Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Aaron A. Hofmann
  • David F. Scott


Recent reports with up to 10-year clinical follow-up have demonstrated that cementless total knee arthroplasty can yield excellent results in young, active patients when sound implant design principles and surgical techniques are followed. Intimate apposition of the prosthesis to host bone is achieved with instrumentation that allows precise bone resection, and by the routine application of morselized autogenous bone chips to the cut surfaces. Revision of cementless total knee components without porous-coated pegs, keels, or stems has proven to be bone-sparing, which is an important consideration in the younger patient who may outlive their prosthesis. The authors believe that cementless fixation is a superior alternative to cemented fixation for primary total knee arthroplasty in younger patients with higher functional demands and good bone stock.


Total Knee Arthroplasty Femoral Component Total Knee Replacement Tibial Component Bone Ingrowth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hungerford DS, Krakow KA. Total joint arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop. 1985; 192:23–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moreland JR. Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988; 226:49–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ranawat CS, Johanson NA, Rimnac CM, Wright TM, Schwartz RE. Retreival analysis of porous-coated components for total knee arthroplasty. A report of two cases. Clin Orthop. 1986; 209:244–248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Insall JN, Hood RW, Flawn LB, Sullivan DJ. The total knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis. A five-to nine-year follow-up of the first one hundred consecutive replacements. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983; 65A:619–628.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson H, Carsten E, Frandsen P. Polyethylene failure of metal-backed patellar components. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991; 62:1–3.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baech J, Kofoed H. Failure of metal-backed patellar arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991; 62:166–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bayley JC, Scott R, Ewald F, Holmes G. Failure of the metal-backed patellar component after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1988; 70-A:668–673.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lombardi A, Engh G, Volz R, Albrigo J. Fracture/dissociation of the polyethylene in metal-backed patellar components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1988; 70-A:675–679.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosenberg A, Andriacci T, Barden R, Galante JO. Patellar component failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988; 236:106–114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stulberg D, Stulberg B, Hamati Y, Tsao A. Failure mechanisms of metal-backed patellar components. Clin Orthop. 1988; 236:88–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davies JP, Jasty M, O’Conner DO, Burke DW, Harrigan TP, Harris WH. The effect of centrifuging bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1989; 71B:39–42.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller J. Fixation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall J, ed. Surgery of the Knee. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1984:717–728.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whiteside LA. Cementless total knee replacement. Nineto eleven-year results and 10-year survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop. 1994; 309:185–192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laskin RS. Tricon-M uncemented total knee arthroplasty. A review of 96 cases followed for longer than two years. J Arthroplasty. 1988; 3:27–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosenberg AG, Barden RM, Galante JO. Cemented and ingrowth fixation of the Miller-Galante prosthesis. Clinical and roentgenographic comparison after three-to six-year follow-up studies. Clin Orthop. 1990;260:71–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mont MA, Mathur SK, Krakow KA, Loewy JW, Hungerford DS. Cementless total knee arthroplasty in obese patients. A comparison with a matched control group. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11:153–156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Whiteside LA. Fixation for primary total knee arthroplasty: cementless. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11:125–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jones LC, Hungerford DS. Cement disease. [Review]. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 1987; 225:192–206.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leland RH, Hofmann AA, Bachus KN, Bloebaum RD. Biocompatibility and bone response of human osteoarthritic cancellous bone to a titanium porous-coated cobalt chromium cylinder. Transactions of the Society for Biomaterials. 1991; 14:153 (abstract).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hofmann AA. Response of human cancellous bone to identically structured commercially pure titanium and cobalt chromium alloy porous coated cylinders. Clin Mater. 1993; 14:101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN, Mitchell W, Hoffman G, Hofmann AA. Analysis of the bone surface area in resected tibia. Implications in tibial component subsidence and fixation. Clin Orthop. 1994; 309:2–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN, Momberger NG, Hofmann AA. Mineral apposition rates of human cancellous bone at the interface of porous coated implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994; 28:537–544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bloebaum RD, Rhodes DM, Rubman MH, Hofmann AA. Bilateral tibial components of different cementless designs and materials: microradiographic, backscattered imaging, and histologic analysis. Clin Orthop. 1991; 268:179–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bloebaum RD, Rubman MH, Hofmann AA. Bone ingrowth into porous-coated tibial components implanted with autograft bone chips: analysis of ten consecutively retrieved implants. J Arthroplasty. 1992; 7:483–493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hofmann AA, Bloebaum RD, Rubman MH, Bachus KN, Plaster R. Microscopic analysis of autograft bone applied at the interface of porous-coated devices in human cancellous bone. Int Orthop. 1992; 16:349–358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Krug WH, Johnson JA, Souaid DJ, Miller JE, Ahmed AM. Anthropomorphic studies of the proximal tibia and their relationship to the design of knee implants. Trans Orthop Res Soc. 1983; 8:402 (abstract).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Branson PJ, Steege J, Wixson RL, Stulberg SD. Rigidity of initial fixation in noncemented total knee tibial components. Trans Orthop Res Soc. 1987; 12:293 (abstract).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dupont JA, Weinstein AM, Townsend PR. Tibial plateau coverage in total knee replacement. Tenth Annual Meeting Society for Biomaterials 1984; Washington, DC (abstract).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Westrich GH, Haas SB, Insall JN, Frachie A. Resection specimen analysis of proximal tibial anatomy based on 100 total knee arthroplasty specimens. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10:47–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee RW, Volz RG, Sheridan DC. The role of fixation and bone quality on the mechanical stability of tibial knee components. Clin Orthop. 1991; 273:177–183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Evanich CJ, Tkach TK, von Glinski S, Camargo MP, Hofmann AA. Six to ten year experience using countersunk metal-backed patellae. J Arthroplasty. 1996; In Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ. Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg. 1987; 69-A:745–749.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Krakow KA. The Technique of Total Knee Arthroplasty. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1990:118–137.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hofmann AA, Bachus KN, Wyatt RWB. Effect of the tibial cut on subsidence following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1991; 269:63–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bachus KN, Harman MK, Bloebaum RD. Stereoscopic analysis of trabecular bone orientation in proximal human tibias. Cells Mater. 1992; 2:13–20.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Rermier RW. The influence of total knee replacement design on walking and stair climbing. J Bone Joint Surg. 1982; 64-A:1328–1335.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ewald FC, Jacobs MA, Miegel RE. Kinematic total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1984; 66-A:1032–1040.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kelman GJ, Biden EN, Wyatt MP, Ritter MA, Colwell CW. Gait laboratory analysis of a posterior cruciate-sparing total knee arthroplasty in stair ascent and descent. Clin Orthop. 1989; 248:21–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ranawat CS, Hansraj KK. Effect of posterior cruciate sacrifice on durability of cement-bone interface. Orthop Clin N Amer. 1989; 20:63–69.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dorr LD, Ochsner JL, Gronley J. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retained versus cruciate-sacrificed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988; 236:36–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shoji H, Wolf A, Packard S, Yoshino S. Cruciate-retained and excised total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1994; 305:218–222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Insall JN, Lachiewcz PF, Burstein AH. The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. J Bone Joint Surg. 1982; 64-A:1317–1323.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Scott WN, Rubenstein M, Scuderi G. Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-sparing prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1988; 70-A:1163–1173.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Scuderi GR, Insall JN. The posterior stabilized knee prosthesis. Orthop Clin N Amer. 1989; 20:71.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hofmann AA, Tkach TK, Evanich CJ, Camargo MP. Posterior stabilization in total knee arthroplasty with use of an ultracongruent polyethylene insert. Orthopedic Transactions. 1996; (abstract).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cameron HU, Federhow DM. The patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1982; 165:196–199.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Clayton ML, Thirpathy R. Patellar complications after total condylar arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1982; 170:152–155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Brick GW, Scott RD. The patellofemoral component of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988; 231:163–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MR. The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop. 1993; 287:170–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Briard JL, Hungerford DS. Patellofemoral instability in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1989; S87–S97.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Grace JN, Rand JA. Patellar instability after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988; 237:184–189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Merkow RL, Soudry M, Insall JN. Patellar dislocation following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985; 67-A:1321–1327.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Nagamine R, Whiteside LA, White JE, McCarthy DS. Patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of tibial tray malrotation and articular surface configuration. Clin Orthop. 1994; 304:263–271.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Mahoney OM, Tullos HS. The effect of femoral component position on patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1990; 260:43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hofmann AA, Tkach TK, Evanich CJ, Camargo MP, Zhang Y. Patellar component medialization in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997; 12(5):155–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE. Subvastus (southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1991; 269:70–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Krause WL. Temperature elevations in orthopaedic cutting operations. J Biomech. 1982; 15:267–275.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Scott RD, Santore RF. Unicompartmental replacement for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 1981; 63A:536–544.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Collins DN, Heim SA, Nelson CL, Smith P. Porous-coated anatomic total knee arthroplasty. A prospective analysis comparing cemented and cementless fixation. Clin Orthop. 1991; 267:128–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings. Clin Orthop. 1990; 260:162–169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Beuchel FF. Cementless meniscal bearing knee arthroplasty: 7-to 12-year outcome analysis. Orthopedics. 1994; 17:833–836.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tkach TK, Evanich CJ, Hofmann AA, Camargo MP, Zhang Y. Six to ten year follow-up with cementless fixation. Orthopedic Transactions. 1996; (abstract).Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Magee FP, Weinstein AM. The effect of position on the detection of radiolucent lines beneath the tibial tray. Trans Orthop Res Soc. 1986; 11:357 (abstract).Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Mintz AD, Pilkington CA, Dip T, Howie DW. A comparison of plain and fluoroscopically guided radiographs in the assessment of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1989; 71A:1343–1347.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aaron A. Hofmann
    • 1
  • David F. Scott
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations