Abstract
There are many different ways in which Open Source ideas can be adopted by business, and influence the way in which companies do business. A number of different surveys have been conducted in different countries with the purpose of understanding the state of practice with respect to Open Source in companies. A number of different business models have been observed, ranging from the use of Open Source infrastructure products to basing a company’s entire business model on Open Source. In this paper we report on a study of the perceptions of Open Source and the uptake of open source products and development models in Swedish companies. We investigate this from the standpoint of stakeholders in those companies which have an expressed interest in Open Source, allowing a more in-depth analysis of the extent to which Open Source has influenced business thinking. From our analysis we find that uptake is much higher than reported in earlier studies, but is still concentrated in SMEs, consistent with the findings of previous studies. There is increased evidence of interest beyond the simple use of OS components at the (LAMP) infrastructure level. In particular, a significant proportion of the companies are in a symbiotic relationship with the OS community, supporting both through participation in existing projects and the release of new software under OS licences.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
5 References
P. J. Ågerfalk, A. Deverell, B. Fitzgerald, and L. Morgan. Assessing the Role of Open Source Software in the European Secondary Software Sector: A Voice from Industry, In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Open Source Systems (Scotto, M. and Succi, G. Eds.), p. 82–87, Genoa, Italy (2005).
G. Lawton. LAMP Lights Enterprise Development Efforts, IEEE Computer, September, p. 18–20 (2005).
ITEA. ITEA Report on Open Source Software, ITEA: Information Technology for European Advancement. ITEA Office Association, January 2004, www.itea-office.org (2004).
P. Gustafson and W. Koff. Open Source for Business. Computer Science Corporation, California, <www.csc.com/features/2004/uploads/LEF_OPENSOURCE.pdf>, September, (2004).
M. Schütz, N. Khan, and A. Chand. A Baseline Survey on Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) in the South Pacific: Knowledge, Awareness, and Usage, ICT Capacity Building at USP Project, The University of South Pacific, ISBN 982-01-0640-0 (2005).
e-Cology. Open Source Software — OSS — In Canada: A Collaborative Fact Finding Study, e-Cology Corporation, <www.e-cology.ca/canfloss/report/CANfloss_Report.pdf>, September (2003).
J. Giera. The Costs And Risks Of Open Source, April 12, Forrester Research Inc., Cambridge, US (2004).
U. Nikula, and S. Jantunen. Quantifying the Interest in Open Source Systems: Case South-East Finland. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Open Source Systems (Scotto, M. and Succi, G. Eds.), p. 192–95, Genoa, Italy (2005).
L. Dahlander and M. G. Magnusson. Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Research Policy, 34(4), 481–493 (2005).
S. Lussier. New Tricks: How Open Source Changed The Way My Team Works, IEEE Software, 21(1), 68–72 (2004).
FLOSS. FLOSS Final Report — Part 1: Free/Libre Open Source Software: Survey and Study, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands www.infonomics.nl/FLOSS/report (2002).
S. Krishnamurthy. Cave or Community? An Empirical Examination of 100 Mature Open Source Projects, First Monday, 7(6), www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_6/krishnamurthy/> (2002).
L. Zhao and S. Elbaum. Quality assurance under the open source development model. Journal of Systems and Software, 66(1), 65–75 (2003).
V. K. Gurbani, A. Garvert and J. D. Herbsleb. A Case Study of Open Source Tools and Practices in a Commercial Setting. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering, p. 24–29, ACM (2005).
C. Rossi and A. Bonaccorsi. Why profit-oriented companies enter the OS field? Intrinsic vs. extrinsic incentives, In Open Source Applications Spaces: Fifth Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering (5-WOOSE) May 17, ACM (2005).
J. West and S. O’Mahony. Contrasting Community Building in Sponsored and Community Founded Open Source Projects, In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’05)-Track 7, January 03–06, 2005, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, l0p (2005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lundell, B., Lings, B., Lindqvist, E. (2006). Perceptions and Uptake of Open Source in Swedish Organisations. In: Damiani, E., Fitzgerald, B., Scacchi, W., Scotto, M., Succi, G. (eds) Open Source Systems. OSS 2006. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 203. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34226-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34226-5_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-34225-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-34226-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)