Skip to main content

Comparison of Risks from Use of Traditional and Recycled Road Construction Materials: Accounting for Variability in Contaminant Release Estimates

  • Conference paper
Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making

Part of the book series: Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences ((NAIV,volume 38))

  • 1440 Accesses

Abstract

Recycled materials, such as recovered materials from the transportation sector or secondary or by-product materials from the industrial, municipal, or mining sectors can be used as substitutes for natural materials in the construction of highway infrastructure. Trace metals in these recycled materials may leach out and contaminate the groundwater and soil posing a long-term environmental problem. Environmental risk assessments are necessary to evaluate which recycled material applications are acceptable. The first step for determining the environmental risk of using recycled materials is to characterize the source term. Estimates of contaminant release fluxes can then be used in a comparative risk assessment. This paper will give an example of a comparative, probabilistic approach for exposure assessment. Existing deterministic models for estimating contaminant release will be presented and incorporation of variability in these models will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Federal Highway Administration (1999) http://wwwcf.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/hs99/tables/hm10.pdf

  2. Eighmy, T.T. and Magee, B.J. (2001) The road to reuse, Civil Engineering, 66–81

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shimmoller, V., Holtz, K., Eighmy, T., Wiles, C., Smith, M., Malasheskie, G., and Rohrbach, G.J. (2000) Recycled materials in European highway environments: Uses, technologies, and policies, American Trade Initiatives

    Google Scholar 

  4. ASTSWMO (2000) ASTSWMO Beneficial Use Survey Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kosson, D.S., van der Sloot, H.A., Sanchez, F., Garrabrants, A.C. (2002) An integrated framework for evaluating leaching in waste management and utilization of secondary materials, Environmental Engineering Science, 19(3), 159–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kosson, D.S., van der Sloot, H., and Eighmy, T.T. (1996) An approach for estimation of contaminant release during utilization and disposal of municipal waste combustion residues, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 47, 43–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. NEN 7341 Leaching characteristics of building and solid waste materials — Leaching tests — Determination of inorganic components for leaching (Availability test), Netherlands Standardization Institute (NNI), Delft, Draft June 1992

    Google Scholar 

  8. NEN 7345 Leaching characteristics of soil, construction materials and wastes — Leaching tests — Determination of the release of inorganic constituents from construction materials, monolithic wastes and stabilized wastes, Netherlands Standardization Institute (NNI), Delft, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van der Sloot, H.A., Hoede, D., and Bonouvrie, P (1991) Comparison of different regulatory leaching test procedures for waste materials and construction materials, ECN-C-91-082, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, Petten, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van der Sloot, H.A., Hoede, D., de Groot, G.J., van der Wegen, G.J.L., and Quevauviller, P., (1994) Intercomparison of leaching tests for stabilized waste, ECN-C-94-062, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, Petten, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Groot, G.J., van der Sloot, H.A., Bonouvrie, P., and Wijkstra, J. (1990) Karakterisering van het uitlooggedrag van intacte produkten, ECN-C-90-007, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, Petten, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baldwin L, McCreary H., (1998) Study of State Soil Arsenic Regulations, Conducted by the Association for the Environmental Health of Soils

    Google Scholar 

  13. Apul, D., Gardner, K., and Eighmy, T., A review of water movement in the highway environment: Implications for recycled materials use, submitted for the proceedings of the Beneficial Use of Recycled Materials in Transportation Applications conference, November 2001, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this paper

Cite this paper

Apul, D.S., Gardner, K.H., Eighmy, T.T. (2004). Comparison of Risks from Use of Traditional and Recycled Road Construction Materials: Accounting for Variability in Contaminant Release Estimates. In: Linkov, I., Ramadan, A.B. (eds) Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making. Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2243-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics