Abstract
Remote sensing is one primary tool for studying the interactions of solar radiation with the atmosphere and surface and their influence on the Earth radiation balance. During the past three decades the radiation measured from satellite, aircraft and ground have been employed successfully for characterizing radiative properties of land, ocean, atmospheric gases, aerosols, clouds, etc. One of the challenges in implementing remote sensing is the development of a reliable inversion procedure required for deriving information about the atmospheric or surface component interaction with the measured radiation. The inversion is particularly crucial and demanding for interpreting high complexity measurements where many unknowns should be derived simultaneously. Therefore the deployment of remote-sensing sensors of the next generation with diverse observational capabilities inevitably would be coupled with significant investments into inverse-algorithm development. Numerous publications offer a wide diversity of inversion methodologies suggesting somewhat different inversion methods. Such uncertainty in methodological guidance leads to excessive dependence of inversion algorithms on the personalized input and preferences of the developer. This study is an attempt to outline unified principles addressing such important aspects of inversion optimization as accounting for errors in the data used, inverting multi-source data with different levels of accuracy, accounting for a priori and ancillary information, estimating retrieval errors, clarifying potential of employing different mathematical inverse operations (e.g. comparing iterative versus matrix inversion), accelerating iterative convergence, etc. The described concept uses the principles of statistical estimation and suggests a generalized multi-term least-square-type formulation that complementarily unites advantages of a variety of practical inversion approaches, such as Phillips-Tikhonov-Twomey constrained inversion, Kalman filters, Gauss-Newton and Levenberg-Marquardt iterations, etc. The proposed methodology has resulted from the multi-year efforts of developing inversion algorithms for retrieving comprehensive aerosol properties from ground-based remote sensing observations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
S. Twomey, “Introduction to the Mathematics of Inversion in Remote Sensing and Indirect Measurements”, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1977).
A.N. Tikhonov and V.Y. Arsenin, “Solution of Ill-Posed Problems” (Wiley, New York, 1977).
A. Tarantola, “Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation”, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987).
W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, B.P. Flannery, “Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN. The art of Scientific Computing”, (Cambridge University Press, 1992).
A. Bakushinsky and A. Goncharsky, “Ill-Posed Problems: Theory and Applications” (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994).
C.D. Rodgers, “Inverse methods for atmospheric sounding: theory and practice”, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000).
O.V. Dubovik, T.V. Lapyonok, and S.L. Oshchepkov, Appl. Opt., 34, 8422 (1995).
O. Dubovik, A. Smirnov, B. N. Holben, et al., J. Geophys. Res., 105, 9791 (2000).
O. Dubovik and M. D. King, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 20673 (2000).
R.E. Kalman, J. Basic. Engrg., 35, 82 (1960).
B.L. Phillips, J. Assoc. Comp. Mach, 9, 84 (1962).
A.N. Tikhonov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 151, 501 (1963).
S. Twomey, J. Assoc. Comp. Mach., 10, 97 (1963).
S. Twomey, J. Comp. Phys, 18, 188 (1975).
Strand, O. N., and E. R. Westwater, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 15, 100 (1968).
Strand, O. N., and E. R. Westwater, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 5, 287 (1968).
M.T. Chahine, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 12, 1634 (1968).
V.F. Turchin and V.Z. Nozik, Izv. Acad. Nauk SSSR Fiz. Atmos. Okeana, 5, 29 (1969).
C.D. Rodgers, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 14, 609 (1976).
B.N. Holben, T.F. Eck, I. Slutsker et al., Remote Sens. Envir., 66, 1 (1998).
M.D. King, M.G. Strange, P. Leone, et al., J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 3, 513 (1986).
D.J. Diner, J.C. Beckert, T.H. Reilly, et al., IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 36, 1072 (1998).
Y. Sasano, M. Suzuki, T. Yokota, et al., Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 197 (1999).
P. Goloub, D. Tanre, J.L. Deuze, et al., IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 37, 1586 (1999).
J. Chowdhary, B. Cairns, M. Mishchenko, et al., Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 243 (2001).
J. Chowdhary, B. Cairns, L.D. Travis, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 383 (2002).
W.T. Edie, D. Dryard, F.E. James, M. Roos, B. Sadoulet, “Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics”, (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1971)
C. R. Rao, “Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications” (Wiley, New York, 1965).
G. A. Serber, “Linear Regression Analysis”, (Wiley, New York, 1977).
A. Alpert, “Regression and the Moore-Penrose Pseudoiniverse” (Academic Press, New York, 1972).
A. N. Tikhonov, A. S. Leonov and A. G. Yagola, “Nonlinear Ill-Posed Problems”, (Chapman & Hall, London 1998).
V.F. Turchin, V.P. Kozlov and M.S. Malkevich, Sov. Phys. Usp. Fiz.-USSR, 13, 681 (1971).
A. Gelb, “Applied Optimal Estimation”, (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1988).
D. Hartely and R. Prinn, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 5183 (1993).
M.D. King, D. M. Byrne, B. M. Herman et al., J. Atmos. Sci., 21, 2153 (1978).
M.D. King, J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 1356 (1982).
T. Nakajima, G. Tonna, R. Rao, et al., Appl. Opt., 35, 2672 (1996).
D. Muller, U. Wandinger, A. Ansmann, Appl. Opt., 38, 2346 (1999).
O.P. Hasekamp and J. Landgraf, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 8077 (2001).
I. Veselovskii, A. Kolgotin, V. Griaznov et al., Appl. Opt., 41, 3685 (2002).
P.S. Hansen, Inverse Problems, 8, 849 (1992)
V.F. Turchin and L.S. Turovtse, Optika I Spectroskopiya, 36, 280 (1974)
A.M. Obuhov, Izv. Acad, Sci. SSSR Geophys., 432 (1960)
G., Forsythe, and W. Wasow, “Finite Difference Methods for Partial Differential Equations”, (Wiley, New York, 1960).
J.M. Ortega, “Introduction to Parallel and Vector Solution of Linear System”, (Plenum Press, New York, 1988).
V. Krasnopolsky, L.C. Breaker, and W.H. Gemmill, J. Geophys. Res, 100, 11,033 (1995).
D.E. Goldberg, “Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning”, (Addison-Wesley Pub., 1989)
B.R. Lienert, J.N. Porter, S.K. Sharma J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 20, 1403, (2003).
J.M. Ortega and W.C. Reinboldt, Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables, (Academic Press, New York, 1970).
S.L. Oshchepkov and O.V. Dubovik, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 26, 728 (1993).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dubovik, O. (2004). Optimization of Numerical Inversion in Photopolarimetric Remote Sensing. In: Videen, G., Yatskiv, Y., Mishchenko, M. (eds) Photopolarimetry in Remote Sensing. NATO Science Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry, vol 161. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2368-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2368-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2366-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2368-2
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)