Skip to main content

Matrix Preliminaries and General Linear Model

  • Chapter
Analysis of Variance for Random Models
  • 1683 Accesses

Abstract

Volume I of the text was devoted to a study of various models with the common feature that the same numbers of observations were taken from each treatment group or in each submost subcell. When these numbers are the same, the data are referred to as balanced data; in contrast, when the numbers of observations in the cells are not all equal, the data are known as unbalanced data. In general, it is desirable to have equal numbers of observations in each subclass since the experiments with unbalanced data are much more complex and difficult to analyze and interpret than the ones with balanced data. However, in many practical situations, it is not always possible to have equal numbers of observations for the treatments or groups. Even if an experiment is well-thought-out and planned to be balanced, it may run into problems during execution due to circumstances beyond the control of the experimenter; for example, missing values or deletion of faulty observations may result in different sample sizes in different groups or cells. In many cases, the data may arise through a sample survey where the numbers of observations per group cannot be predetermined, or through an experiment designed to yield balanced data but which actually may result in unbalanced data because some plants or animals may die, patients may drop out or be taken out of the study. For example, in many clinical investigations involving a follow-up, patients may decide to discontinue their participation, they may withdraw due to side effects, they may die, or they are simply lost to follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • A. Albert (1972), Regression and the Moore-Penrose Inverse, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. L. Anderson (1961), Designs for estimating variance components, in Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Design of Experiments and Army Preservation and Development Testing, 781–823; also published as Mim. Ser. 310, Institute of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. L. Anderson and P. P. Crump (1967), Comparisons of designs and estimation procedures for estimating parameters in a two-stage nested process, Technometrics, 9, 499–516.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • T. R. Bainbridge (1963), Staggered nested designs for estimating variance components, in American Society for Quality Control Annual Conference Transactions, American Society for Quality Control, Milwaukee, 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. B. Bapat and T. E. S. Raghavan (1997), Nonnegative Matrices and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • A. Basilevsky (1983), Applied Matrix Algebra in the Statistical Sciences, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • A. Ben-Israel and T. Greyville (1974), Generalized Inverses: Theory and Applications, Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • A. Berman and R. J. Plemmons (1994), Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences, 2nd ed., Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • N. Bush and R. L. Anderson (1963), Acomparison of three different procedures for estimating variance components, Technometrics, 5, 421–440.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • W. G. Cochran (1934), The distribution of quadratic forms in a normal system, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. Suppl., 4, 102–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Eisenhart (1947), The assumptions underlying the analysis of variance, Biometrics, 3, 1–21.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • J. E. Gentle (1998), Numerical Linear Algebra for Applications in Statistics, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • F. A. Graybill (1961), An Introduction to Linear Statistical Models, Vol. I, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • F. A. Graybill (1983), Introduction to Matrices with Applications in Statistics, 2nd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA; 1st ed., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. S. Hadi (1996), Matrix Algebra as a Tool, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. A. Harville (1997), Matrix Algebra from a Statistician’s Perspective, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • M. J. R. Healy (2000), Matrices for Statistics, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK; 1st ed., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Horn and C. R. Johnson (1985), Matrix Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • H. O. Lancaster (1954), Traces and cumulants of quadratic forms in normal variables, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 16, 247–254.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • W. Madow (1940), The distribution of quadratic forms in noncentral normal random variables, Ann. Math. Statist., 11, 100–101.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • J. R. Magnus and H. Neudecker (1999), Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and Econometrics, 2nd ed., Wiley, Chichester, UK.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • H. D. Muse and R. L. Anderson (1978), Comparison of designs to estimate variance components in a two-way classification model, Technometrics, 20, 159–166.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • H. D. Muse, R. L. Anderson, and B. Thitakamol (1982), Additional comparisons of designs to estimate variance components in a two-way classification model, Comm. Statist. A Theory Methods, 11, 1403–1425.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • R. Pringle and A. Raynor (1971), Generalized Inverse Matrices with Applications in Statistics, Hafner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. R. Rao and S. K. Mitra (1971), Generalized Inverse of Matrices and Its Applications, Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • C. R. Rao and M. B. Rao (1998), Matrix Algebra and Its Applications to Statistics and Econometrics, World Scientific, Singapore.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • H. ScheffĂ© (1959), The Analysis of Variance, Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • J. R. Schott (1997), Matrix Analysis for Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • S. R. Searle (1971), Linear Models, Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • S. R. Searle (1982), Matrix Algebra Useful for Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • S. R. Searle (1988), Mixed models and unbalanced data: Wherefrom, whereat, whereto?, Comm. Statist. A Theory Methods, 17, 935–968.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • E. Seneta (1981), Non-Negative Matrices and Markov Chains, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • P.-S. Shen, P. L. Cornelius, and R. L. Anderson (1996a), Planned unbalanced designs for estimation of quantitative genetic parameters I: Two-way matings, Biometrics, 52, 56–70.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • P.-S. Shen, P. L. Cornelius, and R. L. Anderson (1996b), Planned unbalanced designs for estimation of quantitative genetic parameters II, J. Agricultural Biol. Environ. Sci., 1, 490–505.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2005). Matrix Preliminaries and General Linear Model. In: Analysis of Variance for Random Models. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4425-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics