal natural of the coefficients and within-class variations are important sources of variance in predicted hydrolic response. While the values shown in the map may be used to simulate runoff in the overland flow areas of the basin, channel hydraulic roughness must be supplied from other sources. Field observation or experience is usually required to assign appropriate values of hydrulic roughness to channels. This may be said of the overland flow areas as well. In both cases, we can assign initial values and then adjust by calibration. The hydraulic roughness parameter maps are a key factor in controlling the velocity at which runoff travels through the drainage network and reaches the channel. This idea is addressed in subsequent chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allmaras, R. R., Burwell, R. E., and Holt, R. F., 1967, “Plow-layer porosity and surface roughness from tillage as affected by initial porosity and soil moisture at tillage time.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 31:550–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, V. T., 1959, Open Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Co., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebrook, C. F. and White, C. M., 1937, “Experiments with fluid friction in roughened pipes.” Proc., Royal Society of London, Series A, 161p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmett, W. W., 1970, The Hydraulics of Overland Flow on Hillslopes. U.S.Geological Survey Professional Paper No. 662-A U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englehund, F. and Hansen, E., 1967, A monograph on sediment transport in alluvial channels. Teknisk, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engman, E. T., 1986, “Roughness coefficients for routing surface runoff.” J. of Irrig. and Drain. Eng., 112(1):39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, J. E. and Finkner, S. C., 1991, “Hydraulic roughness coefficients as affected by random roughness.” Soil and Water Div. of ASA, 34(3):897–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins, L. F. and Monke, E. J., 1966, The mathematical simulation of the hydrology of small watersheds. Technical Report No. 1 Purdue University Water Resources Resesearch Center, West Lafayette, Indiana:130p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storm, D.E., G.J. Sabbagh, M.S. Gregory, M.D. Smolen, D. Toetz, D.R. Gade, C.T. Haan, T. Kornecki., 1996, Basin-wide Pollution Inventory for the Illinois River Comprehensive Basin Management Program. Final report submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Oklahoma Conservation Commission, Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Sillwater, Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieux, B. E., Bralts, V. F., Segerlind, L. J., and Wallace, R. B., 1990, “Finite Element Watershed Modeling: One Dimensional Elements.” J. Water Resources Planning and Management, 116(6), November/December pp.803–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieux, B. E. and Farajalla, N. S., 1994, “Capturing the essential spatial variabiltiy in distributed hydrological modeling: Hydraulic roughness.” J. Hydrol. Process., 8:221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobeck, T. M. and Onstad, C. A., 1987, “Tillage and rainfall effects on random roughness: A review.” Soil and Tillage Res., 1:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2004). Hydraulic Roughness. In: Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 48. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2460-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2460-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2459-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2460-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics