Skip to main content

Science to Practice in Intellectual Disability

The Role of Empirically Supported Treatments

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Issues on Clinical Child Psychology ((ICCP))

Abstract

Developmental disabilities, including mental retardation (or intellectual disability [ID]), are severe and chronic human conditions that are likely to continue indefinitely (P. L. 104-83, 1996). Although current definitions of mental retardation (American Psychiatric Association, 2000; American Association on Mental Retardation [AAMR], 2002; World Heath Organization, 1993) make no reference to the expected duration of the condition, it is generally accepted that mental retardation is lifelong and “essentially incurable” (Doll, 1941). For the most part, children diagnosed with ID develop into adults with ID. There are no credible reports of spontaneous remission of ID. Rather there is a legacy of failed attempts to raise the intelligence of affected individuals (for reviews, see Spitz, 1986, 1999). With the exception of people who function at the margin between mild mental retardation and borderline intelligence, improvements in intellectual functioning have typically been transient or due to interventions that inadvertently result in “teaching to the test” thereby increasing scores on intellectual assessments (Spitz, 1999, p. 285). Intelligence is a trait that remains remarkably stable over time, especially when scores fall below the average range (Sattler, 2001). This is not to say that cognitive and adaptive functioning cannot improve following interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Abbott, M., Walton, C., Tapia, Y., & Greenwood, C. R. (1999). Research to practice: A “blueprint” for closing the gap in local schools. Exceptional Children, 65, 339–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association on Mental Retardation. (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association on Mental Retardation Board of Directors. (2003). Resolution of the AAMR on evidence-based research and intellectual disability. Retrieved July 28, 2003, from http://www.aamr.org/Reading Room/pdf/resolution research.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, L. E., Aman, M. G., Martin, A., Collier-Crespin, A., Vitiello, B., Tierney, E., et al. (2000). Assessment in multisite randomized clinical trials of patients with autistic disorder: The Autism RUPP Network. Research Units on Pediatric Psychopharmacology. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(2), 99–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Begab, M. J. (1977). Barriers to the application of knowledge. In P. Mittler (Ed.), Research to practice in mental retardation (Vol. 1, pp. 1–30). Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beutler, L. E., Machado, P. P., & Neufeldt, S. S. (1994). Therapist variables. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavioral change (4th ed., pp. 229–269). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beutler, L. E., Moleiro, C., & Talebi, H. (2002). How practitioners can systematically use empirical evidence in treatment selection. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1199–1212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohart, A. C., O’Hara, M., & Leitner, L. M. (1998). Empirically violated treatments: Disenfranchisement of humanistic and other psychotherapies. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, C., Chambers, H., Goldstein, M., Harris, S., Leach, J., Campbell, S., et al. (1999). Evaluating research in developmental disabilities: A conceptual framework for reviewing treatment outcomes. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 41, 55–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685–716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668–1674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Didden, R., Duker, P. C., & Korzilius, H. (1997). Meta-analytic study on treatment effectiveness for problem behaviors with individuals who have mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 101, 387–399.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doll, E. A. (1941). The essentials of an inclusive concept of mental deficiency. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 46, 214–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drotar, D. (2002). Enhancing reviews of psychological treatments with pediatric populations: Thoughts on next steps. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27, 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dykens, E. M., & Hodapp, R. M. (1997). Treatment issues in genetic mental retardation syndromes. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, R. E. (1998). Editor’s introduction: A guide to the empirically supported treatments controversy. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, S. L. (1996). Some problems associated with “validated” forms of psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 218–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barlow, D. H., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1999). The scientist-practitioner: Research and accountability in the age of managed care. MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holburn, S., Jacobson, J. W., & Vietze, P. M. (2000). Quantifying the process and outcomes of person-centered planning. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105, 402–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, J. W., Mulick, J. A., & Foxx, R. M. (2005). Historical approaches to developmental disabilities. In J. W. Jacobson, J. A. Mulick, & R. M. Foxx (Eds.), Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities: Fad, fashion, and science in professional psychology (pp. 61–84). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, J. W., Mulick, J. A., & Schwartz, A. A. (1995). A history of facilitated communication: Science, pseudoscience, and antiscience. Working group on facilitated communication. American Psychologist, 50, 750–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahng, S., Iwata, B. A., & Lewin, A. B. (2002). Behavioral treatment of self-injury, 1964–2000. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107, 212–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E., & Bass, D. (1989). Power to detect differences between alternative treatments in comparative psychotherapy outcome research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Research, 57, 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, A. L. (1996, Winter). We have met the enemy and he is us! APP Advance, pp. 6, 19, 20, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J., & Bergin, A. E. (1994). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavioral change (4th ed., pp. 143–189). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal education and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundervold, D., & Bourland, G. (1988). Quantitative analysis of treatment of aggression, selfinjury, and property destruction. Behavior Modification, 12, 590–617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lutzker, J. R. (1993). Behavior analysis for developmental disabilities: The states of efficacy and comparative treatments. In T. R. Giles (Ed.), Handbook of effective psychotherapy (pp. 88–106). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, W. E., Jr. (2002). Challenges in translating research to practice for the field of mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 27, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1959). A comparison of clinicians with five statistical methods of identifying psychotic MMPI profiles. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, C. M. (1999). Empirically supported psychological treatments: A natural extension of the scientist-practitioner paradigm. Canadian Psychology, 40, 312–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostert, M. P. (2001). Facilitated communication since 1995: A review of published studies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 287–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norcross, J. C., & Newman, C. F. (1992). Psychotherapy integration: Setting the context. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 3–45). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odom, S. L., & Kaiser, A. P. (1997). Prevention and early intervention during early childhood: Theoretical and empirical bases for practice. In W. E. MacLean (Ed.), Ellis’ handbook of mental deficiency, psychological theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 137–172). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Special Education Programs. (OSEP). U.S. Department of Education. Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports-PBIS Mission. Retrieved July 28, 2003, from http://www.pbis.org/english/

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, C. (1996). NHS psychotherapy services in England, Rep. 96PP0043. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. L. 104–83. (1996). Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act Amendment of 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. D., & Fonagy, P. (1996). What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rounsaville, B. J., O’Malley, S., Foley, S., & Weissman, M. W. (1988). Role of manual-guided training in the conduct of efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 681–688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D. L., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. New York: Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran, J. D. (2001). When worlds collide: Psychoanalysis and the empirically supported treatment movement. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11, 659–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M. (2001). Assessment of children: Cognitive applications (4th ed.). San Diego, CA: Sattler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotti, J. R., Evans, I. M., Meyer, L. H., & Walker, P. (1991). A meta-analysis of intervention research with problem behavior: Treatment validity and standards of practice. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 233–256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shirk, S. (2004). Dissemination of youth ESTs: Ready for prime time? Clinical psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 308–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, W. H. (1996). Cookbooks, manuals, and paint-by-numbers: Psychotherapy in the 90’s. Psychotherapy, 33, 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sindelar, P. T., & Wilson, R. J. (1984). The potential effects of meta-analysis on special education practice. Journal of Special Education, 18, 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitz, H. H. (1986). The raising of intelligence: A selected history of attempts to raise retarded intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitz, H. H. (1999). Attempts to raise intelligence. In M. Anderson (Ed.), The development of intelligence (pp. 275–293). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, L., Taylor, R. L., & Babkie, A. (1994). Correlates of interventions with self-injurious behavior. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 38, 475–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, B. M., & Kaechele, H. (1998). The writing on the wall: Comments on the current discussion about empirically validated treatments in Germany. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 158–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strupp, H. H. (2001). Implications of the empirically supported treatment movement for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11, 605–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. W., Gallagher, E., & Steinmetz Breckenridge, J. (1987). Comparative effectiveness of psychotherapies for depressed elders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 385–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, H. R. (Ed.). (1981). The least restrictive alternative: Principles and practices. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. (1998, May). Guidance for industry: Providing clinical evidence of effectiveness for human drugs and biological products. Retrieved June 9, 2003, from http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/1397fnl.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (1996). Guide to clinical preventive services (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E., Mondin, G. W., Moody, M., Stich, F., Benson, K., Ahn, H., et al. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, “all must have prizes.” Psychological Bulletin, 122, 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, J. R., Chu, B. C., & Polo, A. J. (2004). Treatment dissemination and evidence-based practice: Strengthening intervention through clinician-researcher collaboration. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 300–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1993). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (10th ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hartley, S.L., Horrell, S.V., Maclean, W.E. (2007). Science to Practice in Intellectual Disability. In: Jacobson, J.W., Mulick, J.A., Rojahn, J. (eds) Handbook of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Issues on Clinical Child Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-32931-5_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics