Abstract
Almost all clinical trials include responses measured over time. It is valuable to understand how these responses arise as a function of treatment dose and time. It is particularly important in planning and interpreting Phase IIB (“dose response”) and Phase III (“confirmation of effectiveness”) trials. This chapter describes how the dose–response relationship can be understood in pharmacological terms. It reviews the basic principles of clinical pharmacology (pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and disease progress) and shows how they can be used to describe the time course of response both with and without drug.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J.J., Bolognese. J.A., and Felson, D.T. 2003. Comparison of rheumatoid arthritis clinical trial outcome measures: A simulation study. Arthritis and Rheumatism 48(11):3031–3038.
Beal, S.L., Boeckmann, A.J., and Sheiner, L.B. 1999. NONMEM Users Guides, NONMEM Project Group, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco.
Best, N.G., Tan, K.K., Gilks, W.R., and Spiegelhalter, D.J. 1995. Estimation of population pharmacokinetics using the Gibbs sampler. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 23(4):407–435.
Bonate, P.L. 2000. Clinical trial simulation in drug development. Pharmaceutical Research 17(3):252–256.
Chabaud, S., Girard, P., Nony, P., and Boissel, J.P. 2002. Clinical trial simulation using therapeutic effect modeling: Application to ivabradine efficacy in patients with angina pectoris. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 29(4):339–363.
Chan, P.L.S., and Holford, N.H.G. 2001. Drug treatment effects on disease progression. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 41:625–659.
Dayneka, N.L., Garg, V., and Jusko, W.J. 1993. Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 21(4):457–478.
Duffull, S.B., Kirkpatrick, C.M.J., Green, B., and Holford, N.H.G. 2005. Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data using NONMEM and WinBugs. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 15(1):53–73.
Food and Drug Administration. 2003. Guidance for Industry Exposure-Response Relationships—Study Design, Data Analysis, and Regulatory Applications. Rockville.
Friberg, L.E., Brindley, C.J., Karlsson, M.O., and Devlin, A.J. 2000. Models of schedule dependent haematological toxicity of 2′-deoxy-2′-methylidenecytidine (DMDC). European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 56(8):567–574.
Girard, P., Cucherat, M., and Guez, D. 2004. Clinical trial simulation in drug development. Therapie 59(3):287–295, 297–304.
Gomeni, R., Dangeli, C., and Bye, A. 2002. In silico prediction of optimal in vivo delivery properties using convolution-based model and clinical trial simulation. Pharmaceutical Research 19(1):99–103.
Holford, N.H.G. 1986. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Understanding the dose-effect relationship. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 11: 483–504.
Holford, N.H.G. 1991. “Physiological alternatives to the effect compartment model,” in Advanced Methods of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Systems Analysis (D’Argenio, D.Z., editor), New York: Plenum Press. pp. 55–68.
Holford, N.H.G., Kimko, H.C., Monteleone, J.P., and Peck, C.C. 2000. Simulation of clinical trials. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 40:209–234.
Holford, N.H.G., and Ludden, T. 1994. “Time course of drug effect,” in Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology (Welling, P.G., and Balant, L.P., editors), Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Holford, N.H.G., and Peace, K. 1994. The effect of tacrine and lecithin in Alzheimer’s disease. A population pharmacodynamic analysis of five clinical trials. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 47(1):17–23.
Holford, N.H.G., and Peace, K.E. 1992a. Methodologic aspects of a population pharmacodynamic model for cognitive effects in Alzheimer patients treated with tacrine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89:11466– 11470.
Holford, N.H.G., and Peace, K.E. 1992b. Results and validation of a population pharmacodynamic model for cognitive effects in Alzheimer patients treated with tacrine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89(23):11471–11475.
Holford, N.H.G., and Peck, C.C. 1992. “Population pharmacodynamics and drug development,” in The In Vivo Study of Drug Action (Boxtel, C.J., Holford, N.H.G., and Danhof, M., editors), New York: Elsevier Science. pp. 401–414.
Holford, N.H.G., and Sheiner, L.B. 1981. Understanding the dose-effect relationship: Clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 6:429–453.
Jumbe, N., Yao, B., Rovetti, R., Rossi, G., and Heatherington, A.C. 2002. Clinical trial simulation of a 200-microg fixed dose of darbepoetin alfa in chemotherapy-induced anemia. Oncology (Huntingt) 16(10 Suppl 11):37–44.
Kimko, H.C., Reele, S.S., Holford, N.H., and Peck, C.C. 2000. Prediction of the outcome of a phase 3 clinical trial of an antischizophrenic agent (quetiapine fumarate) by simulation with a population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 68(5):568–577.
Lesko, L.J., and Atkinson, A.J. 2001. Use of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in drug development and regulatory decision making: Criteria, validation, strategies. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 41:347–366.
Lockwood, P.A., Cook, J.A., Ewy, W.E., and Mandema, J.W. 2003. The use of clinical trial simulation to support dose selection: Application to development of a new treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. Pharmaceutical Research 20(11):1752–1759.
Nagashima, R., O’Reilly, R.A., and Levy, G. 1969. Kinetics of pharmacologic effects in man: The anticoagulant action of warfarin. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 10:22–35.
Pillai, G., Gieschke, R., Goggin, T., Jacqmin, P., Schimmer, R.C., and Steimer, J.L. 2004. A semimechanistic and mechanistic population PK-PD model for biomarker response to ibandronate, a new bisphosphonate for the treatment of osteoporosis. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 58(6):618–631.
Segre, G. 1968. Kinetics of interaction between drugs and biological systems. Farmaco 23:907–918. Author: Please check the journal name for correctness.
Sheiner, L., and Steimer, J-L. 2000. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Drug Development. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 40:67–95.
Sheiner, L.B., Stanski, D.R., Vozeh, S., Miller, R.D., and Ham, J. 1979. Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: Application to D-tubocurarine. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 25(3):358–371.
Stanski, D.R. 1992a. “Pharmacodynamic measurement and modelling of anesthetic depth,” in The In Vivo Measurement of Drug Action (Van Boxtel, C.J., Holford, N.H.G., and Danhof M., editors), New York: Elsevier Science.
Stanski, D.R. 1992b. Pharmacodynamic modeling of anesthetic EEG drug effects. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 32:423–447.
The Parkinson Study Group. 2004. Levodopa and the Progression of Parkinson’s Disease. The New England Journal of Medicine 351(24):2498–2508.
Veyrat-Follet, C., Bruno, R., Olivares, R., Rhodes, G.R., and Chaikin, P. 2000. Clinical trial simulation of docetaxel in patients with cancer as a tool for dosage optimization. Clinical Pharmacology Therapeutics 68(6):677–687.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holford, N. (2006). Dose Response: Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Approach. In: Ting, N. (eds) Dose Finding in Drug Development. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33706-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33706-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-29074-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-33706-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)