Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interaction in Social Networks

  • Chapter
Book cover Handbook of Social Psychology

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, R. G. (1998). The demise of territorial determinism: Online friendships. In R. G. Adams & G. Allan (Eds.), Placing friendship in context (pp. 153–182). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. G., & Torr, R. (1998). Factors underlying the structure of older adult friendship networks. Social Networks 20, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review 27, 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, C. R., Loving, T. J., & Drigotas, S. M. (2001). Substituting the forest for the trees: Social networks and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81, 1042–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, L. A., & Widenmann, S. (1993). Revealing and not revealing the status of romantic relationships to social networks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 10, 321–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. A. (1991). Gender, friendship network, density, and loneliness. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 6, 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding, and the development of interpersonal relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 122–144). Oxford: Basil Blackwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., & Sailor, L. (1982). Informant accuracy in social network research V: An experimental attempt to predict actual communication from recall data. Social Policy 46, 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E., & Lopes, J. (1997). A temporal model of relationship satisfaction and stability. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Hojjat (Eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 129–159). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blieszner, R., & Adams, R. G. (1992). Adult friendship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannan, P. (1970). The six stations of divorce. In P. Bohannan (Ed.), Divorce and after (pp. 33–62). New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bott, E. (1957, 1971). Family and social networks. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. W., & Harris, T. (1978). Social origins of depression: A study of psychiatric disorder in women. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, C. M., & Conger, R. D. (1999). Marital success and domains of social support in long-term relationships: Does the influence of network members ever end? Journal of Marriage and the Family 61, 437–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, E., & Milardo, R. M. (1995). Marital interdependence and social networks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 12, 403–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J. (1997). An identity model for network exchange. American Sociological Review 62, 134–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1980). Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology 6, 79–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology 92, 1287–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, L. L. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist 54, 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of Heider’s theory. Psychological Review 63, 277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., & Whitmeyer, J. M. (1992). Two approaches to social structure: Exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Review of Sociology 18, 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, S., Antili, J., & Cunningham, J. (1993). Network structure, network support, and the marital satisfaction of husbands and wives. Australian Journal of Psychology 45, 176–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. C., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Going beyond social support: The role of social relationships in adaptation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 5, 454–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. C., & Downey, G. (1991). Social factors and psychopathology: Stress, social support, and coping processes. Annual Review of Psychology 42, 401–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A. (1967). Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Human Relations 20, 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A., & Leinhart, S. (1972). The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. In J. Berger (Ed.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 218–251). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental interference and romantic love: The Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duck, S. W. (1982). A topography of relationship disengagement and dissolution. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships 4: Dissolving personal relationships. London and New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duck, S. W. (1994). Strategems, spoils, and a serpent’s tooth: On the delights and dilemmas of personal relationships. In W. R. Cupach & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 3–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103, 281–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, K. (1997). Centrality in affiliation networks. Social Networks 19, 157–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, S. L. (1991). Why your friends have more friends than you do. American Journal of Sociology 96, 1464–1477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, S. L., & Elmore, R. (1982). Patterns of sociometric choices: Transitivity reconsidered. Social Psychology Quarterly 45, 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, S. L., & Carter, W. C. (1998) When desegregation reduces interracial contact: A class size paradox for weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 103(5), 1165–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felmlee, D. (2001). No couple is an island: A social network perspective on dyadic stability. Social Forces 79(4), 1259–1287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Bassin, E. (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationships: A hazard model. Social Psychology Quarterly 53, 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felmlee, D., & Greenberg, D. (1999). A dynamic systems model of dyadic interaction. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 22, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Close relationships and social psychology: Intersection and future paths. Social Psychology Quarterly 63, 365–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1, 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1992). Filling in the blanks: A theory of cognitive categories and the structure of social affiliation. Social Psychology Quarterly 55, 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin, N. E. (1993). Structural bases of interpersonal influence in groups: A longitudinal case study. American Sociological Review 58, 861–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin, N. E. (1998). A structural theory of social influence. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin, N. E. (1999). Choice shift and group polarization. American Sociological Review 64, 856–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. (1993). Social network analysis: Concepts, methodology, and directions for the 1990’s. Sociological Methods & Research 22, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan, M. (1974). A structural model of sentiment relations. American Journal of Sociology 80, 364–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan, M., & Kubitschek, W. N. (1990). The formation of intransitive friendships. Social Forces 69, 505–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1970). A method for detecting structure in sociometric data. American Journal of Sociology 70, 492–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988). Structures and processes of social support. Annual Review of Sociology 14, 293–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L., & Burgess, R. L. (1979). The analysis of social exchange in developing relationships. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 3–28). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., & Leslie, L. (1982). Couple involvement and network structure: A test of the dyadic withdrawal hypothesis. Social Psychology Quarterly 45, 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien, D., & Markman, H. (1991). Social support and social networks as determinants of individual and marital outcomes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 8, 549–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien, D., Chartrand, E., & Bégin, J. (1999). Social networks, structural interdependence, and conjugal adjustment in heterosexual, gay, and lesbian couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family 61, 516–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., & McLeod, J. D. (1985). Social support and mental health in community samples. In S. Cohen & L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 219–240). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koku, E., Nazer, N., & Wellman, B. (2001). Netting scholars: Online and offline. American Behavioral Scientist 44, 1752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly 51, 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D., & Kilduff, M. (1999). Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76, 770–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhayay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist 53(9), 1017–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L. A., Huston, T. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1986). Parental reactions to dating relationships: Do they make a difference? Journal of Marriage and the Family 48, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. A. (1973). Social reactions and the formation of dyads: An interactionist approach to mate selection. Sociometry 36, 400–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorrain, F., & White, H. C. (1971). Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1, 49–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P. V., & Friedkin, N. E. (1993). Network studies of social influence. Sociological Methods & Research 22, 127–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsiglio, W, & Scanzoni, J. (1995). Families and friendships. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4, 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27, 415–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, A., & Contractor, N. S. (1992). Structural position and perceived similarity. Social Psychology Quarterly 55, 300–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milardo, R. M. (1982). Friendship networks in developing relationships: Converging and diverging social environments. Social Psychology Quarterly 45, 162–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milardo, R. M. (1986). Personal choice and social constraint in close relationships: Applications of network analysis. In V. J. Derlega & B. A. Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 145–166). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milardo, R. M. (1987). Changes in social networks of women and men following divorce. A review. Journal of Family Issues 8, 78–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milardo, R. M., & Allan, G. (1996). Social networks and marital relationships. In S. Duck, K. Dindia, W. Ickes, R. Milardo, R. Mills, & B. Saranson (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 505–522). London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelationships. Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D., Carder, P., & Neal, M. (1997). Are some relationships more useful than others? The value of similar others in the networks of recent widows. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 14, 745–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J., & Hunter, A. G. (1999). Black couples, white couples: The early years of marriage. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Coping with divorce, single-parenting, and remarriage (pp. 23–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, M. D., Erdly, W. W., & Becker, J. (1987). Social networks: We get by with (and in spite of) a little help from our friends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53, 793–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, M. R., Stan, C. M., & Eggert, L. L. (1983). Romantic involvement and social network involvement. Social Psychology Quarterly 46, 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Communication networks and the development of romantic relationships: An expansion of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research 10, 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, M. R., & Eggert, L. L. (1991). The role of social context in the dynamics of personal relationships. In W. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 2, pp. 1–34). London: Jessica Kinglsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescosolido, B. A. (1992). Beyond rational choice: The social dynamics of how people seek help. American Journal of Sociology 97, 1096–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinquart, M., & Sorensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging 15, 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24, 1024–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rands, M. (1988). Changes in social networks following marital separation and divorce. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Families and social networks (pp. 127–146). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G., & Gindoff, P. (1992). Methodological relationism: Lessons for and from social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly 55, 128–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rook, K. S., & Pietromonaco, P. (1987). Close relationships: Ties that heal or ties that bind? In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 1, pp. 1–35). Greenwich, CN: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosnow, R. L. (2001). Rumor and gossip in interpersonal interaction and beyond: A social exchange perspective. In R. M. Kowalski (Ed.), Behaving badly: Aversive behaviors in interpersonal relationships (pp. 203–232). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook (2nd ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skvoretz, J., & Fararo, T. (1996). Status and participation in task groups: A dynamic network model. American Journal of Sociology 101, 1366–1414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. E. (1963). On social regression. American Sociological Review 28, 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B., & Thompson, L. (Eds.). (1984). Parting: The aftermath of separation and divorce. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). The influence of parents and friends on the quality and stability of romantic relationships: A three-wave longitudinal investigation. Journal of Marriage and the Family 54, 888–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2000). Romantic partners’ perceptions of social network attributes with the passage of time and relationship transitions. Personal Relationships 7, 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Orbuch, T. L., & Willett, M. C. (2002). Social networks and change in personal relationships. In A. Vangelisti, H. Reis, & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships: Vol. 2; Stability and change in relationship behavior (pp. 257–284). Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, C. B. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for surviving in a black community. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, C. H., Bush, E. G., Ross, R. R., & Ward, M. (1992). Mine, yours and ours: A configural analysis of the networks of married couples in relation to marital satisfaction and individual well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 9, 365–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surra, C., & Milardo, R. (1991). The social psychological context of developing relationships: Psychological and interactive networks. In D. Perlman & W. Jones, Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 3, pp. 1–36). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. J., Chatters, L. M., & Jackson, J. S. (1993). A profile of familial relations among three-generation black families. Family Relations 42, 332–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornes, B., & Collard, J. (1979). Who divorces? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, S. G., Veroff, J., & Hatchett, S. (1996). Family ties and marital happiness: The different marital experiences of black and white newlywed couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 13, 335–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uehara, E. S. (1990). Dual exchange theory, social networks, and informal social support. American Journal of Sociology 96, 521–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veroff, J., Douvan, E., & Hatchett, S. J. (1995). Marital instability: A social and behavioral study of the early years. Westport, CN: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. E., Wasserman, S., & Wellman, B. (1993). Statistical models for social support networks. Sociological Methods & Research 22, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. S. (1975). Marital separation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 19–61). New York: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., & Worley, S. (1990). Different strokes for different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology 96, 558–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., & Hampton, K. (1999). Living networked on and offline. Contemporary Sociology 28, 648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology 22, 213–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H., Boorman, S., & Breiger, R. (1976). Social structures from multiple networks: Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology 81, 731–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, E., & Jost, J. (2001). What makes you think you’re so popular? Self evaluation maintenance and the subjective size of the “friendship paradox”. Social Psychology Quarterly 64, 207–223.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociolgy, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616

    Diane H. Felmlee

Authors
  1. Diane H. Felmlee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

    John Delamater

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Felmlee, D.H. (2006). Interaction in Social Networks. In: Delamater, J. (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36921-X_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation