Skip to main content

A Stochastic Game Model of Tax Evasion

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games ((AISDG,volume 8))

Abstract

The problem of tax evasion is modelled as a zero-sum two-person generalized stochastic game with incomplete information. This model incorporates the classical statistical classification procedures used in classifying a random observation from a mixed population. The model incorporates the secrecy of the tax office and lack of information about the past history of the taxpayer. With full information, the model is closer to certain structured classes of stochastic games that admit efficient algorithms for optimal solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allingham, M., Inequality and progressive taxation, J. Public Economics, 11, 273–274 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allingham, M. and A. Sandmo, Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis, J. Public Economics, 1, 323–338 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, T.W., An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Wiley, New York (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arrow, K.J., Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing, Markham, Chicago (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aumann, R.J. and M. Maschler, Repeated Games with Incomplete Information, M.I.T Press, Cambridge, MA (1995).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Balbir, S., Making honesty the best policy, J. Public Economics, 2, 257–263 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blackwell, D. and G.A. Girschick, Theory of Games and Statistical Decisions, Wiley, New York (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clotfelter, C., Tax evasion and tax rates: An analysis of individual returns, Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, 363–373 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cross, R.B. and G.K. Shaw, The evasion-avoidance choice: A suggested approach, Nat’l Tax Journal, 34, 487–491 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, J.S., Hecht, G., and J.D. Perkins, Social behaviors, enforcement and tax compliance, The Accounting Review, 78, 39–69 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dubin, J.A., Graetz, M.J., and L.L. Wilde, Are we a nation of tax cheaters? New econometric evidence on tax compliance, The American Economic Review, 77, 240–245 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dvoretzky, A., Wald, A., and J. Wolfowitz, Elimination of randomization in certain statistical decision procedures and zero-sum two person games, Ann. Math. Stat., 22, 1–21 (1951).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Erard, B. and J. S. Feinstein, Honesty and evasion in the tax compliance game, Rand J. Economics, 25, 1–19 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferguson, T.S., Mathematical Statistics: A Decision Theoretic Approach, Academic Press, New York (1967).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Filar, J.A. and O.J. Vrieze, Competitive Markov Decision Processes, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fisher, R.A., The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems, Ann. Eugenics, 7, 179–188 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frank, M. and M. Dekeyser, A tax discrepancy coefficient resulting from tax evasion or tax expenditures, J. Public Economics, 8, 67–78 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Friedland, N., Maital, S., and A. Rutenberg, A simulation study of income tax evasion, J. Public Economics, 10, 107–116 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Greenberg, J., Avoiding tax avoidance: A (repeated) game theoretic approach, J. Economic Theory, 32, 1–13 (1984).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Harsanyi, J., Games with incomplete information played by Bayesian players, I–III, Management Science, 14, 159–182; 320–334; 486–502 (1967–68).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Kolm, S.C., A note on tax evasion, J. Public Economics, 2, 265–270 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Landsberger, M. and I. Meiljison, Incentive generating state dependent penalty system: The case on income tax evasion, J. Public Economics, 19, 333–352 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Melolidakis, C.A., Stochastic games with lack of information on one side and positive stop probabilities, pp. 113–126, in: Stochastic Games and Related Topics, Raghavan, T.E.S., Ferguson, T.S., Parthasarathy, T., and O.J. Vrieze (eds.), Kluwer Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Monk, K.A., Income tax evasion: Some empirical evidence, J. Public Finance, 30, 70–76 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mookherjee, D. and I. Png, Optimal auditing, insurance and redistribution, The Quarterly J. Economics, 104, 399–415 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Morrison, D.F., Mutivariate Statistical Methods, Fourth Edition, Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Murphy, J.H., EDP and tax administration in New York, Nat’l Tax Journal, 14, 223–227 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Parthasarathy, T. and T.E.S. Raghavan, An order field property for stochastic games when one player controls transition probabilities, J. Optimization Theory and Appl., 33, 375–392 (1981).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Pond, C.B., Derivation and application of norms in selecting audit, Nat’l Tax Journal, 14, 227–231 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Raghavan, T.E.S. and Z. Syed, A policy-improvement type algorithm for solving zero-sum two-person stochastic games of perfect information, Math. Program., 95, 513–532 (2003).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Raghavan, T.E.S. and Z. Syed, Computing stationary Nash equilibria of undiscounted single-controller stochastic games, Math. Oper. Res., 27, 384–400 (2002).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Rao, C.R., Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometric Research, Wiley, New York (1952).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Rao, C.R., Discrimination among groups and assigning new individuals: The role of methodology of classification in psychiatry and psychopathology, 229–240, U.S. Dept. of Health Education and Welfare (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Reinganum, J. and L. Wilde, Income tax compliance in a principal agent framework, J. Public Economics, 26, 1–18 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Reinganum, J. and L. Wilde, Equilibrium verification and reporting policies in a model of tax compliance, International Economic Review, 27, 739–760 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosenberg, D., Solon, E., and N. Vieille, Stochastic games with a single controller and incomplete information, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 43, 86–110 (2004).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Rosenberg, D., Solon, E., and N. Vieille, Stochastic games with imperfect monitoring (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shapley, L.S., Stochastic games, Proc. Nat’l Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 39, 1095–1100 (1953).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith, W.H., Developing a new technique in selecting returns for audit, J. Accountancy, 123, 22–23 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sorin, S., Big Match with lack of information on one side, Internat. J. Game Theory, 14, 173–204 (1985).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Sorin, S., A First Course on Zero-Sum Repeated Games, Springer-Verlag, New York (2002).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Spicer, M.W., A behavioral model of tax evasion, Ph.D. Thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Spicer, M.W. and L.A. Becker, Fiscal inequity and tax evasion: An experimental approach, Nat’l Tax Journal, 33, 171–175 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Spicer, M.W. and S.B. Lundstedt, Public Finance, 31, 295–305 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Srinivasan, T.N., Tax evasion: A model, J. Public Economics, 2, 339–346 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Strumpel, B., Contributions of survey research, in: A. Peacock (ed.), Quantitative Analysis in Public Finance, 29–32, Praeger Publ., New York (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Vogel, J., Taxation and public opinion in Sweden: An interpretation of recent data, Nat’l Tax Journal, 27, 499–514 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Vrieze, O.J., Stochastic games with finite state and action spaces, Ph.D. Thesis, Free University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wald, A., Statistical Decision Functions, Wiley, New York (1950).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raghavan, T.E.S. (2006). A Stochastic Game Model of Tax Evasion. In: Haurie, A., Muto, S., Petrosjan, L.A., Raghavan, T.E.S. (eds) Advances in Dynamic Games. Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, vol 8. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4501-2_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics