Conclusion
It is often said that recent technological developments have radically changed the face of reproductive ethics and left a philosophical void in need of filling. However, I believe that this is an overstatement. The path I have traced in the text above, from issues of personhood and killing, to issues of technical production of children, to issues of autonomy and the relationship between sexual intercourse and children, is a path which has, I believe, been followed before. In his Republic, Plato deals with precursor issues to all these problems. We may think, first, of his provisions for infanticide, second, of the eugenic streak which runs through his discussion of the generation of children, and third, of the lack of reproductive and marital autonomy granted to the guardians by the state. While one might certainly disagree with Plato’s views on these matters, it is still the case that he began a tradition of philosophizing about such issues, a tradition which was advanced, often in regards to the same issues, by Aristotle, Augustine, Aquinas, Kant, and others. Those working in the field of reproductive ethics must certainly look forward, and I hope I have indicated some topics that require further investigation. But I believe we should also look back, and not forget, in the vertigo induced by the new reproductive technologies, the stability of over two thousand years of philosophical discussion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, W.F.: 1989, ‘Human Gene Therapy: Why Draw a Line?’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14, 681–93.
Anderson, W.F.: 1994, ‘Human Gene Therapy: Scientific and Ethical Considerations,’ 24, 275–291.
Atwood, M.: 1986, The Handmaid’s Tale, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J.: 1994, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Fourth Edition, Oxford University Press, New York.
Bedate, C.A. and Cefalo, R.C.: 1989, ‘The Zygote: To Be or Not to Be a Person,’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14, 641–45.
Benn, S.I.: 1984, ‘Abortion, Infanticide, and Respect for Persons,’ in Feinberg, J. (Ed.), The Problem of Abortion Second Edition, Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont.
Boonin-Vail, D.: 1997, ‘A Defense of “A Defense of Abortion”: On the Responsibility Objection to Thomson’s Argument,’ Ethics 107B, 286–313.
Boyle, J.: 1980, ‘Toward Understanding the Principle of Double Effect,’ Ethics 90, 527–38.
Boyle, J.: 1991, ‘Who is Entitled to Double Effect?’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16, 475–94.
Buchanan, A.: 1995, ‘Equal Opportunity and Genetic Intervention,’ Social Philosophy and Policy 12, 105–35.
Buchanan, A.: 1996, ‘Choosing Who Will Be Disabled: Genetic Intervention and the Morality of Inclusion,’ Social Philosophy and Policy 13, 18–46.
Buchanan, A., Daniels, D., Wilker, D., and Brock, D.W.: 2000, From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Clarke, S. and Simpson, E. (eds.): 1989, Anti-Theory in Ethics and Moral Conservatism, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Clouser, K. and Gert. B.: 1990, ‘A Critique of Principlism,’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15, 219–36.
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: 1987, Donum Vitae, Origins 16, 697–711.
Donagan, A.: 1977a, The Theory of Morality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Donagan, A.: 1977b, ‘Informed Consent in Therapy and Experimentation,’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2, 307–29.
Edwards, M. and Waldorf, M.: 1984, Reclaiming Birth, The Crossing Press, Trumansburg, NY.
Elliot, R.: 1997, ‘Genetic Therapy, Person-Regarding Reasons and the Determination of Identity,’ Bioethics 11, 151–69.
Engelhardt, H.T.: 1996a, Foundations of Bioethics, Second Edition, Oxford University Press, New York
Engelhardt, H.T.: 1996b, ‘Germ-Line Genetic Engineering and Moral Diversity: Moral Controversies in a Post-Christian World,’ Social Philosophy and Policy 13, 47–62.
English, J.: 1975, ‘Abortion and the Concept of a Person,’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5, 233–43.
Finnis, J.: 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Finnis, J.: 1991, Moral Absolutes: Tradition, Revision, and Truth, The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C.
Fletcher, J.: 1966, Situation Ethics, The Westminster Press, Philadelphia.
Fletcher, J.: 1994, ‘Ethical Issues in and Beyond Prospective Clinical Trials of Human Gene Therapy, The Hastings Center Report 24, 293–309
Foot, P.: 1967, ‘The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect,’ Oxford Review 5, 5–15; reprinted in Foot, P.: 1978, Virtues and Vices, and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Ford, N.: 1988, When Did I Begin? Conception of the Human Individual in History, Philosophy, and Science, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Gardner, W.: 1995, ‘Can Human Genetic Enhancement be Prohibited?’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20, 65–84.
Geach, P.: 1956, ‘Good and Evil,’ Analysis 17, 33–42.
George, R.: 1993, Making Men Moral, Oxford University Press, New York.
Gilligan, C.: 1982, In A Different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Grisez, G., Boyle, J. and Finnis, J.: 1987, ‘Practical Principles, Moral Truth, and Ultimate Ends,’ The American Journal of Jurisprudence 32, 99–151.
Grisez, G., Boyle, J., Finnis, J., and May, W.: 1988, ‘“Every Marital Act Ought To Be Open To New Life”: Toward a Clearer Understanding,’ The Thomist, 52, 365–426.
Grisez, G.: 1990, ‘When Do People Begin?’ Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 63, 27–47.
Grisez, G.: 1970, Abortion: The Myths, The Realities, and the Arguments, Corpus Books, New York.
Grisez, G.: 1978, ‘Against Consequentialism,’ American Journal of Jurisprudence 23, 21–72.
Grisez, G.: 1993, The Way of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Vol. II, Franciscan Press, Chicago.
Harris, J.: 1997, ‘Goodbye Dolly? The Ethics of Human Cloning,’ The Journal of Medical Ethics 23, 353–360.
Harris, J.: 1998, Clones, Genes, and Immortality: Ethics and the Genetic Revolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Howsepian, A.A.: 1992, ‘Who Or What Are We?,’ Review of Metaphysics 45, 483–502.
Hursthouse, R.: 1988, Beginning Lives, Oxford University Press.
Johnson, M.: 1995, ‘Questio Disputatia — Delayed Hominization: Reflections on Some Recent Catholic Claims for Delayed Hominization,’ Theological Studies, 56, 743–63.
Jones, D. and Tefler, B.: 1995, ‘Before I Was and Embryo, I Was a Pre-Embryo: Or Was I?’ Bioethics 9, 32–49.
Juengst, E.: 1997, ‘Can Enhancement be Distinguished from Prevention in Genetic Medicine?’ The Medicine and Journal of Philosophy 22, 125–42.
Kamm, F.: 1992, Creation and Abortion: A Study in Moral and Legal Philosophy, Oxford University Press, New York.
Kant, I.: 1959, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals Lewis White Beck, trans., Indianapolis, Library of the Liberal Arts, Indianapolis.
Kass, L.: 1997, ‘Cloning of Human Beings,’ Testimony presented to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, March 14, 1997, http://www.all.org/abac/clon sec.htm, 1–3
Khushf, G.: 1997, ‘Embryo Research: The Ethical Geography of the Debate,’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22, 495–519.
Kischer, C.: 1997, ‘The Big lie in Human Embryology: The Case of the Preembryo,’ Linacre Quarterly 64, 53–61.
Kitcher, P.: 1994, ‘Who’s Afraid of the Human Genome Project,’ Philosophy of Science Association 2, 313–21.
Krimmel, H.: 1992, ‘Surrogate Mother Arrangements From the Perspective of the Child,’ in Alpern, K., ed., The Ethics of Reproductive Technology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 57–70.
Lee, P.: 1996, Abortion and Unborn Human Life, The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C
Lewontin, R.: 1997, ‘The Confusion Over Cloning,’ The New York Review of Books, http://www.nybooks.com/nyrev/archives.html, 1–7.
Macer, D.: 1991, ‘Whose Genome Project?,’ Bioethics 5, 183–211.
MacIntyre, A.: 1984, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Second Edition, University of Notre Dame Press, South Bend.
Maynard-Moody, S.: 1995, The Dilemma of the Fetus, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
McCormick, R.: 1996, ‘Human Reproduction: Dominion and Limits,’ The Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6, 387–392.
McGee, G.: 1997, The Perfect Baby, Rowman and Littlefield, New York.
Meilaender, G.: 1997, ‘Remarks on Human Cloning,’ Testimony presented to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, March 13, 1997, http://www.all.org/abac/clon-prt.htm, 1–3.
Mirkes, R.: 2001, ‘NBAC and Embryo Ethics’, The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 1, 163–187.
Nagel, T.: 1979, ‘War and Massacre,’ in Mortal Questions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 53–74.
Noddings, N.: 1984, Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Oderberg, D.S.: 1997, ‘Modal Properties, Moral Status, and Identity,’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 26, 259–298.
Persson, I.: 1995, ‘Genetic Therapy, Identity, and the Person-Regarding Reasons,’ Bioethics 9, 16–31.
Porter, J.: 1995, ‘Individuality, Personal Identity, and the Moral Status of the Pre-embryo: A Response to Mark Johnson,’ Theological Studies 56, 763–770.
Purdy, L.: 1996, Reproducing Persons: Issues in Feminist Bioethics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Radin, M.: 1987, ‘Market-Inalienability,’ Harvard Law Review 100, 1849–1937
Rawls, J.: 1972, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Raz, J.: 1986, The Morality of Freedom, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Resnick, D.: 1994, ‘Debunking the Slippery Slope Argument Against Human Germ-Line Therapy,’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19, 23–40.
Richards, D.A.J.: 1986, Toleration and the Constitution, Oxford University Press, 1986.
Rix, B.: 1991, ‘Should Ethical Concerns Regulate Science? The European Experience With the Human Genome Project,’ Bioethics 5, 250–6.
Robertson, J.: 1994a, Children of Choice, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Robertson, J.: 1994b, ‘The Question of Human Cloning,’ The Hastings Center Report 24, 6–14.
Rosenberg, A.: 1996, ‘The Human Genome Project: Research Tactics and Economic Strategies,’ Social Philosophy and Policy 13, 1–17.
Shannon, T. and Wolter, A.: 1990, ‘Reflections on the Moral Status of the Pre-embryo,’ Theological Studies 51, 743–763.
Shannon, T.: 1997a, ‘Fetal Status: Sources and Implications,’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22, 415–22.
Shannon, T.: 1997b, ‘Response to Khushf,’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (1997) 525–7.
Silver, L.: 1998, Remaking Eden: Cloning and Beyond in a Brave New World, Avon Books, New York.
Skene, L.: 1991, ‘Mapping the Human Genome: Some Thoughts for Those Who Say “There Ought to be a Law on It”,’ Bioethics 5, 233–49.
Smith, J.: 1993, Why Humanae Vitae Was Right: A Reader, Ignatius Press, San Francisco.
Spoerl, J.: ‘In Vitro Fertilization and the Ethics of Procreation,’ Ethics and Medicine 15, 10–14.
Strong, C.: 1997a, Ethics in Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Strong, C.: 1997b, ‘The Moral Status of Preembryos, Embryos, Fetuses, and Infants,’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22, 457–78.
Strong, C.: 1997c, ‘Response to Khushf,’ The Journal of Philosophy and Medicine, 22 521–23.
Suarez, A.: 1990, ‘Hydatidiform Moles and Teratomas Confirm the Human Identity of the Preimplantation Zygote,’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15, 627–35.
Tauer, C.: ‘Embryo Research and Public Policy: A Philosopher’s Appraisal,’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22, 423–39.
The Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society: 1992, ‘Ethical Considerations of In Vitro Fertilization,’ in Alpern, K., ed., The Ethics of Reproductive Technology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 301–5.
Tollefsen, C.: 2000, ‘Embryos, Individuals, and Persons: An Argument Against Embryo Creation and Research,’ Journal of Applied Philosophy 18, 65–78.
Thomson, J.: 1971, ‘A Defense of Abortion,’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, 47–66.
Tong, R.: 1997, Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
Torres, J.: 1997, ‘On the Limits of Enhancement in Human Gene Transfer: Drawing the Line,’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22, 43–53.
Warnock, M.: 1985, A Question of Life: The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Warren, M.: 1973, ‘On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion,’ The Monist 57, 43–61.
Wiesenthal, D. and Wiener, N.: 1996, ‘Privacy and the Human Genome Project,’ Ethics and Behavior 6, 189–201.
Zohar, N.: 1991, ‘Prospects for ‘Genetic Therapy’ — Can a Person Benefit From Being Altered’, Bioethics 5, 275–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tollefsen, C. (2004). Sic Et Non: Some Disputed Questions in Reproductive Ethics. In: Khushf, G. (eds) Handbook of Bioethics. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 78. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2127-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2127-5_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1870-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2127-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive