Abstract
This paper describes findings from the Penceil Project, which aims to explore the experiences of nonusers and minimal users of ICTs, how nonuse affects their inclusion or exclusion from society, and how they can learn to use ICTs to meet their personal goals. The paper considers the applicability of the technology adoption model (TAM) to understanding the experiences of this group of people. By looking at theories of social exclusion and the project research findings, the paper argues that TAM is limited in the range of social conditions it anticipates and, thus, presumes a facility in formulating aspirations for use that people excluded from the use of ICTs cannot have. We argue that we need to consider engagement with technology rather than just adoption. We consider the implications of these findings for designing a revised basic ICT curriculum and describe the piloting of a new curriculum. We argue that, as ICTs in general—and Internet use in particular—are experienced technologies, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use need to be reformulated to recognize limitations on people’s ability to construct plans for future action since an actor’s world is disclosed through action not given in advance.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Ajzen, I. “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (50), March 1991, pp. 179–211.
Bourdieu, P. “The Forms of Capital” in S. Baron, J. Field, and T. Schuller (eds.), Social Capital: Critical Perspectives, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Bradbrook, G., and Fisher, J. “Digital Equality: Reviewing Digital Inclusion Activity and Mapping the Way Forwards,” Citizens Online, Swindon UK, March 2004 (available online at http://www.citizensonline.org.uk/site/media/documents/939_DigitalEqualityl.pdf)
Brown, S. A., and Venkatesh, V. “Model of Adoption of Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle,” MIS Quarterly (29:3), 2005, pp. 399–426.
Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J., and Piachaud, D. “Introduction” in J. Hills, J. Le Grand, and D. Piachuad (eds.), Understanding Social Exclusion, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. xiv.
Chatman, E. A. “The Impoverished Life-World of Outsiders,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science (47:3), 1996, pp. 193–206.
Ciborra, C. The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Cornford, T., and Klecun-Dabrowska, E. “Social Exclusion and Information Systems in Community Healthcare” in M. Korpela, R. Montealegre, and A. Poulymenakou (eds.), OrganizationalInformation Systems in the Context of Globalization, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, pp 291–306
Cushman, M. “St Martin’s Estate—An Area Profile” Penceil Papers 1, Penceil Project, London School of Economics, 2004.
Davis, F. D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), 1989, pp. 319–340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. “User Acceptance of Computer-Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical-Models,” Management Science (35:8), 1989, pp. 982–1003.
Devins, D., Darlow, A., and Smith, V. “Lifelong Learning and Digital Exclusion: Lessons from the Evaluation of an ICT Learning Center and an Emerging Research Agenda,” Regional Studies (36:8), 2002, pp. 941–945.
Digital Inclusion Panel. Enabling a Digitally United Kingdom: A Framework for Action, London: Cabinet Office, 2004.
Dutton, W. H., di Gennaro, C, and Hargrave, A. M. Oxford Internet Survey (2005 Report): The Internet in Britain, Oxford, UK: Oxford Internet Institute, 2005.
Dutton, W. H., and Shepherd, A. Trust in the Internet: The Social Dynamics of an Experience Technology, Oxford, UK: Oxford Internet Institute, 2003.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. W. “Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model,” MIS Quarterly (27:1), 2003, pp. 51–90.
Gefen, D., and Straub, D. W. “Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model,” MIS Quarterly (21:4), 1997, pp. 389–400.
Gefen, D., and Straub, D. W. “The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems (1:8), 2000, pp. 1–30.
Georgiou, G. General IT Literacy: A Research Report of a Survey of the British Population on Computer Usage, London: The British Computer Society, 2004.
Gordon, D., Adelman, L., Ashworth, K., Bradshaw, J., Levitas, R., Middleton, S., Pantazsis, C, Patsios, D., Payne, S., Townsend, P., and Williams, J. Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain, York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2000.
Haddon, L. “Social Exclusion and Information and Communication Technologies: Lessons from Studies of Single Parents and the Young Elderly,” New Media and Society (2:4), 2000, pp. 387–406.
Hall Aitken Associates. Community Access to Lifelong Learning Centers Evaluation: Interim Report on Survey Results, Hall Aitken Associates, London, 2004.
Hills, J., Le Grand, J., and Piachaud, D. Understanding Social Exclusion, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002
Howcroft, D., and Trauth, E. M. Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory and Application, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2005.
Hubregtse, S. “The Digital Divide Within the European Union,” New Library World (106:3/4), 2005, pp.164–172.
Introna, L. Management, Information and Power, Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan, 1997.
Korupp, S. E., and Szydlik, M. “Causes and Trends of the Digital Divide,” European Sociological Review (21:4), 2005, pp. 409–422.
Kvasny, L. “The Role of the Habitus in Shaping Discourses About the Digital Divide,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (10:2), 2005 (available online at http://jcmc.indiana. edu/voll0/issue2/kvasny.html).
Kvasny, L., and Keil, M. “The Challenges of Redressing the Digital Divide: A Tale of Two US Cities,” Information Systems Journal (16:1), 2006, pp. 23–53.
Lamb, R., and Kling, R. “Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly (27:2), 2003, pp. 197–235.
Liff, S., Steward, F., and Watts, P. “New Public Places for Internet Access: Networks for Practice-Based Learning and Social Inclusion” in S. Wolgar (ed.), Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 99–114.
Livingstone, S. “Media Literacy and the Challenge of New Information and Communication Technologies,” The Communication Review (7:1), 2004, pp. 3–14.
Lupton, R. Poverty Street: Causes and Consequences of Neighbourhood Decline, Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 2003.
Maguire, M., Macrae, S., and Milbourne, L. “Early Interventions: Preventing School Exclusions in the Primary Setting,” Westminster Journal of Studies in Education (26:2), 2003, pp. 43–62.
Milbourne, L. “Life at the Margin: Education of Young People, Social Policy and the Meanings of Social Exclusion,” International Journal of Inclusive Education (6:4), 2002, pp. 325–343.
Ngwenyama, O. K. “The Critical Social Theory Approach to Information Systems: Problems and Challenges” in H.-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, and R. Hirschheim (eds.), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1991, pp. 267–280.
Piachaud, D., and Sutherland, H. “Changing Poverty Post-1997,” CASE Oaper 63, Center for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, 2002.
Russell, N., and Stafford, N. “Trends in ICT Access and Use,” Research Report No. 358, Department for Education and Skills, London, 2002.
Selwyn, N. “Apart from Technology: Understanding People’s Non-Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life,” Technology in Society (25), 2003a, pp. 99–116.
Selwyn, N. “ICT for All? Access and Use of Public ICT Sites in the UK,” Information, Communication and Society (6:3), 2003b, pp. 350–375.
Selwyn, N. “At Home to Adult Learning,” E-learning Age, November 2004, pp. 20–21.
Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., and Furlong, J. “Whose Internet Is It Anyway? Exploring Adults’ (Non)Use of the Internet in Everyday Life,” European Journal of Communication (20:1), 2005, pp. 5–26.
Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., Furlong, J., and Madden, L. “Older Adults’ Use of Information and Communications Technology in Everyday Life,” Ageing and Society (23:5), 2003, pp. 561–582.
Silverstone, R., and Haddon, L. “The Role of Ac Services in Preventing Social Exclusion in the Emerging Information Society,” Working Paper 28, Graduate Research Center for Culture and Communication, University of Sussex, 1997 (available online at http://www.databank.it/ dbc/fair/download/fairform.asp?doc=wp_28.zip).
Silverstone, R., and Haddon, L. “New Dimension of Social Exclusion in a Telematic Society,” Working Paper 45, Graduate Research Center for Culture and Communication (CULCOM), University of Sussex, 1998 (available onine at http://www.databank.it/).
Simon, H. A. Models of Bounded Rationality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982.
Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,” Information Systems Research (6:2), 1995, pp. 144–176.
Veit-Wilson, J. Setting Adequacy Standards: How Governments Define Minimum Incomes, Bristol, UK: Polity Press, 1998.
Venkatesh, V., and Brown, S. A. “A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges,” MIS Quarterly (25:1), 2001, pp. 71–98.
Weick, K. E. “The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster,” Administrative Science Quarterly (38:4), 1993, pp. 628–652.
Woolgar, S. “Five Rules of Virtuality” in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society?, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1–22.
Wyatt, J., Allison, S., Donoghue, D., Horton, P., and Kearney, K. “Evaluation of CMF Funded UK Online Centers,” Hall Aitken Associates, London, 2003.
Wyatt, S., Thomas, G., and Terranova, T. “They Came, They Surfed, They Went Back to the Beach: Conceptualizing Use and Non-Use of the Internet,” in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society?, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 23–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cushman, M., Klecun, E. (2006). How (Can) Nonusers Engage with Technology: Bringing in the Digitally Excluded. In: Trauth, E.M., Howcroft, D., Butler, T., Fitzgerald, B., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Social Inclusion: Societal and Organizational Implications for Information Systems. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 208. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34588-4_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34588-4_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-34587-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-34588-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)