Advertisement

A New Mixed-Model Assembly Line Planning Approach for an Efficient Variety Steering Integration

  • Stefan Bock
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 87)

Abstract

In order to deal with the extreme complexity occurring within mass customization production processes today, appropriate variety steering and formation concepts are mandatory. Those are responsible for a customer oriented variant definition which simultaneously reduces internal complexity. In order to achieve mass production at least costs, assembly lines are still attractive means. By avoiding transportation and storage as well as, in particular, by specifically training the employed workers, assembly lines yield substantial reductions of variable unit costs. However, by producing a mass customization variant program with billions of different constellations on the same line, an oscillating capacity use can be observed. Obviously, planning the structure of the used assembly lines and variety steering are strongly interdependent decision problems whose coping is decisive for efficient mass customization. Unfortunately, an integration of both decision levels currently fails because of lacking adequate approaches for mixed-model assembly line balancing. Since known concepts are still based on integral product architectures, they neither correspond to existing steering approaches nor do they cope with the extreme complexity of mass customization processes. Consequently, the present paper sketches a new balancing approach with a modular variant definition. In addition to this, the new model comprises a sophisticated personnel planning. In order to determine systematically appropriate line layouts, a randomized parallel Tabu Search algorithm is generated and analyzed. This approach was designed for the use in an ordinary LAN of personal computers which can be found in almost all companies today. In order to validate its utilizability in companywide networks, results measured for constellations with oscillating background loads are presented.

Key words

Variety Steering and Formation Mass Customization Mixed-model assembly line balancing Distributed algorithms 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amen, M. 2005. Cost-oriented assembly line balancing: Model formulations, solution difficulty, upper and lower bounds. European Journal of Operational Research, in press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, C., Scholl, A. 2005. A survey on problems and methods in generalized assembly line balancing. European Journal of Operational Research, in press.Google Scholar
  3. Blecker, T., Abdelkafi, N., Kaluza, B., Friedrich, G. 2003. Key Metrics System for Variety Steering in Mass Customization, in: Piller, F. T., Reichwald, R., Tseng, M. (eds.): Competitive Advantage Through Customer Interaction: Leading Mass Customization and Personalization from the Emerging State to a Mainstream Business Model. Proceedings of the 2nd Interdisciplinary World Congress on Mass Customization and Personalization-MCPC’03, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  4. Blecker, T., Abdelkafi, N., Kaluza, B., Kreutler, G. 2004. A Framework for Understanding the Interdependencies between Mass Customization and Complexity, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business Economics, Management and Marketing, Athens/Greece, 1–15.Google Scholar
  5. Blecker, T., Abdelkafi, N., Kaluza, B., Kreutler, G. 2004. Auction-based Variety Formation and Steering for Mass Customization. EM-Electronic Markets 14, 232–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bock, S. 2000. Modelle und verteilte Algorithmen zur Planung getakteter Fließlinien. DUV, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  7. Bock, S., Rosenberg, O. 2000. Dynamic Load Balancing Strategies for Planning Production Processes in heterogeneous Networks. Proceeding of the INFORMS Conference 2000 in Seoul, 951–955.Google Scholar
  8. Bock, S., Rosenberg, O., van Brackel, T. 2005. Controlling mixed-model assembly lines in real-time by using distributed systems. European Journal of Operational Research, in press.Google Scholar
  9. Bukchin, J. 1998. A comparative study of performance measures for throughput of mixed model assembly line balancing in JIT environment. International Journal of Production Research 36, 2669–2685.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bukchin, J., Dar-El, E.M., Rubinovitz, J. 2002. Mixed model assembly line design in a make-to-order environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering 41, 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bukchin, J., Masin, M. 2004. Multi-objective design of team oriented assembly systems. European Journal of Operational Research 156, 326–352.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duray, R., Ward, P.T., Milligan, G.W., Berry, W.L. 2000. Approaches to mass customization: configurations and empirical validation. Journal of Operations Management 18, 605–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fremery, F. 1991. Model-mix balancing: more flexibility to improve the general results. Production research: approaching the 21st century, Tailor & Francis, London, 314–321.Google Scholar
  14. Hansen, P.; Mladenović, N. 2001. Variable neighborhood search: Principles and applications. European Journal of Operational Research 130, 449–467.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Macaskill, J.L.C. 1972. Production-line balances for mixed-model lines. Management Science 19, 423–434.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Piller, F., Koch, M., Moeslein, K., Schubert, P. 2003. Managing high variety: How to overcome the Mass Confusion Phenomenon. Proceedings of the EURAM 2003 Conference, Milan.Google Scholar
  17. Pinnoi, A., Wilhelm, W.E. 1997. A family of hierarchical models for the design of deterministic assembly systems. International Journal of Production Research 35, 253–280.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pinto, P.A., Dannenbring, D.G., Khumawala, B.M. 1983. Assembly Line Balancing with Processing Alternatives: An application. Management Science 29, 817–830.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenberg, O. 1996. Variantenmanagement. In: Kern, W. et al. (Eds.). Handwörterbuch der Produktionswirtschaft, 2nd edition, Schäffer-Pöschel, Stuttgart, 2119–2129.Google Scholar
  20. Rosenberg, O., Ziegler, H. 1992. A comparison of Heuristic Algorithms for Cost-Oriented Assembly Line Balancing. Methods and Models of Operations Research 36, 477–495.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scholl, A. 1999. Balancing and Sequencing of Assembly Lines. 2nd edition, Physica, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  22. Scholl, A., Becker, C. 2005. State-of-the-art exact and heuristic solution procedures for simple assembly line balancing. European Journal of Operational Research, in press.Google Scholar
  23. Thomopoulos, N.T. 1970. Mixed model line balancing with smoothed station assignments. Management Science 16, 593–603.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Bock
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of PaderbornPaderbornGermany

Personalised recommendations