Abstract
It is widely accepted that the spatial pattern of settlements is a crucial factor affecting quality of life and environmental sustainability, but few recent studies have attempted to examine the phenomenon of sprawl by modelling the process rather than adopting a descriptive approach. The issue was partly addressed by models of land use and transportation which were mainly developed in the UK and US in the 1970s and 1980s, but the major advances were made in the area of modelling transportation, while very little was achieved in the area of spatial and temporal land use. Models of land use and transportation are well-established tools, based on explicit, exogenouslyformulated rules within a theoretical framework. The new approaches of artificial intelligence, and in particular, systems involving parallel processing, (Neural Networks, Cellular Automata and Multi-Agent Systems) defined by the expression “Neurocomputing”, allow problems to be approached in the reverse, bottom-up, direction by discovering rules, relationships and scenarios from a database. In this article we examine the hypothesis that territorial micro-transformations occur according to a local logic, i.e. according to use, accessibility, the presence of services and conditions of centrality, periphericity or isolation of each territorial “cell” relative to its surroundings. The prediction capabilities of different architectures of supervised Neural networks are implemented to the south Metropolitan area of Milan at two different temporal thresholds and discussed. Starting from data on land use in 1980 and 1994 and by subdividing the area into square cells on an orthogonal grid, the model produces a spatial and functional map of urbanisation in 2008. An implementation of the SOM (Self Organizing Map) processing to the Data Base allows the typologies of transformation to be identified, i.e. the classes of area which are transformed in the same way and which give rise to territorial morphologies; this is an interesting by-product of the approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Batty M., Y. Xie and Z. Sun, 1999, “Modelling urban dynamics in through GIS based Cellular automata”, Computers, Environment and urban Systems, 23, p. 205–234.
Bishop I., 1994, “Comparing regression and NN based approach to Modelling of scenic beauty”, WP of Center for GIS and Modelling, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Bolchi P., L. Diappi and L. Franzini, 2001, “Applicazione di una rete neurale al frame di un automa cellulare”, Proceedings of INPUT 2001, Isole Tremiti, June 27th–29th 2001.
Buscema M. (ed.), 1998, “Artificial Neural Networks and Complex Social Systems. I Theory, II Models, III Applications.”, Special Issue of Substance Use and Misuse, 33.
Diappi L., M. Buscema and M. Ottanà, 1998, “A neural network investigation on the crucial Assets of urban Sustainability”, Substance Use and Misuse Special Issue on Artificial Neural Networks and Social Systems, 33, p. 793–817.
Clarke K., S. Hoppen and I. Gaydos, 1997, “A self modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanisation in the San Francisco Bay Area”, Environment and Planning B, 24, p. 247–261.
Deadman P. and R. Gimblett, 1995, “Merging technologies: linking ANN to GIS for Landscape research and Education”, WP School of renewable natural resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Fischer M.M. and Y. Leung (eds.), 2001, Geocomputational Modelling, Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.
Hecht-Nielsen R., 1990, Neurocomputing, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Mass.
Hinton G.E. and J.L. McLelland, 1988, “Learning representation by recirculation”, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, November 1988.
Kohonen T., 1995, Self-Organising Maps, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Openshaw S. and R.J. Abrahart, 2000, Geocomputation, Taylor & Francis, London and New York.
Portugali J., I. Benenson and I. Omer, 1997 “Spatial cognitive dissonance and socio-spatial emergence in a self-organizing city”, Environment and Planning B, 24, p. 263–285.
Portugali J., I. Benenson and I. Omer, 1994, “Socio-spatial residential dynamics: stability and instability within a self-organizing city”, Geographical Analysis, 26, p. 321–340.
Reggiani A., 2000, Spatial economic science, Springer Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg.
Sui D.Z., 1992, “An initial investigation of integrating NN with GIS for spatial Decision Making”, Proceedings of GIS/LIS 92, San Jose, California
White R. and G. Engelen, 2000, “High resolution integrated modelling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems”, Computers, Environment and urban Systems, 24, p. 383–400.
Wu F., 1998, “An experiment on the generic polycentricity of urban growth in a cellular automatic city”, Environment and Planning B, 25, p. 731–752.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this paper
Cite this paper
Diappi, L., Bolchim, P., Buscema, M. (2004). Improved Understanding of Urban Sprawl Using Neural Networks. In: Van Leeuwen, J.P., Timmermans, H.J.P. (eds) Recent Advances in Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2409-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2409-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2408-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2409-2
eBook Packages: Architecture and DesignEngineering (R0)