Skip to main content

The Limits of Text in Greek Mathematics

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 238))

Abstract

This article argues for a limited role of the text in Greek mathematics, in two senses of “text”: the verbal as opposed to the visual; and the literate as opposed to the “oral” (understood in a wide sense). The Greek mathematical argument proceeds not within the confines of the verbal alone, but essentially relies upon diagrams. On the other hand, it does not use other specific techniques, such as those of the modern cross-reference, relying instead upon verbal echoes. The two, taken together, suggest a model of scientific writing radically different from what we associate with our own mathematics. In methodological terms, the article surveys its evidence in detail, and makes comments concerning the methodology of studying ancient texts through the evidence of those texts alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Heath, T.L. 1913. Aristarchus of Samos, the ancient Copernicus. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiberg, J.L. 1883. Euclidis Elementa, 5 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiberg, J.L. 1891–1893. Apollonii Pergaei quae Graece exstant cum commentariis antiquis. Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiberg, J.L. 1910–1915. Archimedis opera omnia cum commentariis Eutocii, 3 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogenet, J. 1950. Autolycus de Pitane: histoire du texte suivie de l’édition critique des traités De la sphère en mouvement et Des levers et couchers. Louvain: Bibliothèque de l’Université.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, G.R. 1970. Proclus / A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netz, R. 1999. The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: a Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taisbak, C.M. 2003. “Exceeding and Falling Short: Elliptical and Hyperbolical Application of Areas.” Science in Context 16: 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Netz, R. (2004). The Limits of Text in Greek Mathematics. In: Chemla, K. (eds) History of Science, History of Text. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 238. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2321-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics