Skip to main content

Patients, Society and Healthcare Professionals

  • Chapter
Book cover Textbook of Healthcare Ethics
  • 1619 Accesses

Summary

The practice of medicine is a social task in which patient and healer must respect each other’s personal morality and moral agency. The vastly greater power (real or perceived) of the health-care provider and specifically of the physician puts the burden of this fiduciary relationship largely (but not solely) on the shoulders of the health-care provider. While health-care providers cannot—and act ethically—impose their own personal morality on the patient neither can the patient ask physicians to violate their own personal morality. Physicians and other health-care providers cannot simply follow the dictates of their particular HMO, MCO or the rules promulgated by the government (and may, in fact, be faced with quite unpleasant choices) and blame “the system”. They carry a heavy responsibility in trying to resist dictates deemed harmful to their patient. Above all they carry not simply the responsibility of accommodating themselves or resisting a system someone else builds for them but of playing their proper part in building a system which is equitable to all members of the community and flexible enough to change as do circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Szasz TS, Hollender MH. The basic models of the doctor-patient relationship. Arch Intern Med. 1956;97:585–592.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pellegrino ED. Toward a reconstruction of medical morality: the primacy of the act of profession and the fact of illness. J Med Phil. 1979;4(1):32–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pellegrino ED. Thomasma DC. A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amundsen DW. The physician’s obligation to prolong life: a medical duty without classical roots. Hastings Center Report. 1978;8(4):23–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lifton R. The Nazi Doctors. New York, NY: Basic Books, New York, 1986; and Jones JJ. Bad Blood. New York, NY: Free Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Loewy EH. Friendship and medicine. Cambr Q Health Care Ethics. 1994;3(1): 52–59.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Szasz TS, Hollender MH. The basic models of the doctor-patient relationship. Arch Intern Med. 1956;97:585–592.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cassell E. The Healer’s Art: A New Approach to the Patient—Physician Relationship. Philadelphia, Pa: J.B. Lippincott, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cassell E. The function of medicine. Hastings Center Report. 1977;7(6):16–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Loewy EH. Clergy and physicians encounter medical ethics. Humane Med. 1987;3(1):48–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engelhardt HT. The disease of masturbation: values and the concept of disease. Bull Hist Med. 1974;48:234–248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization, 22 July 1946. Public Health Rep. 1946;61:1268–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dewey J. Logic, the Theory of Inquiry. New York, NY: Henry Holt, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parsons T. Definitions of health and illness in light of American values and social structure. In: Caplan A, Engelhardt HT, McCartney JJ, eds. Concepts of Health and Disease. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1981;57-82.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Glazer G. The “good” patient. Nurs Health Care. 1981;11(3):144–164.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bhanumathi PP. Nurses’ conception of the “sick-role” and “good-patient behaviour”: a cross-cultural comparison. Int Nurs Rev. 1977;24(1):20–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Payer L. Medicine and Culture. New York, NY: Henry Holt, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lain-Etralgo P, Partridge P, trans. Doctor and Patient. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Morison RS. The biological limits of autonomy. Hastings Center Report. 1984; 14(5):43–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ozar D. Patienťs autonomy: three models of professional-lay relationships in medicine. Theor Med. 1984;5:61–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pellegrino ED. Thomasma DC. For the Patienťs Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Healthcare. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Loewy RS. A critique of traditional relationship models. Cambr Q Health Care Ethics. 1994;3:27–37 and in Integrity and Personhood: Looking at Patients from a Bio/Psycho/Social Perspective. Kluwer/Plenum Publishers, 2000.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kottow MH. Medical confidentiality: an intransigent and absolute obligation. J Med Ethics. 1986;12:117–122.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Siegler M. Confidentiality in medicine: a decrepit concept. N Engl J Med. 1982;307(24):1518–1521.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thompson IE. The nature of confidentiality. J Med Ethics. 1982;8:12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jones JJ. Bad Blood. New York, NY: Free Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jonsen AR, Sagan L. Torture and the ethics of medicine, Man Med. 1978;3:33–49.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. World Medical Association. Declaration of Tokyo. Bull Am Coll Phys. 1976; 17(6):15.

    Google Scholar 

  30. United Nations General Assembly. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly. Principles of Medical Ethics. Geneva: CIOMS, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Loewy EH. Communities, self-causation and the natural lottery. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26:1133–1139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Loewy EH. Duties, fears and physicians. Soc Sci Med. 1986;22(12):1363–1366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shelp EE. Courage: a neglected virtue in the patient-physician relationship. Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(4):351–360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramsey P. The Patient as Person. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Drane JF. The many faces of competency. Hastings Center Report. 1985;15(2):7–21

    Google Scholar 

  36. Drane JF. Competency to give informed consent. JAMA. 1984;252:925–927.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Meisel A. Two models of implementing the idea of informed consent. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:1385–1389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cassell E. The function of medicine. Hastings Center Report. 1977;7(6):16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Winau R. Das Krankenhaus Moabit. Berlin: Hentrich Verlag, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Alexander L. Medical science under a dictatorship. N Engl J Med. 1949;241:39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mitscherlisch A. Medizin ohne Menschlickeit: Dokumente des Nürnberger Ärzte-prozesses. Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Thomasma DC. Applying general medical knowledge to individuals: a philosophical analysis. Theor Med. 1989;9:187–2000.

    Google Scholar 

  43. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Report and Recommendations: Research Involving Children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  44. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Report and Recommendations: Research Involving Prisoners. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  45. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Report and Recommendations: Research Involving Those Institutionalized as Mentally Infirm. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Murray TH. Divided loyalties for physicians: social context and moral problems. Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(8):827–832.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Engelhardt HT. The Foundations of Bioethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Loewy EH. Freedom and Community: The Ethics of Interdependence. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  49. World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization, 22 July 1946. JAMA. 1946;131(17):1431–1434.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Edelstein L. Antike Diätetik. Antike. 1931;7:255–270.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Garrison FH. Life as an occupational disease. Bull NY Acad Med. 1933;10:679–693.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Terris M. Concepts of social medicine. Soc Serv Rev. 1957;31:164–178.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lowinger P. The doctor as political activist. Am J Psychother. 1968;22:616–625.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Jonsen AR, Jameton AL. Social and political responsibilities of physicians. J Med Phil. 1977;2(4):376–400.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Childress JF. Citizen and physician: harmonious or conflicting responsibilities. J Med Phil. 1977;2(4):401–409.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Jonas H. Technology and responsibility. In: Jonas H, ed. Philosophical Essays. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1974;3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Braithwaite SS. Collective Action by physicians that do not endanger patiemts. Cambridge Q. Health Care Ethics 2000 9(4):460–469

    Google Scholar 

  58. Loewy H. Of Health Care Professionals, Ethics and Strikes. Cambridge Q. Health Care Ethics 2000 9(4):513–520.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2005). Patients, Society and Healthcare Professionals. In: Textbook of Healthcare Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2252-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2252-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1460-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2252-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics