Abstract
Monitoring estuarine programs are fundamental to evaluate pollution abatement actions, fulfillment of environmental quality standards and compliance with permit conditions. Their sampling designs should provide statistically unbiased estimates of the status and trends with quantitative confidence limits on spatial scale. The aim of this work is to select a subset of monitoring sampling stations based on locations from an extensive sediment campaign (153 sites) in the Sado estuary (Portugal). In each location three sediment parameters were determined with the objective of defining spatially homogenous environmental areas. The new monitoring program is based on fewer and on the most representative monitoring stations inside each homogeneous environmental area for their future contaminant assessment. Simulated annealing was used to iteratively improve on the mean square error of estimation, by removing one station at a time and estimating it by indicator kriging using the remaining stations in the sub-set, within a controlled non-exhaustive looping scheme. Different sub-set cardinalities were tested in order to determine the optimal cost-benefit relationship between the number of stations and monitoring costs. The model results indicate a 60 station design to be optimal, but 17 additional stations were added based on expert criteria of proximity to point sources and characterization of all homogenous areas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Araujo, R., Vasconcelos, L. and Painho, M. SADIND — Sistema de Visualização Interpretativa para a Gestão Ambiental, Biologia (In Press), 2002.
Caeiro, S., Goovaerts, P., Painho, M., Costa, M. H. and Sousa, S. Optimal spatial sampling design for mapping estuarine sediment management areas. Ruiz, M., Gould, M., and Ramon, J. (Ed.) 5th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science; Palma, Spain. Universitat de les Illes Balears, 389–396, 2002a.
Caeiro, S., Painho M., Costa, M. H. and Ramos, T. B. Sado Estuary Ecosystem: a management methodology. Fernando Pessoa University. Duarte, P. (Ed.) Proceedings of International Conference on Sustainable Management of Coastal Ecosystems; Porto, Portugal. Fernando Pessoa University, 2002b.
Clark, W. and Hosking, P. Statistical Methods for Geographers. John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
Cochran, W. Sampling Techniques. 3rd edition ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977.
Cressie, N. Statistics for Spatial Data. Revised Edition. John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
Deutsch, C. and Journel, A. G. GSLIB. Geostatistical Software Library and Users’s Guide. 2nd edition. Oxford University Press, 1998.
Goovaerts, P. Comparative performance of indicator algorithms for modeling conditional probability distribution functions. Mathematical Geology, 1994; 26(3):389–411.
Goovaerts, P. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Haining, R. Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Kirkpatrick, S., Gellat, Jr. C. D. and Vecchi, M. P. Optimization by simulated annealing: Science, 1983; 220:671–680.
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H. and Teller, E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines: The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1953; 21: 1087–1092.
Neves, R. J. J. Hidrodynamical Modelling as a Toll in Waste Disposal Selection. A Case Study on Sado Estuary. Kullenberg (ed.). The Role of the Oceans as a Waste Disposal Option, 1986, pp. 563–576.
Oliver, M. A. and Webster, R. A Geostatistical Basis for Spatial Weighting in Multivariate Classification. Mathematical Geology, 1989; 21(1):15–35.
Olsen, A. R., Sedransk, J., Edwards, D., Gotway, C. A., Liggett, W., Rathbun, S., Reckhow, K., Young, L. Statistical issues for monitoring ecological and natural resources in the United States. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1999; 54:1–45.
Rodrigues, A. and Quintino, V. Horizontal Biosedimentary Gradients Across the Sado Estuary, W. Portugal. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 1993; 27(2–4):449–464.
Strobel, C., Paul, J., Hughes, M., Buffum, H., Brown, B. and Summers, K. Using Information on Spatial Variability of Small Estuaries in Designing Large-scale Estuarine Monitoring Programs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2000; 63:223–236.
Van Groenigen, J. W., Pieters, G. and Stein, A. Optimizing spatial sampling for multivariate contamination in urban areas. Environmetrics, 2000; 11:227–244.
Vos, P., Meelis, E. and Keurs, W. J. A framework for the design of ecological monitoring programs as a tool for environmental and nature management. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2000; 61:317–344.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this paper
Cite this paper
Caeiro, S. et al. (2004). Optimization of an Estuarine Monitoring Program: Selecting the Best Spatial Distribution. In: Sanchez-Vila, X., Carrera, J., Gómez-Hernández, J.J. (eds) geoENV IV — Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2115-1_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2115-1_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2007-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2115-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive