Skip to main content

Dose Response: Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Approach

  • Chapter
Dose Finding in Drug Development

Part of the book series: Statistics for Biology and Health ((SBH))

Abstract

Almost all clinical trials include responses measured over time. It is valuable to understand how these responses arise as a function of treatment dose and time. It is particularly important in planning and interpreting Phase IIB (“dose response”) and Phase III (“confirmation of effectiveness”) trials. This chapter describes how the dose–response relationship can be understood in pharmacological terms. It reviews the basic principles of clinical pharmacology (pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and disease progress) and shows how they can be used to describe the time course of response both with and without drug.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J.J., Bolognese. J.A., and Felson, D.T. 2003. Comparison of rheumatoid arthritis clinical trial outcome measures: A simulation study. Arthritis and Rheumatism 48(11):3031–3038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, S.L., Boeckmann, A.J., and Sheiner, L.B. 1999. NONMEM Users Guides, NONMEM Project Group, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, N.G., Tan, K.K., Gilks, W.R., and Spiegelhalter, D.J. 1995. Estimation of population pharmacokinetics using the Gibbs sampler. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 23(4):407–435.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonate, P.L. 2000. Clinical trial simulation in drug development. Pharmaceutical Research 17(3):252–256.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chabaud, S., Girard, P., Nony, P., and Boissel, J.P. 2002. Clinical trial simulation using therapeutic effect modeling: Application to ivabradine efficacy in patients with angina pectoris. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 29(4):339–363.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, P.L.S., and Holford, N.H.G. 2001. Drug treatment effects on disease progression. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 41:625–659.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dayneka, N.L., Garg, V., and Jusko, W.J. 1993. Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 21(4):457–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duffull, S.B., Kirkpatrick, C.M.J., Green, B., and Holford, N.H.G. 2005. Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data using NONMEM and WinBugs. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 15(1):53–73.

    Article  PubMed  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration. 2003. Guidance for Industry Exposure-Response Relationships—Study Design, Data Analysis, and Regulatory Applications. Rockville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friberg, L.E., Brindley, C.J., Karlsson, M.O., and Devlin, A.J. 2000. Models of schedule dependent haematological toxicity of 2′-deoxy-2′-methylidenecytidine (DMDC). European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 56(8):567–574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Girard, P., Cucherat, M., and Guez, D. 2004. Clinical trial simulation in drug development. Therapie 59(3):287–295, 297–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomeni, R., Dangeli, C., and Bye, A. 2002. In silico prediction of optimal in vivo delivery properties using convolution-based model and clinical trial simulation. Pharmaceutical Research 19(1):99–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holford, N.H.G. 1986. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Understanding the dose-effect relationship. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 11: 483–504.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holford, N.H.G. 1991. “Physiological alternatives to the effect compartment model,” in Advanced Methods of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Systems Analysis (D’Argenio, D.Z., editor), New York: Plenum Press. pp. 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holford, N.H.G., Kimko, H.C., Monteleone, J.P., and Peck, C.C. 2000. Simulation of clinical trials. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 40:209–234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holford, N.H.G., and Ludden, T. 1994. “Time course of drug effect,” in Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology (Welling, P.G., and Balant, L.P., editors), Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holford, N.H.G., and Peace, K. 1994. The effect of tacrine and lecithin in Alzheimer’s disease. A population pharmacodynamic analysis of five clinical trials. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 47(1):17–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holford, N.H.G., and Peace, K.E. 1992a. Methodologic aspects of a population pharmacodynamic model for cognitive effects in Alzheimer patients treated with tacrine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89:11466– 11470.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holford, N.H.G., and Peace, K.E. 1992b. Results and validation of a population pharmacodynamic model for cognitive effects in Alzheimer patients treated with tacrine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89(23):11471–11475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holford, N.H.G., and Peck, C.C. 1992. “Population pharmacodynamics and drug development,” in The In Vivo Study of Drug Action (Boxtel, C.J., Holford, N.H.G., and Danhof, M., editors), New York: Elsevier Science. pp. 401–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holford, N.H.G., and Sheiner, L.B. 1981. Understanding the dose-effect relationship: Clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 6:429–453.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jumbe, N., Yao, B., Rovetti, R., Rossi, G., and Heatherington, A.C. 2002. Clinical trial simulation of a 200-microg fixed dose of darbepoetin alfa in chemotherapy-induced anemia. Oncology (Huntingt) 16(10 Suppl 11):37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimko, H.C., Reele, S.S., Holford, N.H., and Peck, C.C. 2000. Prediction of the outcome of a phase 3 clinical trial of an antischizophrenic agent (quetiapine fumarate) by simulation with a population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 68(5):568–577.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lesko, L.J., and Atkinson, A.J. 2001. Use of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in drug development and regulatory decision making: Criteria, validation, strategies. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 41:347–366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, P.A., Cook, J.A., Ewy, W.E., and Mandema, J.W. 2003. The use of clinical trial simulation to support dose selection: Application to development of a new treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. Pharmaceutical Research 20(11):1752–1759.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagashima, R., O’Reilly, R.A., and Levy, G. 1969. Kinetics of pharmacologic effects in man: The anticoagulant action of warfarin. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 10:22–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pillai, G., Gieschke, R., Goggin, T., Jacqmin, P., Schimmer, R.C., and Steimer, J.L. 2004. A semimechanistic and mechanistic population PK-PD model for biomarker response to ibandronate, a new bisphosphonate for the treatment of osteoporosis. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 58(6):618–631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segre, G. 1968. Kinetics of interaction between drugs and biological systems. Farmaco 23:907–918. Author: Please check the journal name for correctness.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner, L., and Steimer, J-L. 2000. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Drug Development. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 40:67–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner, L.B., Stanski, D.R., Vozeh, S., Miller, R.D., and Ham, J. 1979. Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: Application to D-tubocurarine. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 25(3):358–371.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stanski, D.R. 1992a. “Pharmacodynamic measurement and modelling of anesthetic depth,” in The In Vivo Measurement of Drug Action (Van Boxtel, C.J., Holford, N.H.G., and Danhof M., editors), New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanski, D.R. 1992b. Pharmacodynamic modeling of anesthetic EEG drug effects. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 32:423–447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The Parkinson Study Group. 2004. Levodopa and the Progression of Parkinson’s Disease. The New England Journal of Medicine 351(24):2498–2508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veyrat-Follet, C., Bruno, R., Olivares, R., Rhodes, G.R., and Chaikin, P. 2000. Clinical trial simulation of docetaxel in patients with cancer as a tool for dosage optimization. Clinical Pharmacology Therapeutics 68(6):677–687.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holford, N. (2006). Dose Response: Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Approach. In: Ting, N. (eds) Dose Finding in Drug Development. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33706-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics