Abstract
Statistical correlation between spatial variables depends on the distance between locations and the direction of travel from one to the other. Geostatistical interpolation most often uses the Euclidean distance between observations. But since most surfaces in nature are convoluted, with edges and breaks, anything that travels along them is thereby constrained. Smog, for instance, is blocked by hills and mountains. Animals migrate around lakes, mountains, and settlements. Contaminants in water follow the coastline. This paper proposes using cost weighted distance, a common raster function in GIS (Geographical Information Systems) that calculates the cost of travel from one cell of a grid to the next, making it the natural choice of the distance metric for spatial interpolation. Determining cost value at each location is discussed, as is calculation of distances between sampled locations and unsampled ones. Also covered is how to choose a valid covariance model with barriers defined by cost surface. We illustrate the approach using publicly available ozone data in California, where mountains are the natural barriers for smog propagation, and nutrients data in the Chesapeake Bay, where the coastline forms non-transparent barrier for chemical propagation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aldworth, J. (1998). Spatial Prediction, Spatial Sampling, and Measurement Error. Ph.D. thesis. Iowa State University.
Barry, R. P. and Ver Hoef, J. (1996). Blackbox kriging: spatial prediction without specifying variogram models, J. Ag. Bio. and Eco. Statist. 3: 1–25.
Carroll, S.S. and Cressie, N. 1996. A comparison of geostatistical methodologies used to estimate snow water equivalent. Journal of the American Water Resources association, Vol. 32, No. 2, 267–278.
Cressie, N. 1993. Statistics for spatial data, Wiley, New York.
Cressie, N. and Pavlicova M. 2002. Calibrated spatial moving average simulations. Statistical Modeling, 2, 1–13.
Curriero, F. C. 1997. The use of non-Euclidean distances in geostatistics, PhD thesis.
Curriero, F. C. 2003. Norm dependent isotropic covariogram and variogram models. In print.
Dubois, G. 2001. Intégration de Systèmes ďInformations Géographiques (SIG) et de méthodes géostatistiques. University of Lausanne, Ph. D. Thesis (In French). 260 pp.
Gandin, L.S. 1963. Objective Analysis of Meteorological Fields. Gidrometeorologicheskoe Izdatel’stvo (GIMIZ), Leningrad (translated by Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1965).
Higdon, D. 1998. A process-convolution approach to modeling temperatures in the North Atlantic Ocean, Journal of Environmental and Ecological Statistics 5, 173–190.
Krivoruchko K., 2001. Using linear and non-linear kriging interpolators to produce probability maps. Available from ESRI online at http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcgisxtensions/geostatistical/research_papers.html
Krivoruchko K. and Gribov A. 2002. Working on Nonstationarity Problems in Geostatistics Using Detrending and Transformation Techniques: An Agricultural Case Study. Available from ESRI online at http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcgisxtensions/geostatistical/research_papers.html
Little LS, Edwards D, Porter D.E. 1997. Kriging in estuaries: as the crow flies or as the fish swims? Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology, 213, pp. 1–11.
Oliver, D.S. 1995. Moving averages for Gaussian simulation in two and three dimensions. Mathematical Geology, 27, 8, 939–960.
Rathbun, S. 1998. Spatial modeling in irregularly shaped regions: kriging estuaries. Environmetrics, 9, 109–129.
Sedgewick, R. 2002. Algorithms in C++. Graph algorithms. Addison-Wesley, 496 p.
Ver Hoef, J.M. 1993. Universal kriging for ecological data. Pages 447–453 in Ver Hoef, J. and Barry, R. P. (1998). Constructing and fitting models for cokriging and multivariable spatial prediction. J. Statist. Planning and Inference 69, 275–294.
Ver Hoef, J. M., Cressie, N., and Barry, R. P. (2001). Flexible spatial models for kriging and cokriging using moving averages and the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). Department of Statistics Preprint No. 675, The Ohio State University.
Yao, T. and Journel, A.G. 1998. Automatic modeling of (cross)covariance tables using fast Fourier transform. Mathematical Geology 30, 589–615.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this paper
Cite this paper
Krivoruchko, K., Gribov, A. (2004). Geostatistical Interpolation and Simulation in the Presence of Barriers. In: Sanchez-Vila, X., Carrera, J., Gómez-Hernández, J.J. (eds) geoENV IV — Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2115-1_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2115-1_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2007-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2115-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive