Skip to main content

The Drosophila Protein Interaction Network May Be neither Power-Law nor Scale-Free

  • Chapter
Power Laws, Scale-Free Networks and Genome Biology

Part of the book series: Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit ((MBIU))

  • 949 Accesses

Abstract

Scale-free networks have become a topic of intense interest because of the potential to develop theories universally applicable to networks representing social interactions, internet connectivity, and biological processes. Scale-free topology is associated with power-law distributions of connectivity, in which most network components have only few connections while a very few components are extremely highly-connected. Here we investigate the power-law and scale-free properties of the network corresponding to protein-protein interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. We examine power-law behavior with a standard statistical technique designed to distinguish whether a power-law fit is adequate to describe the vertex degree distribution. We find that the degree distribution for the entire network, consisting of baits and preys, decays faster than power law. This fit may be confounded by artifacts of the screening procedure. The prey-only degree distribution is less likely to be confounded by the screening procedure, and is fit adequately by a power-law. When only the biologically relevant interactions are considered, however, the degree distribution again decays faster than power-law. Thus, power-law behavior may reflect interactions that are observed in vitro but not in vivo. We next describe an algorithm that may be able to extract the true distribution from the incomplete data. Finally, we investigate scale-free properties by characterizing organizational patterns over increasing spatial scales. We provide evidence for the existence of a length-scale that characterizes organization in the network. The existence of such a correlation length stands in contrast to scale-free networks, in which no length scale is special. These results suggest that the Drosophila protein interaction network may not be power-law and is not scale-free.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Giot L, Bader JS, Brouwer C et al. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 2003; 302:1727–1736.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2000; 403:623–627.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:4569–4574.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gavin AC, Bosche M, Krause R et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 2002; 415:141–147.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 2002; 415:180–183.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Robert F et al. Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 2002; 298:799–804.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of’ small-world’ networks. Nature 1998; 393:440–442.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barabasi AL, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999; 286:509–512.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. von Mering C et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 2002; 417:399–403.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Deane CM, Salwinski L, Xenarios I et al. Protein interactions: two methods for assessment of the reliability of high throughput observations. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002; 1:349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bader JS, Chaudhuri A, Rothberg JM et al. Gaining confidence in high-throughput protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol 2004; 22:00–00.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mossa S, Barthelemy M, Eugene Stanley H et al. Truncation of power law behavior in “scale-free” network models due to information filtering. Phys Rev Lett 2002; 88:138701.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg DS, Roth FP. Assessing experimentally derived interactions in a small world. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:4372–4376.

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA et al. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 2002; 297:1551–1555.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jin EM, Girvan M, Newman ME. Structure of growing social networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2001; 64:046132.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carlson JM, Doyle J. Complexity and robustness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99(Suppl 1):2538–2545.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Newman ME, Girvan M, Farmer JD. Optimal design, robustness, and risk aversion. Phys Rev Lett 2002; 89:028301.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Eurekah.com and Springer Science+Business Media

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bader, J.S. (2006). The Drosophila Protein Interaction Network May Be neither Power-Law nor Scale-Free. In: Power Laws, Scale-Free Networks and Genome Biology. Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33916-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics