Skip to main content

Is Quantum Gravity Necessary?

  • Conference paper
The Universe of General Relativity

Part of the book series: Einstein Studies ((EINSTEIN,volume 11))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Butterfield, J. and C. J. Isham, C. J. (2001). Spacetime and the philosophical challenge of quantum gravity. In Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. Craig Callender and Nick Huggett, eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Preprint cited here, gr-qc/9903072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callender, Craig and Huggett, Nick, eds. (2001), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–30.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eppley, K. and Hannah, E. (1977). The Necessity of Quantizing the Gravitational Field. Foundations of Physics 7, 51–65.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1983). Foundations of Spacetime Theories. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1996). The Disunities of Science. In: The Disunity of Science. P. Galison and D. Stump, eds. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibble, T.W.B. (1981). Is a semiclassical Theory of Gravity Viable? In: Quantum Gravity 2, A Second Oxford Symposium. C.J. Isham, R. Penrose and D.W. Sciama, eds. Oxford: Clarendon, 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, James (in preparation). Why Eppley and Hannah’s Experiment Isn’t.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M. (1994). Unified Theories and Disparate Things. PSA 2, 365–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, P. and H. Putnam, H. (1958). Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis. In: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol.II, Concepts, Theories and the Mind-body Problem. H. Feigl, M. Scriven and G. Maxwell eds. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, D.N. and Geilker, C.D. (1981). Indirect evidence for quantum gravity. Physical Review Letters 47, 979–982.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, L. (1963). On quantization of fields. Nuclear Physics 40, 353–356.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rovelli, C. (2001). Quantum spacetime: what do we know? In: Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. Craig Callender and Nick Huggett eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001. Preprint cited here http://xxx.lanl.gov/gr-qc/9903045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, R.M. (1994). Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics. Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, R.M. (1999). Private Communication.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 The Center for Einstein Studies

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mattingly, J. (2005). Is Quantum Gravity Necessary?. In: Kox, A.J., Eisenstaedt, J. (eds) The Universe of General Relativity. Einstein Studies, vol 11. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4454-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics