Skip to main content

Spatial Prediction of Categorical Variables: The BME Approach

  • Conference paper
geoENV IV — Geostatistics for Environmental Applications

Part of the book series: Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics ((QGAG,volume 13))

  • 565 Accesses

Abstract

Categorical variables often comes naturally and play an important role in environmental studies. Traditionally, they are processed in the geostatistical spatial estimation context using the indicator formalism. However, the indicator approach induces several and serious theoretical and practical problems. Among others, let us mention the inconsistencies and limitations of the linear model of coregionalisation, heavy computational load for taking simultaneously into account several categories, the limited pertinence of a linear predictor, and the incoherence of the predicted probabilities (negative probabilities, probabilities that do not sum up to one, etc.). This paper proposes a nonlinear approach that can be viewed as an extension of the Bayesian Maximum Entropy (BME) methods in the framework of categorical variables. The method is based on a maximum entropy reconstruction of high dimensional probabilities tables that are conditioned on their two-dimensional margins, followed by a conditioning of the table. The superiority of the BME approach over the indicator formalism is investigated both from the theoretical and practical point of views using an example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bogaert, P. (2002). Spatial prediction of categorical variables: the Bayesian maximum entropy approach. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 16: 425–448.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carle, S.F., and Fogg, G.E. (1996). Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics. Mathematical Geology, 28: 453–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiles, J.-P., and Delfiner, P. (1999). Geostatistics — Modeling Spatial Uncertainty. Wiley, New York, 695pp.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christakos G. (1990). A Bayesian/maximum entropy view to the spatial estimation problem. Mathematical Geology, 22: 763–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Christakos G. and Li, X. (1998). Bayesian maximum entropy analysis and mapping: a farewell to kriging estimators?. Mathematical Geology, 30: 435–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Christakos G. (1991). Some applications of the Bayesian maximum entropy concept in geostatistics. Fundamental Theories of Physics, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Boston, 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christakos G. (2000). Modern Spatiotemporal Geostastistics. Oxford University Press, New York, 312 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Christakos, G., Bogaert, P. and Serre, M. (2002). Temporal Geographical Information Systems: A Bayesian Maximum Entropy Primer for Natural and Epidemiological Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York, 250 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deming, W.E. and Stephan, F.F. (1940). On a least squares adjustement of a sampled frequency table when the expected marginal totals are known. Ann. Math. Statist., 11: 427–444.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D’Or, D., Bogaert, P. and Christakos, G. (2001). Application of the BME approach to soil texture mapping. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment: 15, 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Good, I.J. (1963). Maximum entropy for hypotheses formulation especially for mutidimensional contingency tables. Ann. Math. Statist., 34: 911–934.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goulard, M. and Voltz, M. (1992). Linear coregionalization model: Tools for estimation and choice of cross-variogram matrix. Mathematical Geology, 24: 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goovaerts, P. (1997). Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York, 496 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Journel, A.G. (1983). Non-parametric estimation of spatial distributions. Mathematical Geology, 15: 445–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Journel, A.G., and Huijbregts, C.J. (1978). Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press, New York, 600 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lajaunie, C. (1990). Comparing some approximate methods for building local confidence intervals for predicting regionalized variables. Mathematical Geology, 22: 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bogaert, P. (2004). Spatial Prediction of Categorical Variables: The BME Approach. In: Sanchez-Vila, X., Carrera, J., Gómez-Hernández, J.J. (eds) geoENV IV — Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2115-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2115-1_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2007-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2115-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics