Abstract
A formulation for the value of information for conflict resolution is shown to provide insights and guidance for identifying the attributes of scientific procedures and studies needed to support participatoryrisk assessment and decision making. Traditional approaches to the value of information are first reviewed, including the determination of potential reductions in the uncertainty variance of risk-model outputs resulting from a proposed study or data collection program, and the economic value of information in a decision-analytic context. Limitations of these metrics are identified — when scientific assessments are conducted by multiple experts who may be exposed to either consistent or inconsistent observations, and when decision value is required for multiple stakeholders who may differ in their prior beliefs, methods for interpreting scientific studies, and their economic valuations for the outcomes of alternative decisions. Methods for identifying the sources and implications of differences in these among experts and stakeholders are presented. The use of a precautionary ratio is proposed as a means for characterizing the source of differing degrees of precaution exhibited towards a proposed project by different rational stakeholders, highlighting the programmatic and scientific changes that could be considered by project proponents to attempt to build a consensus with other, more-precautionary parties. Initial methods for computing a monetary value of information for conflict resolution are also presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abbaspour, K. C., R. Schulin, R., E. Schlappi and H. Fluhler, (1996) A Bayesian approach for incorporating uncertainty and data worth in environmental projects. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 1: 151–158.
Alhakami, A.S. and Slovic, P. (1994) A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit, Risk Analysis 14, 1085–1096.
Bergin, M. S. and J. B. Milford, J. B., (2000) Application of Bayesian Monte Carlo analysis to a Lagrangian photochemical air quality model. Atmospheric Environment, 34(5): 781–792.
Bogen, K.T. and R.C. Spear, (1987) Integrating uncertainty and interindividual variability in environmental risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 7: 427–436.
Brand, K.P. and Small, M.J. (1995) Updating uncertainty in an integrated risk assessment: Conceptual framework and methods. Risk Analysis, 15(6): 719–731.
Casman, E.A., Morgan, M.G. and Dowlatabadi, H. (1999) Mixed levels of uncertainty in complex policy models, Risk Analysis 19, 33–42.
Chao, P.T., Hobbs, B.F. (1997) Decision analysis of shoreline protection under climate change uncertainty, Water Resources Research, 33(4): 817–830.
Clemen, R.T. (1996) Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis (2nd ed.), Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
Cleveland, T. and Yeh, W. W.-G. (1990) Sampling network design for transport parameter identification, Journal Water Resources Planning & Management, 116(6): 765–783.
Cleveland, T. and Yeh, W. W.-G. (1991) Optimal configuration and scheduling of groundwater tracer test, Journal Water Resources Planning & Management, 117(1): 37–51.
Cooke, R.M. (1991) Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science, Oxford Press, New York.
Costello, C.J., Adams, R.M., Polasky, S. (1998) The value of El Nino forecasts in the management of salmon: A stochastic dynamic assessment, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80: 765–777.
Cullen, A.C. and Frey, H.C. (1999) Probabilistic Techniques in Exposure Assessment — A Handbook for Dealing with Variability and Uncertainty in Models and Inputs. Plenum Press, New York.
Cvetkovich, G., Siegrist, M., Murray, R. and Tragresser, S. (2002) New information and social trust: Asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers, Risk Analysis, 22: 359–367.
Dakins, M.E., Toll, J.E. and Small, M.J. (1994) Risk-based environmental remediation: decision framework and role of uncertainty, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 13, 1907–1915.
Dakins, M.E., Toll, J.E., Small, M.J. and Brand, K.P. (1996) Risk-based environmental remediation: Bayesian Monte Carlo analysis and the expected value of sample information, Risk Analysis 16, 67–79.
DeGroot, M. H., M. J. Schervish (2002) Probability and Statistics. Addison-Wesley, Boston.
DeKay, M.L., M. J. Small, P.S. Fischbeck, R.S. Farrow, A. Cullen, J.B. Kadane, L. Lave, M.G. Morgan and K. Takemura. (2002) Risk-based decision analysis in support of precautionary policies. Journal of Risk Research, 5(4): 391–417.
Dilks, D.W., Canale, R.P., and Meier, P.G. (1992) Development of Bayesian Monte Carlo techniques for water quality model uncertainty. Ecological Modelling, 62:149–162.
Finkel, A.M. and Evans, J.S. (1987) Evaluating the benefits of uncertainty reduction in environmental health risk management, Journal Air Pollution Control Association, 37:1164–1171.
Forester, J. and Stitzel, D. (1989) Beyond neutrality: The possibilities of activist mediation in public sector conflicts, Negotiation Journal, 5(3): 251–264.
Freeze, R.A., Massmann, J.W., Smith, L., Sperling, T. and James, B. (1990) Hydrogeological decision analysis, 1. A framework, Ground Water, 28, 738–766.
Frey, H.C. and Burmaster, D.E. (1999) Methods for characterizing variability and uncertainty: Comparison of bootstrap simulation and likelihood-based approaches. Risk Analysis, 19(1): 109–130.
Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. (1991) Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Gamerman, D. (1997) Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference. Chapman & Hall, New York.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S. and Rubin, D.B. (1995) Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall, London.
Gregory, R., Kunreuther, H, Easterling, D. and Richards, K. (1991) Incentives policies to site hazardous facilities. Risk Analysis, 11: 667–675.
Gurian, P.L, Small, M.J., Lockwood, J.R.III and Schervish, M.J. (2001) Benefit-cost estimation for alternative drinking water maximum contaminant levels. Water Resources Research, 37(9): 2213–2226.
Hammitt, J.K. and Shlyakhter, A.I. (1999) The expected value of information and the probability of surprise, Risk Analysis 19, 135–152.
Hilton, R.W. (1981) The determinants of information value: Synthesizing some general results, Management Science, 27: 57–64.
Hoffman, F.O., Hammonds, J.S. (1994) Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability, Risk Analysis, 14, 707–712.
Iman, R. and Hora, S. (1989) Bayesian methods for modeling recovery times with an application to the loss of off-site power at nuclear power plants. Risk Analysis, 9(1): 25–36.
James, B.R. and Gorelick, S.M. (1994) When enough is enough: The worth of monitoring data in aquifer remediation design, Water Resources Research, 30(12): 3499–3513.
Jasanoff, S. (1993) Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis, Risk Analysis 13, 123–129.
Johnson, B.B. and Slovic. P. (1995) Presenting uncertainty in health risk assessment: initial studies of its effects on risk perception and trust, Risk Analysis 15, 485–494.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A., eds. (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U K.
Johnson, N.L. and Kotz, S. (1970) Distributions in Statistics, Continuous Univariate Distributions-1. Wiley, New York.
Keeney, R.L. (1982) Decision analysis: an overview, Operations Research 39, 803–838.
Keller, L.R. and Sarin, R.K. (1995) Fair processes for societal decisions involving distributional inequalities, Risk Analysis 15, 49–59.
Kottegoda, NT. and R. Rosso. (1997) Statistics, Probability, and Reliability for Civil and Environmental Engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Kunreuther, H. and Easterling, D. (1996) The role of compensation in siting hazardous facilities, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15: 601–622.
Lee, P.M. (1989) Bayesian Statistics: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Leonard, T. and J.S.J. Hsu. (1999) Bayesian Methods, An Analysis for Statisticians and Interdisciplinary Researchers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Loaiciga, H.A. (1989) An optimizationapproach for groundwater quality monitoring design, Water Resources Research, 25(8): 1771–1782.
Lockwood, J.R., Schervish, M.J. Gurian, P. and Small, M.J. (2001) Characterization of arsenic occurrence in source waters of US community water systems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96(456): 1184–1193.
Massmann, J. and Freeze, R.A. (1987a) Groundwater contamination from waste management: the interaction between risk-based engineering design and regulatory policy, 1. Methodology, Water Resources Research 23, 351–367.
Massmann, J. and Freeze, R.A. (1987b) Groundwater contamination from waste management: the interaction between risk-based engineering design and regulatory policy, 2. Results, Water Resources Research 23, 368–380.
McKinney, D.C. and Loucks, D.P. (1992) Network design for predicting groundwater contamination, Water Resources Research, 28(1): 133–147.
Miller, D.S., Green, J.J. and Gill, D.A. (1999) Bridging the gap between the reductionist perspective of public policy and the precautionary perspective of communities, Electronic Green Journal, Issue 11, http://egj.lib.uidaho.edu/egj11/miller1.html, accessed April 3, 2003.
Monahan, J.F. (2001) Numerical Methods of Statistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Morgan, M.G., Henrion, M. (1990) Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Morgan, M.G. and Keith, D. (1995) Subjective judgments by climate experts, Environmental Science & Technology, 29(10): 468–476.
NRC (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, Stern, P.C. and Fineberg, H.V. (eds) National Research Council (NRC), Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
Patwardhan, A., Small, M.J., (1992) Bayesian methods for model uncertainty analysis with application to future sea level rise, Risk Analysis, 4, 513–523.
Raiffa, H. (1968) Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choice under Uncertainty, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Reichard, E.G. and Evans, J.S. (1989) Assessing the value of hydrogeologic information for risk-based remedial action decisions. Water Resources Research, 25(7): 1451–1460.
Reichert, P., Schervish, M. and Small, M.J. 2002. An efficient sampling technique for Bayesian inference with computationally demanding models. Technometrics, 44(4): 318–327.
Shlyakhter, A.I. (1994) Improved framework for uncertainty analysis: Accounting for unsuspected errors, Risk Analysis, 14: 441–447.
Slovic, P. (1993) Perceived risk, trust, and democracy, Risk Analysis, 13: 675–682.
Small, M.J. (1994) Invariably uncertain about variability? Try the normal-gamma conjugate! Proceedings of Air & Waste Management Association 87th Annual Meeting & Exhibition, June 19–24f, Cincinnati, Ohio, Paper 94-TP55.05.
Small, M.J. 1997. Groundwater detection monitoring using combined information from multiple constituents. Water Resources Research, 33(5): 957–969.
Small, M.J. and Fischbeck, P.S. (1999) False precision in Bayesian updating with incomplete models, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 5, 291–304.
Smith, H.J. and Kunreuther, H. (2001) Mitigation and benefits measures as policy tools for siting potentially hazardous facilities: Determinants of effectiveness and appropriateness, Risk Analysis, 21: 371–382.
Smith, J.Q. and French, S. (1993) Bayesian updating of atmosphericdispersion models for use after an accidental release of radiation. The Statistician, 42: 501–511.
Sohn, M.D., Small, M.J. and Pantazidou, M. (2000) Reducing uncertainty in groundwater site characterization using Bayes Monte Carlo methods. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 126(10): 893–902.
Stiber, N.A., Pantazidou, M. and Small, M.J. (1999) Expert system methodology for evaluating reductive dechlorination at TCE sites. Environmental Science & Technology, 33(17): 3012–3020.
Susskind, L. and Weinstein, A. (1980) Towards a theory of environmental dispute resolution, Boston College Law Review, 9: 311–357.
Susskind, L, Levy, P.F. and Thomas-Larmer, J. (2000) Negotiating Environmental Agreements, How to Avoid Escalating Confrontation, Needless Costs, and Unnecessary Litigation, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Taylor, A.C., Evans, J. and McKone, T. (1993) The value of animal test information in environmental control decisions, Risk Analysis, 13:403–412.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1971) Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 2: 105–110.
Wagner, B.J. (1995) Sampling design methods for groundwater modeling under uncertainty, Water Resources Research, 31(10): 2581–2591.
Wagner, B.J. (1999) Evaluating data worth for ground-water management under uncertainty, Journal Water Resources Planning & Management, 125(5): 281–288.
Winkler, R.L. and Murphy, A.H. (1985) Decision analysis, in A.H. Murphy and R.W. Katz (eds), Probability, Statistics, and Decision Making in the Atmospheric Sciences, pp. 493–524, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Wood, E. and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1975) A Bayesian approach to analyzing uncertainty among flood frequency models. Water Resources Research, 11(6): 839–843.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this paper
Cite this paper
Small, M.J. (2004). The Value of Information for Conflict Resolution. In: Linkov, I., Ramadan, A.B. (eds) Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making. Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2243-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2243-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1895-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2243-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)