Advertisement

Platform Products Development and Supply Chain Configuration: An Integrated Perspective

  • Xin Yan Zhang
  • George Q. Huang
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 87)

Abstract

Platform Products Development (PPD) has been recognized as a formidable approach to effective Mass Customization (MC) for striking the balance between the necessary variety of end-products and the cost to meet the customer requirements in the highly competitive marketplace. Although it is generally acknowledged that it is more effective to consider PPD strategies and design decisions of the associated supply chain simultaneously, little attention and interests have been put on this problem. In this chapter, we conceptualize the problem of integrated configuration of platform products and supply chain and formulate it as a non-linear mathematical problem. Analysis of the model yields two properties, namely single sourcing and absolute replacement. These two properties form the basis of our solution procedure for the problem. The proposed model and solution procedure are applied to a simple numerical example and the computational results are presented and discussed.

Key words

platform product development supply chain configuration mass customization commonality modularity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, K. R., 1985, Safety stocks and commonality, Journal of Operations Management 6(1): 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benton, W. C., and Krajewski, L. J., 1990, Vendor performance and alternative manufacturing environments, Decision Sciences 21(2): 403–415.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, W. L., Tallon, W. J., and Boe, W. J., 1992, Product structure analysis for the master scheduling of assemble-to-order products, International Journal of Operations & Production Management 12(11): 24–41.Google Scholar
  4. Chakravarty, A. K., and Balakrishnan, N., 2001, Achieving product variety through optimal choice of module variations, IIE Transactions 33: 587–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collier, D. A., 1981, The measurement and operating benefits of component part commonality, Decision Sciences 12(1): 85–96.Google Scholar
  6. Collier, D. A., 1982, Aggregate safety stock levels and component part commonality, Management Science 28(11): 1296–1303.Google Scholar
  7. Dogramaci, A., 1979, Design of common components considering implications of inventory costs and forecasting, AIIE Transactions 11(2): 129–135.Google Scholar
  8. Gerchak, Y., and Henig, M., 1989, Component commonality in assemble-to-order systems: models and properties, Naval Research Logistics 36: 61–68.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerchak, Y., Magazine, M. J., and Gamble, A. B., 1988, Component commonality with service level requirements, Management Science 34(6): 753–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta, S., and Krishnan, V., 1999, Integrated component and supplier selection for a product family, Production and Operations Management 8(2): 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang, G. Q., Zhang, X. Y., and Liang, L., 2005a, Towards integrated optimal configuration of platform products, manufacturing processes, and supply chains, Journal of Operations Management 23: 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang, G. Q., Zhang, X. Y., and Lo, V. H. Y., 2005b, Integrated configuration of platform products and supply chains for mass customization: A game-theoretic approach, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  13. Meyer, M. H., 1997, Revitalize your product lines through continauous platform renewal, Research-Technology Management 40(2): 17–28.Google Scholar
  14. Meyer, M. H., and Lehnerd, A. P., 1997, The Power of Product Platforms: Building Values and Cost Leadership, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Park, B. J., 2001, A framework for integrating product platform development with global supply chain configuration, GIT PhD Dissertation, Georgia.Google Scholar
  16. Robertson, D., and Ulrich, K., 1998, Planning for Product Platforms, MIT Sloan Management Review 39(4): 19–31.Google Scholar
  17. Salvador, F., Forza, C., and Rungtusanatham, M., 2000, How to mass customize: Product architecture, sourcing configurations, Business Horizons 45(4): 62–69.Google Scholar
  18. Salvador, F., Forza, C., and Rungtusanatham, M., 2002, Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: theorizing beyond generic prescriptions, Journal of Operations Management, 20: 549–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ulrich, K. T., and Eppinger, S. D., 1995, Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Wheelwright, S. C., and Clark, K. B., 1992, Revolutionizing Product Development — Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xin Yan Zhang
    • 1
  • George Q. Huang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems EngineeringThe University of Hong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations