Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Statistics for Industry and Technology ((SIT))

Abstract

The t-distribution is a very usual distribution for several test statistics because a normal distribution is frequently assumed as underlying model. Even in some tests based on robust statistics, such as the test based on the sample trimmed mean, a t-distribution is used as distribution for the standardized sample trimmed mean if the underlying model is normal. Nevertheless, it is necessary to have a deeper understanding of the behaviour of these kind of tests and the computations of their key elements, such as the p-value and the critical value, with small samples, when the underlying model is close but different from the normal distribution. In this paper, we obtain good analytic approximations, with small samples, for the p-value and the critical value of a t-test (i.e., a test with a t-distribution for the test statistic under a normal model), studying its behaviour when the underlying distribution is close but different from the normal model. We conclude the paper with a discussion on some robustness properties of t-tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benjamini, Y. (1983). Is the t test really conservative when the parent distribution is long-tailed?, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 645–654.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, H., and Loh, W. Y. (1990). Uniform robustness against nonnormality of the t and F tests, Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 19, 3707–3723.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Cressie, N. (1980). Relaxing assumptions in the one sample t-test, Australian Journal of Statistics, 22, 143–153.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Daniels, H. E. (1983). Saddlepoint approximations for estimating equations, Biometrika, 70, 89–96.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Field, C. A., and Ronchetti, E. (1985). A tail area influence function and its application to testing, Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 14, 19–41.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Filippova, A. A. (1961). Mises’ theorem on the asymptotic behaviour of functionals of empirical distribution functions and its statistical applications, Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 7, 24–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. García-Pérez, A. (2003). Von Mises’ approximation of the critical value of a test, Test, 12, 385–411.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. García-Pérez, A. (2004). Chi-square tests under models close to the normal distribution, Technical Report, Departamento de Estadística, Investigación Operativa y Cálculo Numérico, UNED, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jensen, J. L. (1995). Saddlepoint Approximations, Clarendon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, A. F. S., and Gurland, J. (1977). One-sample t-test when sampling from a mixture of normal distributions, The Annals of Statistics, 5, 803–807.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Loh, W. Y. (1984). Bounds on AREs for restricted classes of distributions defined via tail-orderings, The Annals of Statistics, 12, 685–701.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lugannani, R., and Rice, S. (1980). Saddle point approximation for the distribution of the sum of independent random variables, Advances in Applied Probability, 12, 475–490.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel, K. R., Mudholkar, G. S., and Fernando, J. L. I. (1988). Student’s t approximations for three simple robust estimators, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1203–1210.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Reeds, J. A. (1976). On the Definitions of Von Mises’ Functionals, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sawilowsky, S. S., and Blair, R. C. (1992). A more realistic look at the robustness and type II error properties of the t test to departures from population normality, Psychological Bulletin, 111, 352–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Serfling, R. J. (1980). Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics, John Wiley_& Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Staudte, R. G., and Sheather, S. J. (1990). Robust Estimation and Testing, John Wiley_& Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Tukey, J. W., and McLaughlin, D. H. (1963). Less vulnerable confidence and significance procedures for location based on a single sample: Trimming/Winsorization 1, Sankhyā, Series A, 25, 331–352.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilcox, R. R. (1997). Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing, Academic Press, San Diego.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

García-Pérez, A. (2006). t-Tests with Models Close to the Normal Distribution. In: Balakrishnan, N., Sarabia, J.M., Castillo, E. (eds) Advances in Distribution Theory, Order Statistics, and Inference. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4487-3_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics