Skip to main content

Fisher Information and Tukey’s Linear Sensitivity Measure Based on Ordered Ranked Set Samples

  • Chapter
Advances in Distribution Theory, Order Statistics, and Inference

Part of the book series: Statistics for Industry and Technology ((SIT))

Abstract

(1995) derived the Fisher information and discussed the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of the parameters of a location-scale family \( F\left( {\tfrac{{x - \mu }} {\sigma }} \right) \) based on the ranked set sample (RSS). She found that a RSS provided more information about both μ and σ than a simple random sample (SRS) of the same size. We also focus here on the location-scale family. We use the idea of order statistics from independent and nonidentical random variables (INID) to propose an ordered ranked set sample (ORSS) and develop the Fisher information and the maximum likelihood estimation based on such an ORSS. We use logistic, normal, and one-parameter exponential distributions as examples and conclude that in all these three cases, the ORSS does not provide as much Fisher information as the RSS, and consequently the MLEs based on the ORSS (MLE-ORSS) are not as efficient as the MLEs based on the RSS (MLE-RSS). In addition to the MLEs, we are also interested in best linear unbiased estimators (BLUE). For this purpose, we apply another measure of information, viz., Tukey’s linear sensitivity. Tukey (1965) proposed linear sensitivity to measure information contained in an ordered sample. We use logistic, normal, one- and two-parameter exponential, two-parameter uniform, and right triangular distributions as examples and show that in all these cases except the one-parameter the RSS, and consequently the BLUEs based on the ORSS (BLUE-ORSS) are more efficient than the BLUEs based on the RSS (BLUE-RSS). In the case of one-parameter exponential, the ORSS has only slightly less information than the RSS with the relative efficiency being very close to 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balakrishnan, N. (Ed.) (1992). Handbook of the Logistic Distribution, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnett, V., and Barreto, M. C. M. (2001). Estimators for a Poisson parameter using ranked set sampling, Journal of Applied Statistics, 28, 929–941.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Barreto, M. C. M., and Barnett, V. (1999). Best linear unbiased estimators for the simple linear regression model using ranked set sampling, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 6, 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhoj, D. S., and Ahsanullah, M. (1996). Estimation of parameters of the generalized geometric distribution using ranked set sampling, Biometrics, 52, 685–694.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandrasekar, B., and Balakrishnan, N. (2002). On a multiparameter version of Tukey’s linear sensitivity measure and its properties, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 54, 796–805.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, Z. (1999). Density estimation using ranked set sampling data, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 6, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Z. (2000). The efficiency of ranked-set sampling relative to simple random sampling under multiparameter families, Statistica Sinica, 10, 247–263.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Chuiv, N. N., and Sinha, B. K. (1998). On some aspects of ranked set sampling in parametric estimation, In Handbook of Statistics (Eds., N. Balakrishnan and C. R. Rao) Vol. 17, pp. 337–377, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  9. David, H. A., and Nagaraja, H. N. (2003). Order Statistics, Third edition, John Wiley_& Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dell, T. R., and Clutter, J. L. (1972). Ranked set sampling theory with order statistics background, Biometrics, 28, 545–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hossain, S. S., and Muttlak, H. A. (2000). MVLUE of population parameters based on ranked set sampling, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 108, 167–176.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, Y., and Arnold, B. C. (1999). Parameter estimation under generalized ranked set sampling, Statistics_& Probability Letters, 42, 353–360.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kvam, P. H., and Tiwari, R. C. (1999). Bayes estimation of a distribution function using ranked set samples, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 6, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lloyd, E. H. (1952). Least squares estimation of location and scale parameters using order statistics, Biometrika, 39, 88–95.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. McIntyre, G. A. (1952). A method for unbiased selective sampling using ranked sets, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 3, 385–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagaraja, H. N. (1994). Tukey’s linear sensitivity and order statistics, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 46, 757–768.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Perron, F., and Sinha, B. K. (2004). Estimation of variance based on a ranked set sample, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 120, 21–28.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Stokes, S. L. (1977). Ranked set sampling with concomitant variables, Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 6, 1207–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stokes, S. L. (1980a). Estimation of variance using judgement ordered ranked set samples, Biometrics, 36, 35–42.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Stokes, S. L. (1980b). Inferences on the correlation coefficient in bivariate normal populations from ranked set samples, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 989–995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Stokes, S. L. (1995). Parametric ranked set sampling, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 47, 465–482.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Stokes, S. L., and Sager, T. W. (1988). Characterization of a ranked-set sample with application to estimating distribution functions, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 35–42.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Takahasi, K., and Wakimoto, K. (1968). On unbiased estimates of the population mean based on the sample stratified by means of ordering, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 20, 1–31.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Tietjen, G. L., Kahaner, D. K., and Beckman, R. J. (1977). Variances and covariances of the normal order statistics for sample sizes 2 to 50, In Selected Tables in Mathematical Statistics Vol. 5, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tukey, J. W. (1965). Which part of the sample contains the information? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 53, 127–134.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng, G., and Al-Saleh, M. F. (2003). Improving the best linear unbiased estimator for the scale parameter of symmetric distribution by using the absolute value of ranked set samples, Journal of Applied Statistics, 30, 253–265.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balakrishnan, N., Li, T. (2006). Fisher Information and Tukey’s Linear Sensitivity Measure Based on Ordered Ranked Set Samples. In: Balakrishnan, N., Sarabia, J.M., Castillo, E. (eds) Advances in Distribution Theory, Order Statistics, and Inference. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4487-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics