Abstract
This paper discusses the role of accountability in responsibility ascriptions regarding information and communication technology (ICT). It starts with a definition of responsibility as the social construct representing the ascription of an object to a subject. Recounting the traditional responsibility, the paper will point out the weaknesses of responsibility with regards to ICT. It will then propose an alternative way of dealing with responsibility under the heading of “reflective responsibility”. Accountability will be defined as the structures and institutions that establish a link between object and subject. As such it is a necessary condition of successful responsibility ascriptions. The paper will discuss the influence of ICT on the construction of accountability and consequently on responsibility. It will highlight the problem of pathological accountability where accountability becomes reified and solidified and in effect goes counter to the social aim of responsibility. The paper will conclude with a discussion of how problems and pathologies of accountability can be overcome in order for reflective responsibility to be able to fulfil its purpose.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barata, K. & Cain, P. (2001), Information, Not Technology, Is Essential to Accountability: Electronic Records and Public-Sector Financial Management, The Information Society 17, pp. 247–258
Bayertz, K. (1995), Eine kurze Geschichte der Herkunft der Verantwortung. In: Bayertz, K. (ed.) (1995), Verantwortung: Prinzip oder Problem? Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 3–71
Beu, D. & Buckley, M. R. (2001): The Hypothesized Relationship Between Accountability and Ethical Behavior, Journal of Business Ethics 34, pp. 57–73
Fauconnet, P. (1997), La responsabilité: étude de sociologie, In: Neuberg, Marc (ed.) (1997), La responsabilité — questions philosophiques, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 141–152
Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society — Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press
Goodpaster, K. E. & Matthews, J. B. Jr. (1982), Can a corporation have a moral conscience? Harvard Business Review (Jan–Feb 1982), pp. 132–141
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns — Band I+II. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag
Hart, H. L. A. (1948), The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1948: 171–194
Johnson, D. G. (2001), Computer Ethics, 3rd edition Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Johnson, D. G. & Mulvey, J. M. (1995), Accountability and Computer Decision Systems, Communications of the ACM (38:12), pp. 58–64
Laudon, K. C. & Laudon, J. P. (1999), Essentials of Management Information Systems. 4th edition London et al., Prentice Hall
Meijer, A. (2001), Electronic Records Management and Public Accountability: Beyond an Instrumental Approach, The Information Society 17, pp. 259–270
Nietzsche, F. (1987), Argumente gegen Vergeltung und Abschreckung, In: Hoerster, N. (ed.) (1987): Recht und Moral — Texte zur Rechtsphilosophie, Stuttgart, Philip Reclam jun., pp. 229–231
Nissenbaum, H. (1995), Computing and Accountability, in: Johnson, D. G. & Nissenbaum, H. (eds.) (1995), Computers, Ethics & Social Values. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, pp. 526–538
Skovira, R. J. (2003), The Social Contract Revised: Obligation and Responsibility in the Information Society. In: Azari, R. (ed.) Current Security Management & Ethical Issues of Information Technology. Hershey et al.: IRM Press, pp. 165–186
Spinello, R. (1997), Case studies in information and computer ethics, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
Stahl, B. C. (2004), Responsible Management of Information Systems, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey PA
Stahl, B. C. (2004b), Reflective Responsibility: Using IS to Ascribe Collective Responsibility,: Philosophy of Management (formerly Reason in Practice) (4:1), Special Issue on Organisation and Decision Processes, edited by Leonard Minkes and Tony Gear, pp. 13–24
Stahl, B. C. (2004), Information, Ethics, and Computers: The Problem of Autonomous Moral Agents,: Minds and Machines 14, Special Issue on the Philosophy of Information, edited by Luciano Floridi, pp. 67–83
Stahl, B. C.; Prior, M.; Wilford, S. & Collins, D. (2005), Electronic Monitoring in the Workplace: If People Don’t Care, then What is the Relevance? In: Weckert, J. (ed.), Electronic Monitoring in the Workplace: Controversies and Solutions. Idea-Group Publishing, Hershey PA, pp. 50–78
Wallace, R. J. (1996), Responsibility and the Moral Sentiment, Cambridge, Massachusetts / London, England, Harvard University Press
Weckert, J. & Adeney, D. (1997), Computer and Information Ethics, Westport, Connecticut / London: Greenwood Press
Yakel, E. (2001), The Social Construction of Accountability: Radiologists and Their Record-Keeping Practices, The Information Society 17, pp. 233–245
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stahl, B.C. (2006). Accountability and Reflective Responsibility in Information Systems. In: Zielinski, C., Duquenoy, P., Kimppa, K. (eds) The Information Society: Emerging Landscapes. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 195. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-31168-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-31168-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-30527-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-31168-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)